davidonmi
New member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 2,507
- Reaction score
- 0
Am I crazy in thinkig this, pair him with Okung, a lot of analysts absolutely eat him up.
chris98251":2p67axp5 said:Trade up for a guy when we have huge other needs, not my idea of using your resources very well. Carpenter, Moffit, a FA, Sweezy. We have players, most are coming back from injuries and probably will contribute much better this next year as a more cohesive unit with a year of working together under their belt.
chris98251":3w3hbdf2 said:Trade up for a guy when we have huge other needs, not my idea of using your resources very well. Carpenter, Moffit, a FA, Sweezy. We have players, most are coming back from injuries and probably will contribute much better this next year as a more cohesive unit with a year of working together under their belt.
jlwaters1":yrw58q4k said:Remember Last year DeCastro- Guard from Stanford, was suppose to be the best prospect since Hutch. He got drafted by the Steelers. The only problem is he had very little impact this year due to injury.
So to me it's not worth it trading up big to get one player. Say that player get's injured now you have no impact with that player in the current year, + you have less rookies to groom.
Everyone was praising the Redskins trade to get RG3, but now they are out their next 2- 1st round picks and now he's on the shelf 6 or more months. Taking his injury into account it's looking alot more favorable to the Rams. I'd rather stay @ 25 and get real value for the pick.
Throwdown":3hzf8uki said:considering Carpenters our LG, I'm not moving up for a RG, you crazy?
hawksfan515":119oysx6 said:Throwdown":119oysx6 said:considering Carpenters our LG, I'm not moving up for a RG, you crazy?
The Sweez is our RG of the future anyways.
:13:hawksfan515":27wvjdzi said:Throwdown":27wvjdzi said:considering Carpenters our LG, I'm not moving up for a RG, you crazy?
The Sweez is our RG of the future anyways.
Seanhawk":10wejlyb said:jlwaters1":10wejlyb said:Remember Last year DeCastro- Guard from Stanford, was suppose to be the best prospect since Hutch. He got drafted by the Steelers. The only problem is he had very little impact this year due to injury.
So to me it's not worth it trading up big to get one player. Say that player get's injured now you have no impact with that player in the current year, + you have less rookies to groom.
Everyone was praising the Redskins trade to get RG3, but now they are out their next 2- 1st round picks and now he's on the shelf 6 or more months. Taking his injury into account it's looking alot more favorable to the Rams. I'd rather stay @ 25 and get real value for the pick.
Not very sound logic here. I'm not saying that trading up for Warmack is the best idea, but not drafting the top prospect at a position because last year's top prospect at the same position had injury issues in his rookie season is absolutely ridiculous.
HawksSoc":2r22pge6 said:Seanhawk":2r22pge6 said:jlwaters1":2r22pge6 said:Remember Last year DeCastro- Guard from Stanford, was suppose to be the best prospect since Hutch. He got drafted by the Steelers. The only problem is he had very little impact this year due to injury.
So to me it's not worth it trading up big to get one player. Say that player get's injured now you have no impact with that player in the current year, + you have less rookies to groom.
Everyone was praising the Redskins trade to get RG3, but now they are out their next 2- 1st round picks and now he's on the shelf 6 or more months. Taking his injury into account it's looking alot more favorable to the Rams. I'd rather stay @ 25 and get real value for the pick.
Not very sound logic here. I'm not saying that trading up for Warmack is the best idea, but not drafting the top prospect at a position because last year's top prospect at the same position had injury issues in his rookie season is absolutely ridiculous.
Um I think his point was not to trade up lots, thereby putting all your eggs in one basket to get one guy, rather then drafting the best prospect available. The two examples he gives are the two biggest trades from last year's draft and he mentions specifically 'So to me its not worth it trading up big to get on player'.
pehawk":29ils9u7 said:No way. Rang hinted last year the Hawks wont be investing high picks in the OL again, because they believe Cable can turn ANYONE into a legit starter.
theENGLISHseahawk":3fkv53ar said:pehawk":3fkv53ar said:No way. Rang hinted last year the Hawks wont be investing high picks in the OL again, because they believe Cable can turn ANYONE into a legit starter.
He also said we'd be surprised by how close the Notre Dame-Alabama game would be because ND's offensive and defensive lines were both SEC quality.
And he said Jimmy Clausen to Seattle with the #6 pick in his final 2010 mock draft.
And he said Cam Newton wasn't a first round pick.
I shall stop now.