djTOY2000
New member
....these bad boys go on sale at a drastically low price at the team's pro shop .. (isn't that the trend over the years ??)
Chukarhawk":1wvf4c19 said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Throwdown":2clxmirh said:Chukarhawk":2clxmirh said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Its not illogical, its not like home boy is Steve Young waiting in the wings. He's Matt Friggin Flynn, he's a luxury, not an asset.
Throwdown":2qm9xdkw said:Chukarhawk":2qm9xdkw said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Its not illogical, its not like home boy is Steve Young waiting in the wings. He's Matt Friggin Flynn, he's a luxury, not an asset.
NoChops":7kleq0rb said:Throwdown":7kleq0rb said:Chukarhawk":7kleq0rb said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Its not illogical, its not like home boy is Steve Young waiting in the wings. He's Matt Friggin Flynn, he's a luxury, not an asset.
but with russell baggins making 300K its no skin off our backs either way.
Zebulon Dak":2babqvmx said:We might cut Flynn. Especially if we bring in a rookie who then wins the backup job in preseason and we can't find any trade suitors for Flynn. You think we'd keep Flynn as the 3rd stringer? Nooope.
kidhawk":1q9m08fq said:Zebulon Dak":1q9m08fq said:We might cut Flynn. Especially if we bring in a rookie who then wins the backup job in preseason and we can't find any trade suitors for Flynn. You think we'd keep Flynn as the 3rd stringer? Nooope.
We found a sucker for T-jack and you think we'd have trouble trading Flynn? That's the definition of insanity right there
NoChops":2xllmkiw said:Throwdown":2xllmkiw said:Chukarhawk":2xllmkiw said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Its not illogical, its not like home boy is Steve Young waiting in the wings. He's Matt Friggin Flynn, he's a luxury, not an asset.
but with russell baggins making 300K its no skin off our backs either way.
kidhawk":2b4m7w8r said:Throwdown":2b4m7w8r said:Chukarhawk":2b4m7w8r said:Were not cutting Flynn. Will never,ever in a million years happen. Completely illogical.
Its not illogical, its not like home boy is Steve Young waiting in the wings. He's Matt Friggin Flynn, he's a luxury, not an asset.
There is a difference between illogical and impossible. It is illogical to believe we will just release him, especially considering we were able to get something for Jackson last year. It wouldn't be LOGICAL that we'd get something for Jackson and not for Flynn.
It is POSSIBLE we release Flynn, but that's not the most likely course of action and would fly in the face of what seems logical.
Why would Flynn agree to restructure his contract for less than he would make on the open market? For the pleasure of backing up Wilson? The Players Association would never allow it either.garydrake425":20sbgivb said:Why can't we restructure his contract to either make it more trade friendly or get it closer to backup money. I just keep seeing this happen on teams and don't hear a thing about Flynn even being able to. Why is this?