Budda Baker

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,985
Reaction score
1,671
Location
Sammamish, WA
As a running back, he'd probably be very good. From what I've seen as a safety/defensive back....not very good. I don't know why he's not given a shot a RB? I think he's a liability at safety.
 

hawknation2014

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
0
hawkfan68":2q2kfwrp said:
As a running back, he'd probably be very good. From what I've seen as a safety/defensive back....not very good. I don't know why he's not given a shot a RB? I think he's a liability at safety.

Not a lot of good options at SS.
 

zifnab32

New member
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
hawkfan68":2hycqynh said:
As a running back, he'd probably be very good. From what I've seen as a safety/defensive back....not very good. I don't know why he's not given a shot a RB? I think he's a liability at safety.

He's like 175 pounds
 

JSeahawks

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
24,093
Reaction score
1
Location
Milwaukie, Oregon
I think offensively he'd play more of the slot receiver role. I know that where the ducks were recruiting him.
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
Baker looked great before today. UW's entire defense had issues anyway. The run defense at the first level was horrific, and the pass rush was a liability far too often.

It was a weird game. UW had some fantastic open field tackles at the second level, but really struggled to make tackles at the first level. I lost count of how many plays Colorado had that should have been 1 yard gains that turned into 6-10 yarders from poor LOS area tackling.
 
Top