Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:11 pm
  • A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.
    When a person is dead, he doesn't know he's dead .. Same goes for being stupid.
    chet380
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 766
    Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:49 pm


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:13 pm
  • chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.
    User avatar
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5327
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:04 pm


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:39 pm
  • Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.



    There is though. Philly traded down at 32!

    We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!
    Now a guppy driver. Loving the Hawks with my bro Nanomoz for over 30 years
    User avatar
    rjdriver
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1832
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:11 am
    Location: Utah


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:51 pm
  • This was my “jump the shark” moment with Schneider and Carroll. I’ve been overwhelmingly positive with them, but they can hang their hat on one pick now...Wilson. The draft history of this team since 2013, including penny, is trash.
    User avatar
    endzorn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2612
    Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:14 pm


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:53 pm
  • Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.


    I used to agree with this, but I no longer trust our FO to make these decisions. They think they're smarter than everyone else who evaluates draft talent. Hasn't really worked out much lately.
    User avatar
    King Dog
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1579
    Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:13 pm
    Location: Phoenix, AZ


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:59 pm
  • rjdriver wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.



    There is though. Philly traded down at 32!

    We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!


    Because you were in the room when Baltimore called and the Hawks turned them down?
    User avatar
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5327
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:04 pm


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:00 pm
  • King Dog wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.


    I used to agree with this, but I no longer trust our FO to make these decisions. They think they're smarter than everyone else who evaluates draft talent. Hasn't really worked out much lately.

    Quite literally since 2013 they have done a terrible job of judging value.
    User avatar
    endzorn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2612
    Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:14 pm


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:50 pm
  • rjdriver wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.



    There is though. Philly traded down at 32!

    We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!


    This is WRONG! Baltimore would have had to pay MORE for #27, and the 5 year payroll for #32 is much cheaper than#27!

    You cannot make these statements!
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy

    http://ivotuk.com/
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 17192
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:00 pm
  • There was calls and they turned them down, Pete wanted Penny. I thought it a reach but the more we know the shorter that reach becomes to more of the right place.

    Sony picked at 32 also, Belechik hates fumbles, I wonder if they were the callers that wanted to trade right away after our pick which we turned down.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 24235
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:08 pm
  • I don't understand the Michel pick. I like him, but I think he's not quite NFL ready. I think Chubb would have been better.

    I think Chubb, much like Todd Gurley, was well on his way back from his knee injury, and will be a better RB.
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy

    http://ivotuk.com/
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 17192
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:14 am
  • I knew it would be here. But I still have to post. I HATE THIS TAKE.

    "Some no talent blogger who lives in his moms basement" Or "some talking head who went 1-9 in their top 10 mock" Said Penny would be a 2nd or 3rd rd pick. So the coach and GM who brought a superbowl to Seattle are wrong.

    Just a DUMB DUMB take.

    I get not liking taking a RB. But saying the 2nd best RB in the draft per PC/JS is a reach at 27 cause some idiot who throws darts at a board thinks they could get him later is just silly.
    User avatar
    gowazzu02
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1645
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:32 am


Re: I Guess There Wasn't A Trade Partner
Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:56 pm
  • rjdriver wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    chet380 wrote:A #2 and ... for #27 -- no takers?

    We could have Penny much later.


    People say this, but there's really no way of knowing.



    There is though. Philly traded down at 32!

    We could have given Baltimore 27 for whatever they gave Philiy and still got Penny!

    Care to explain the logic here?
    purpleneer
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 299
    Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:19 pm
    Location: The Green Lantern (almost)




It is currently Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:34 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests