gowazzu02
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,911
- Reaction score
- 0
and given D's and F's by all the pundits. So when we all tune in today remember these guys spouting off on tv are all morons.
Just a reminder our 2012 draft was universally hated
- Thread starter gowazzu02
- Start date
OP
OP
gowazzu02
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,911
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foo ... raft-class
rw remembered.
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Follow
Russell Wilson
✔
@DangeRussWilson
The 2012 @seahawks draft class. They graded us as an F. Now we are World Champs! #GodisGood #GoHawks
3:46 PM - 5 Feb 2014
11,161 11,161 Retweets
13,137
rw remembered.
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Follow
Russell Wilson
✔
@DangeRussWilson
The 2012 @seahawks draft class. They graded us as an F. Now we are World Champs! #GodisGood #GoHawks
3:46 PM - 5 Feb 2014
11,161 11,161 Retweets
13,137
Trrrroy
New member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 3,304
- Reaction score
- 0
What's funny is after that draft turned out to be great it appears all the pundits are afraid to give the Hawks bad grades. If the Browns had the Seahawk's 2014 draft they would have been slammed, F's all around. But since it was the 'Hawks that did the picking it was all B's. And honestly, can't blame them. Schneider and Carroll have earned the benefit of the doubt.
OP
OP
gowazzu02
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,911
- Reaction score
- 0
Trrrroy":1vtu1qf6 said:
great point.
Can't wait to see kipers stupid face when JS baffles him again.
Grahamhawker
Well-known member
And Curry was Kiper's "Safest pick in the draft"...
Attyla the Hawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,559
- Reaction score
- 47
Yes. But then the 2013 and 2014 drafts were actually kind of bad.
I've said before this is kind of the rubber draft. I'm no longer at a point where I'm content with resting on the laurels of 2012 to rubber stamp future drafts as good.
Thus far, I'm not impressed. We should know by week 1 of the regular season if this draft shows promise. I kind of see this massive trade up as a trade up for Clark, not Lockett. Taking Clark necessitated this Lockett trade. So I guess I'm going to be judging this draft based on all the guys we could have taken with the picks we surrendered for Lockett.
Of course, we still have 5 more picks to go. So there is opportunity to knock this draft out of the park. But these moves have been necessary because of the value we placed on Clark. I hope he's good enough that when Avril's contract is up, he is a worthy successor.
I've said before this is kind of the rubber draft. I'm no longer at a point where I'm content with resting on the laurels of 2012 to rubber stamp future drafts as good.
Thus far, I'm not impressed. We should know by week 1 of the regular season if this draft shows promise. I kind of see this massive trade up as a trade up for Clark, not Lockett. Taking Clark necessitated this Lockett trade. So I guess I'm going to be judging this draft based on all the guys we could have taken with the picks we surrendered for Lockett.
Of course, we still have 5 more picks to go. So there is opportunity to knock this draft out of the park. But these moves have been necessary because of the value we placed on Clark. I hope he's good enough that when Avril's contract is up, he is a worthy successor.
Attyla the Hawk":33c43rgs said:
I agree.
What makes it more ridiculous is. Seattle could of traded down for Lockette from their 2nd round pick. Waited for Eli Harold to come off the board. Then traded back up 10-15 spots in the 3rd and secured Frank Clark, at a lower cost.
I am done playing the benefit of the doubt card, Seattle has been terrible in the draft since 2013.
