Skip and Shannon

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
Honestly though,

wouldn't the team be basically in the same position even if they had won that game?

I mean how much of the team's current predicaments are based on whether or not Lynch scores or Wilson completes the pass?

It sucked for fans and the players. But I struggle to see the direct connection between that play and now. Bennett, Sherman, Graham, Lynch, the Richardson's, Avril, Kam would still not be on this team regardless.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
Uncle Si":3fs9wic7 said:
Honestly though,

wouldn't the team be basically in the same position even if they had won that game?

I mean how much of the team's current predicaments are based on whether or not Lynch scores or Wilson completes the pass?

It sucked for fans and the players. But I struggle to see the direct connection between that play and now. Bennett, Sherman, Graham, Lynch, the Richardson's, Avril, Kam would still not be on this team regardless.

Depends on how much you think morale factors in to output. I tend to undervalue morale which i'll totally cop to, and I'd agree that maybe it doesn't make a difference long term in who is here and who isn't. But maybe a bit more solid morale is worth 1 or 2 wins per season for the team which seems small but could have a ton of unknown knock on effects.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,342
Reaction score
1,863
Uncle Si":1fnz6uuu said:
Honestly though,

wouldn't the team be basically in the same position even if they had won that game?

I mean how much of the team's current predicaments are based on whether or not Lynch scores or Wilson completes the pass?

It sucked for fans and the players. But I struggle to see the direct connection between that play and now. Bennett, Sherman, Graham, Lynch, the Richardson's, Avril, Kam would still not be on this team regardless.

I dont believe so. I dont think Pete would have lost the locker room or the drama would have happened. I think a lot of the current teams issues are attributed to that play. So do a lot of other people apparently.
 
OP
OP
hawksincebirth

hawksincebirth

Active member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
776
Reaction score
92
Location
Marysville
Uncle Si":11swp9gi said:
Honestly though,

wouldn't the team be basically in the same position even if they had won that game?

I mean how much of the team's current predicaments are based on whether or not Lynch scores or Wilson completes the pass?

It sucked for fans and the players. But I struggle to see the direct connection between that play and now. Bennett, Sherman, Graham, Lynch, the Richardson's, Avril, Kam would still not be on this team regardless.
So chance at 3 peat doesn’t change anything? Sherman still here ? Maybe Bennett ? You see no ripple effects what so ever ?
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
All those players were here the year after the loss and got hammered by the Panthers in the playoffs.

Were they so dumbstruck by that loss that they pulled it together for a season only to REALLY let it bother them in the playoffs?

Come on.. people are stronger than that. They snuck into that Super Bowl to begin with. they had a great run to end the regular season with historic QB play the year after and got bullied by a better Panthers team. That's where it started to unravel. A lot of people think that way, too.

And let's say they 3-peat. Where are those players today, which is what i was asking? they're still hurt, old, gone. Why would an aging, injured Sherman with a bad wheel and 11 million be any more tantalizing to the team with a Super Bowl win then without it? Bennett the same. You think winning was going to suddenly resolve their attitudes?

The Play tarnished a legacy. It's impact on the team now is probably a bit more complicated then "its the reason we suck"

I can buy the morale thing, but still... none to a couple of the aforementioned players would be here for a variety (money, injury, age) reasons.

The Play is just an easy, lazy target for a far more complicated cycle of events (overpaying vets, bad trades, bad drafts, poor coaching, defense heavy contracts, poor teammates). hell, if anything, its just part of a much larger cycle, rather than being THE issue.

It's reductive (and honestly narrow minded) to find blame in one side of any of this. But it's not one play, regardless of that play's significance. This was always a teeter-totter over a cache of dynamite. When perfectly balanced it was a great thing. But it was always delicate... and fleeting.
 

adeltaY

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR
If we got the three peat nothing would matter. We would be legends. Instead we are what we are.
 

DJ_CJ

Active member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
660
Reaction score
148
Location
Cedar Rapids, IA
Uncle Si":1v8k1beu said:
All those players were here the year after the loss and got hammered by the Panthers in the playoffs.

