toffee
Well-known member
https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/footb ... ashington/
He did have hands issue, dropped lots of balls?
He did have hands issue, dropped lots of balls?
Wilson recruiting WR Terrelle Pryor? Update: Signed w/Jets
- Thread starter Jville
- Start date
vin.couve12
New member
Yeah, but Jimmy and PRich had dropped more balls than any receivers the Hawks have had in the last 15 years. You also see that you can put a pretty good 6'0 athletic corner on Pryor and he just dominates them physically. Not just in a Jimmy Graham way (size) or a PRich way (speed), but he does both regularly. He'll outrun, slow down, high point, push off, etc. Even when he's jogging or varying speed for an underthrown ball CBs have a real tough time with him.toffee":2ncxaf21 said:
Or at least they did two years ago. Dude is a pretty special athlete. I'm just not sure how much this is worth and it's still a gamble.
Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
vin.couve12":2y7vjv2j said:
The Redskins paid him $6M not $3M. $3M salary + $3M bonus = $6M for 2017.
vin.couve12
New member
OK, so do we pay that much? Someone will.Seymour":v9n2s9z0 said:
Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
vin.couve12":wsh0y2qt said:
No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.
vin.couve12
New member
Same ish. We're lacking conviction in that already just like the last two years. It's like when a dude wants to get married to a good woman so they might have a chance at happiness in the long term and then some smoking hot sloot walks by.....Seymour":367ny0oe said:
King Dog
Well-known member
What a mismatch he would be. I hope they make this happen. Baldwin, Lockett, Pryor and Brown doesn't sound half bad.
Get a bad arse Guard and RB in the draft and we would be looking pretty good on offense.
Get a bad arse Guard and RB in the draft and we would be looking pretty good on offense.
IndyHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 8,004
- Reaction score
- 1,640
The Thomas trade will cover the RB spot and OL with the draft picks we will get.Seymour":xblswq2l said:
Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
IndyHawk":3uwquaja said:
Provided we seek a lobotomy in the OL / RB draft room, I agree. Not saying we don't try, just saying...odds are not in our favor. I'd rather draft the areas we are better at, and sign proven talent were we aren't. Oline and RB we suck at drafting. Cable gone will help, just how much we may be forced to observe until Pete is gone.
adeltaY
New member
Wilson has a fantastic deep ball so this could work really well. I'm with vin, I'd say 3M max though given he got 6M last year.
brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
We only had three routes in our tree last few seasons so it wouldn’t have been difficult for him to learn. Who knows what our offense looks like now though?
toffee
Well-known member
Come to think of it, if we could sign Pryor for 30%-40% of what we paid Jimmy Graham, we are coming out ahead. Pryor creates mismatch due to his size and speed, same as Graham. Pryor dropped some balls, hey not like Graham didn't. Pryor probably couldn't block, guess what? So couldn't/wouldn't Graham.
Pryor, Decker, Cody Latimer, Brice Butler or Mike Wallace seem like the best free agent fits remaining if they can be had for cheap and if they can't trade for Martavis Bryant.
Current depth:
Baldwin
Lockett
Brown
Darboh
Moore
Marcus Johnson
McEvoy
Grayson
Dickson
Vannett
Swoopes
Current depth:
Baldwin
Lockett
Brown
Darboh
Moore
Marcus Johnson
McEvoy
Grayson
Dickson
Vannett
Swoopes
[tweet]https://twitter.com/GregBishopSI/status/975436125207633920[/tweet][tweet]https://twitter.com/bcondotta/status/975450893435850752[/tweet]
I'm a little uneasy about the make up and fit of Terrelle Pryor. But, if they feel compelled to take a shot at a possible receiving star, wide receiver is certainly the appropriate position group.
For Terrelle Pryor, health will be a key ingredient to a potential 2018 rebound >>> [urltargetblank]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/03/18/for-terrelle-pryor-health-will-be-a-key-ingredient-to-a-potential-2018-rebound/[/urltargetblank]
I'm a little uneasy about the make up and fit of Terrelle Pryor. But, if they feel compelled to take a shot at a possible receiving star, wide receiver is certainly the appropriate position group.
For Terrelle Pryor, health will be a key ingredient to a potential 2018 rebound >>> [urltargetblank]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/03/18/for-terrelle-pryor-health-will-be-a-key-ingredient-to-a-potential-2018-rebound/[/urltargetblank]
hawkfan68
Well-known member
Please no...just say no to Pryor. Dude is a complete waste of money.
toffee
Well-known member
Darboh and Vannett probably hasn’t work out the way Pete likes if the Hawks are signing TE and WRs.massari":nkohukdt said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Darboh was a rookie WR that actually started seeing a number of snaps last year. He probably played and was active more than Golden Tate was his rookie year with us. I would say that bodes well for his future. WR is a tough position to play early on in a career. I think they are just trying to get really competitive with the 4-6 receivers. And Vannett I believe is exactly what they thought he was. A solid number 2 TE that can start in a pinch. And with a team that is most likely going to run a ton of 2 TE sets under Shotty, that is a valuable piece. Signing Dickson doesn’t mean much as far as Vannett goes in my opinion. Under Shotty, they will need 2 good TE’s.toffee":2pg7zc5l said:
purpleneer
New member
Stubbornly thinking big play on most of the playaction looks was part of the problem. I'd like to see reliability of the offense improve and that comes from moving the chains, giving the O a chance to build rhythm, and getting more total plays so you can pick your spots to go deep. As much as taking most of a game to get more than a couple FGs on the board was a big problem, so was the propensity to put the D back out quickly and with at least the feeling of a small margin for error.pcbball12":30ov6hb9 said:
That said, improving the ability to go downfield with speed and size helps open up everything else and makes opponents feel better about "just" giving up some first downs.
Similar threads
