Ad Hawk's latest activity
-
Its hard to make any concrete assessments of what anyone on that defense last year is/was capable of when you pull back the curtain and... -
Define "finished product" OP. Playoff potential team...or SB contender?
-
Wait a bit. I suspect there may be some entertainment to be had.
-
Not one of you have the guts to put Knight on your lists a round or two later as the "experts" thought he would be there in the fifth or...
-
Ad Hawk replied to the thread Re-draft Seattle's draft.It seems that LB in the 4th makes great sense, filling a huge need. But if not Knight, then whom? I don't know college football well...
-
Ad Hawk replied to the thread Post UDFA's here.Well played, oly. Well played, indeed.
-
In my weekly call with JS, he let it slip the Hawks are reviewing the pensions of the scouts responsible for the egregious error of...
-
We have no idea if these players would have been available in the fifth or sixth. This is all a product of this ridiculous cottage...
-
Dope!
-
Well I guess that was my claim to fame-:). But I did finish the game!!
-
Just saw that Brendan is attending his best friend’s funeral today; he’s a pallbearer and is giving the eulogy. 😢
-
Ad Hawk reacted to Zybot's post in the thread 102? Cedric Gray? Jaden Hicks? Spencer Rattler? Anyone else? with
Like.
As a serviceable TE - depth piece I liked AJ Barner. I liked his release and his hands are fine. Good blocker. Maybe take him in the... -
And we just took the 4th.
-
They took him earlier than I thought, but seeing how the draft was going, he wouldn't have made it to 192, or 179 either. Glad they got...
-
I'm not sure, but I don't think they draft players to appease you and what you think they need. Again, I'm not sure though.