Were they so dumbstruck by that loss that they pulled it together for a season only to REALLY let it bother them in the playoffs?

Come on.. people are stronger than that. They snuck into that Super Bowl to begin with. they had a great run to end the regular season with historic QB play the year after and got bullied by a better Panthers team. That's where it started to unravel. A lot of people think that way, too.

And let's say they 3-peat. Where are those players today, which is what i was asking? they're still hurt, old, gone. Why would an aging, injured Sherman with a bad wheel and 11 million be any more tantalizing to the team with a Super Bowl win then without it? Bennett the same. You think winning was going to suddenly resolve their attitudes?

The Play tarnished a legacy. It's impact on the team now is probably a bit more complicated then "its the reason we suck"

I can buy the morale thing, but still... none to a couple of the aforementioned players would be here for a variety (money, injury, age) reasons.

The Play is just an easy, lazy target for a far more complicated cycle of events (overpaying vets, bad trades, bad drafts, poor coaching, defense heavy contracts, poor teammates). hell, if anything, its just part of a much larger cycle, rather than being THE issue.

It's reductive (and honestly narrow minded) to find blame in one side of any of this. But it's not one play, regardless of that play's significance. This was always a teeter-totter over a cache of dynamite. When perfectly balanced it was a great thing. But it was always delicate... and fleeting.

[emoji1312]...completely nailed it.. great post


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP
hawksincebirth

hawksincebirth

Active member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
776
Reaction score
92
Location
Marysville
Uncle Si":2tzk5xie said:
All those players were here the year after the loss and got hammered by the Panthers in the playoffs.

Were they so dumbstruck by that loss that they pulled it together for a season only to REALLY let it bother them in the playoffs?

Come on.. people are stronger than that. They snuck into that Super Bowl to begin with. they had a great run to end the regular season with historic QB play the year after and got bullied by a better Panthers team. That's where it started to unravel. A lot of people think that way, too.

And let's say they 3-peat. Where are those players today, which is what i was asking? they're still hurt, old, gone. Why would an aging, injured Sherman with a bad wheel and 11 million be any more tantalizing to the team with a Super Bowl win then without it? Bennett the same. You think winning was going to suddenly resolve their attitudes?

The Play tarnished a legacy. It's impact on the team now is probably a bit more complicated then "its the reason we suck"

I can buy the morale thing, but still... none to a couple of the aforementioned players would be here for a variety (money, injury, age) reasons.

The Play is just an easy, lazy target for a far more complicated cycle of events (overpaying vets, bad trades, bad drafts, poor coaching, defense heavy contracts, poor teammates). hell, if anything, its just part of a much larger cycle, rather than being THE issue.

It's reductive (and honestly narrow minded) to find blame in one side of any of this. But it's not one play, regardless of that play's significance. This was always a teeter-totter over a cache of dynamite. When perfectly balanced it was a great thing. But it was always delicate... and fleeting.

Immortalized in sports history and arguably the best team ever ... that’s where
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
Still nothing to do with the current state of the team. Which... was the point.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,342
Reaction score
1,863
Uncle Si":1ks6scqo said:
Still nothing to do with the current state of the team. Which... was the point.

I see what your saying and where your going Si, but I think if that play never happened, we still have Sherman and Bennett and the defense would be better off. Just my opinion.
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
pittpnthrs":1te4z6tf said:
Uncle Si":1te4z6tf said:
Still nothing to do with the current state of the team. Which... was the point.

I see what your saying and where your going Si, but I think if that play never happened, we still have Sherman and Bennett and the defense would be better off. Just my opinion.

Yeah, it's an unknown. And maybe with them the defense (and team) is better off.

But... they were on the team the last two years and the wheels were wobbling (why the notion of a 3-peat is absurd in my opinion). They can assign that to "the play" but it they were getting blown out in the NFC championship game before it. were on a roll heading into the playoffs the year after.

It seems to only rear its head when things dont go well. Which tells me the players focused on it were struggling with something else all together and form that, I cant see how success or failure was going to make much difference long term.
 
