Not to beat a dead horse about Blount (the way Blount typically beats a dead horse by making multiple posts out of the same information), but he's doing a review of the Seahawks' last 5 draft picks with the best and worst picks from each draft.
For last year's spot, the worst pick (I think titled "poor") goes to Richardson. While his criticisms of Richardson are not necessarily unfair, the Seahawks drafted a guy who never even made it to camp because of a heart issue. How does that pick not rate as the worst? I mean, I'm not hating on the guy and I'm proud of the Seahawks for keeping him around to make sure he got some money and medical care, but if we're looking it objectively, that wasn't a good pick.
For last year's spot, the worst pick (I think titled "poor") goes to Richardson. While his criticisms of Richardson are not necessarily unfair, the Seahawks drafted a guy who never even made it to camp because of a heart issue. How does that pick not rate as the worst? I mean, I'm not hating on the guy and I'm proud of the Seahawks for keeping him around to make sure he got some money and medical care, but if we're looking it objectively, that wasn't a good pick.
