RG3 type deal to trade up to #1

tifferradish

New member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... rall-pick/

Who here would take that deal to move up and get Clowney? Part of me says I'd do it, because of how rare of a talent he is. Our front office has shown time and time again, that it knows how to draft well in the later rounds. I think I would be happy if it happened, but I seriously doubt it will.
 

hawknation2014

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
0
Our first round picks will be worth a hell of a lot less than Washington's. Washington only moved up four spots. How much would you have to give Houston to get them to move back 31 spots?

Maybe throw in one of our marquee players in addition to future first round picks? It wouldn't be worthwhile for either team.
 

SNDavidson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
2,696
Reaction score
615
IMO this would be completely contradictory to everything that JS is as a GM, we build the roster through the draft. I don't believe he will ever mortgage an entire draft+ for one player, ever.
 

Scottemojo

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1
All our picks added together dont add up to enough to move up to number one on a single trade value chart. We would probably have to throw in all of next year's non compensatory picks as well. Seriously.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
Scottemojo":1meolqjk said:
All our picks added together dont add up to enough to move up to number one on a single trade value chart. We would probably have to throw in all of next year's non compensatory picks as well. Seriously.


Without looking at the chart, not only are you right, but we'd probably also have to throw in next year's 1 to go with those compensatory picks. As attractive as they should be.

Too many questions surrounding Clowney for my liking. The only sure-fire pick in this draft (IMO) that would warrant a mega deal, would be Greg Robinson. I would bet the farm he sees more pro bowls than any other player selected.
 

two dog

New member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
0
Location
Doin' time in Yakima
Never, nohow, no way. JS regards draft picks like gold and has said so. Unless the deal
is too good to turn down, eg. getting an athlete like Terrell Pryor for a seventh round
draft pick.

Schneider will make every effort to increase our number of draft picks, not lessen them.
 

jhern87

New member
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
At this point we need a steady rotation of young guys coming to the team.. Personally I'd rather keep our picks and possibly get a guy like Dee Ford where we're at. I think he would be a beast coming off of the edge.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,252
Reaction score
5,261
Location
Kent, WA
We're already "at the top." We don't need that one player to put us over. Silly idea IMHO, and not even worth speculating about.

:229031_shrug:
 

jblaze

New member
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
0
No way in hell. Not the PC/JS way nor is it feasible given how much we'd have to give up to get to #1.

We're trying to trade back to get more picks, not less. We need cheap talent to mitigate some of the losses we've had and will have in the future. Given how the new CBA contracts are, you've got team control for 5 years from the draft and that's invaluable to a team. Not to mention, we have some holes to fill. Not so much this year for starters per se, but we need some hedging of our bets to make sure we're covered for CB's, LB's, DE's and DT's in the next couple of years as cap casualties happen or guys move on.

Given the track record of PC/JS, I think they trade back a couple of times in this draft starting with #32. We'll pick up a third from that and maybe a 4th rounder to pick up a late 5th or early 6th.
 

Hawkfan77

Active member
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
0
HawkWow":3hgzh26v said:
Scottemojo":3hgzh26v said:
All our picks added together dont add up to enough to move up to number one on a single trade value chart. We would probably have to throw in all of next year's non compensatory picks as well. Seriously.


Without looking at the chart, not only are you right, but we'd probably also have to throw in next year's 1 to go with those compensatory picks. As attractive as they should be.

Too many questions surrounding Clowney for my liking. The only sure-fire pick in this draft (IMO) that would warrant a mega deal, would be Greg Robinson. I would bet the farm he sees more pro bowls than any other player selected.
Cant trade compensatory picks
 

Lords of Scythia

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
168
hawknation2014":35979j71 said:
Our first round picks will be worth a hell of a lot less than Washington's. Washington only moved up four spots. How much would you have to give Houston to get them to move back 31 spots?

Maybe throw in one of our marquee players in addition to future first round picks? It wouldn't be worthwhile for either team.
Yeah, even if we traded them the next five first-round picks, they'd all be at #32.
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
I love Clowney but no.. not worth it. We need these picks to replace the talent that will eventually depart via FA
 

Latest posts

Top