Should EJ Manuel be rated higer?

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
Re: Should EJ Manuel be rated higer?
Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:36 pm
  • I don't see him as a viable option for Seattle, even if he lasted til say the 4th round. Too similar to Josh Portis IMO.
    In the high rounds (1-4) I'd prefer Matt Scott. In the low rounds(5-UDFA), I'd still prefer BJ Daniels.
    User avatar
    kigenzun
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 392
    Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:37 pm


Re: Should EJ Manuel be rated higer?
Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:05 pm
  • Buffalo Bills say yes.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18708
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Should EJ Manuel be rated higer?
Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:36 pm
  • IMO, Buffalo picked wrong. There's a reason some teams continue to pick in the top 10, year after year.
    I am Godzilla, you are Japan!
    User avatar
    Recon_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2181
    Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:01 pm
    Location: Vancouver, Wa


Re: Should EJ Manuel be rated higer?
Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:09 pm
  • I don't know if the Bills picked right or not, but in a league obsessed with the next Russell Wilson, Manuel's the choice. His intangibles are way high, that's why he went higher, IMO.

    But...

    I think he's 1A to Geno, personally.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11484
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm




It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 7:35 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: CPHawk and 9 guests