Attyla the Hawk wrote:Don't see it unless he's there at the end of the fourth (which we don't have anyway).
Seattle's very consistent with selecting excellent athletes in R1/R2. Walker's testing was awful (9th percentile of NFL edge players) pretty much precludes him from consideration.
It's not good when you don't test strong, or explosive, or fast, or agile. From a seahawk perspective, he's a day 3 kind of guy.
Attyla the Hawk wrote:Don't see it unless he's there at the end of the fourth (which we don't have anyway).
Seattle's very consistent with selecting excellent athletes in R1/R2. Walker's testing was awful (9th percentile of NFL edge players) pretty much precludes him from consideration.
It's not good when you don't test strong, or explosive, or fast, or agile. From a seahawk perspective, he's a day 3 kind of guy.
Attyla the Hawk wrote:Don't see it unless he's there at the end of the fourth (which we don't have anyway).
Seattle's very consistent with selecting excellent athletes in R1/R2. Walker's testing was awful (9th percentile of NFL edge players) pretty much precludes him from consideration.
It's not good when you don't test strong, or explosive, or fast, or agile. From a seahawk perspective, he's a day 3 kind of guy.
pcbball12 wrote:Attyla the Hawk wrote:Don't see it unless he's there at the end of the fourth (which we don't have anyway).
Seattle's very consistent with selecting excellent athletes in R1/R2. Walker's testing was awful (9th percentile of NFL edge players) pretty much precludes him from consideration.
It's not good when you don't test strong, or explosive, or fast, or agile. From a seahawk perspective, he's a day 3 kind of guy.
I definitely get this line of thinking, and it has been pretty consistent in the past with Seattle FO. But, the guy can flat out rush when inside. They have passed on guys due to the same reasons in the past and I think they somewhat regret it.
It is currently Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:01 pm
Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]