After reading every entry about the draft

I have decided that it is way past the time where a player should be described as 'replacement for Golden Tate.' I think I've seen it used 4 or 5 times in the past couple weeks. Please, think of a different description from now on. Rant over. Sorry, I'm in a crappy mood.

cheese22":31zcq2yk said:

I have decided that it is way past the time where a player should be described as 'replacement for Golden Tate.' I think I've seen it used 4 or 5 times in the past couple weeks. Please, think of a different description from now on. Rant over. Sorry, I'm in a crappy mood.

Click to expand...

How about "gamer" or "hard nosed bastich" ?

Polished.

Haven't heard any potential draftees labeled "Donut stealer" yet so I'm not sure we've found the Tater's replacement.

Shane Ray's the drafts newest "Top Pot" so maybe he qualifies as a Tater replacement.

cheese22":28ycxion said:

I have decided that it is way past the time where a player should be described as 'replacement for Golden Tate.' I think I've seen it used 4 or 5 times in the past couple weeks. Please, think of a different description from now on. Rant over. Sorry, I'm in a crappy mood.

Click to expand...

So?

If he fits the void that Tate left then why is it a bad description. Should we call him "difference between winning and losing a super bowl player"???......

If you are discussing a OL then I would agree that it doesn't really fit.......

We miss Tate the PR more than anything. We miss Leon Washington the KR/PR as well. I'd rather replace Leon.

Tyler Lockette will sooth everyones hurt feelers over the loss of whatshisname.

Every team that Kansas State played knew he was "the guy" but couldn't
stop him anyway. He seemed to play his best against the best teams and
did it with a QB that didn't scare anybody.

Did I mention that he is a hell of a punt runner ?

Were drafting ty Montgomery. He already has the draft hat andis partying as we speak. :sarcasm_on:

But seriously