OP
OP
hawksincebirth

hawksincebirth

Active member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
776
Reaction score
92
Location
Marysville
Uncle Si":143kvl8t said:
pittpnthrs":143kvl8t said:
Uncle Si":143kvl8t said:
Still nothing to do with the current state of the team. Which... was the point.

I see what your saying and where your going Si, but I think if that play never happened, we still have Sherman and Bennett and the defense would be better off. Just my opinion.

Yeah, it's an unknown. And maybe with them the defense (and team) is better off.

But... they were on the team the last two years and the wheels were wobbling (why the notion of a 3-peat is absurd in my opinion). They can assign that to "the play" but it they were getting blown out in the NFC championship game before it. were on a roll heading into the playoffs the year after.

It seems to only rear its head when things dont go well. Which tells me the players focused on it were struggling with something else all together and form that, I cant see how success or failure was going to make much difference long term.

It’s kinda like a toxic relationship yea the sex may be great, but it’s not gonna Work.. Morale and that play cost pete the teams trust and lost his dynasty ultimately
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
hawksincebirth":2sqn7qt8 said:
Uncle Si":2sqn7qt8 said:
pittpnthrs":2sqn7qt8 said:
Uncle Si":2sqn7qt8 said:
Still nothing to do with the current state of the team. Which... was the point.

I see what your saying and where your going Si, but I think if that play never happened, we still have Sherman and Bennett and the defense would be better off. Just my opinion.

Yeah, it's an unknown. And maybe with them the defense (and team) is better off.

But... they were on the team the last two years and the wheels were wobbling (why the notion of a 3-peat is absurd in my opinion). They can assign that to "the play" but it they were getting blown out in the NFC championship game before it. were on a roll heading into the playoffs the year after.

It seems to only rear its head when things dont go well. Which tells me the players focused on it were struggling with something else all together and form that, I cant see how success or failure was going to make much difference long term.

It’s kinda like a toxic relationship yea the sex may be great, but it’s not gonna Work.. Morale and that play cost pete the teams trust and lost his dynasty ultimately

I dont think "that play" was the issue why PC, Wilson and the defense's relationship turned toxic. It was probably always going to go that way. The play is an easy target. They were yelling at each other long before that. What would have happened if they dont recover the on-side kick? You think the defense wouldve been quiet about the INTs in the NFC championship loss?

And while it cost them back to back Super Bowls, the play was in the rear view mirror until they got shit canned by the Panthers.

It was a matter of time. Winning just kept things in balance.
 
OP
OP
hawksincebirth

hawksincebirth

Active member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
776
Reaction score
92
Location
Marysville
Uncle Si":3tfhhm1l said:
hawksincebirth":3tfhhm1l said:
Uncle Si":3tfhhm1l said:
pittpnthrs":3tfhhm1l said:
I see what your saying and where your going Si, but I think if that play never happened, we still have Sherman and Bennett and the defense would be better off. Just my opinion.

Yeah, it's an unknown. And maybe with them the defense (and team) is better off.

But... they were on the team the last two years and the wheels were wobbling (why the notion of a 3-peat is absurd in my opinion). They can assign that to "the play" but it they were getting blown out in the NFC championship game before it. were on a roll heading into the playoffs the year after.

It seems to only rear its head when things dont go well. Which tells me the players focused on it were struggling with something else all together and form that, I cant see how success or failure was going to make much difference long term.

It’s kinda like a toxic relationship yea the sex may be great, but it’s not gonna Work.. Morale and that play cost pete the teams trust and lost his dynasty ultimately

I dont think "that play" was the issue why PC, Wilson and the defense's relationship turned toxic. It was probably always going to go that way. The play is an easy target. They were yelling at each other long before that. What would have happened if they dont recover the on-side kick? You think the defense wouldve been quiet about the INTs in the NFC championship loss?

And while it cost them back to back Super Bowls, the play was in the rear view mirror until they got shit canned by the Panthers.

It was a matter of time. Winning just kept things in balance.
More and more players have confirmed it .. the play cost us everything. Pete’s buy in .. respect for Wilson .. everything all lit the door . Done. Nail in coffin pete killed it
 
Top