The Boz & #44

652cHAWK

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
888
Reaction score
0

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
22,952
Reaction score
2,774
Location
Anchorage, AK
HawkFan72":3ibirgrn said:
I can't believe he got a real restraining order to wear the number. Hilarious.

If I remember correctly he (&r the team) also lied about the fact that he'd be a part-time TE to get the number assigned in the first place. It was only after he played zero snaps on offense that the NFL pulled the plug on him wearing that number.
 

HOLLYWOOD

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
842
Reaction score
0
Location
Closer than you think...
You are correct kidhawk. I was always hoping they would allow him to wear 44. The Bo Jackson play would have been different dammit! Not really but...
 

SeatownJay

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
10,745
Reaction score
6
Location
Hagerstown, MD
kidhawk":82ou5qrq said:
HawkFan72":82ou5qrq said:
I can't believe he got a real restraining order to wear the number. Hilarious.

If I remember correctly he (&r the team) also lied about the fact that he'd be a part-time TE to get the number assigned in the first place. It was only after he played zero snaps on offense that the NFL pulled the plug on him wearing that number.
DB, not TE. The Seahawks said they might list him as a safety so he could legally wear #44.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Don't even get me started on Bosworth...

I have my issues about how that player was handled from a coaching standpoint, and from a strength and conditioning standpoint. Back in those days, the correct amount of money and/or emphasis was certainly not paid to keep players healthy physically, let alone mentally.

Had Bosworth worn some of the cool-ass shoulder pads and braces they have now, and had access to the nutritional, and weight-room training, and even the mental health stuff the team has now, he would have been our version of Ray Lewis. As it turns out, ownership didn't invest in what they needed to keep any player healthy, and it showed.

All through the 80's in particular.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,136
Reaction score
1,527
Location
Spokane
DB, not TE. The Seahawks said they might list him as a safety so he could legally wear #44.


Actually they toyed with the idea of a new position (if only in name) of Monster DB. It obviously didn't fly.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
kidhawk":zasdfewd said:
HawkFan72":zasdfewd said:
I can't believe he got a real restraining order to wear the number. Hilarious.

If I remember correctly he (&r the team) also lied about the fact that he'd be a part-time TE to get the number assigned in the first place. It was only after he played zero snaps on offense that the NFL pulled the plug on him wearing that number.

They tried to call him a "Monster DB" so he could keep the number.
 

razor150

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
2,078
Reaction score
0
HoustonHawk82":tje23zp4 said:
Don't even get me started on Bosworth...

I have my issues about how that player was handled from a coaching standpoint, and from a strength and conditioning standpoint. Back in those days, the correct amount of money and/or emphasis was certainly not paid to keep players healthy physically, let alone mentally.

Had Bosworth worn some of the cool-ass shoulder pads and braces they have now, and had access to the nutritional, and weight-room training, and even the mental health stuff the team has now, he would have been our version of Ray Lewis. As it turns out, ownership didn't invest in what they needed to keep any player healthy, and it showed.

All through the 80's in particular.

Kenny Easley paid the price of the team having such bad medical staff. It is insane that they had to trade hin to find out his kidneys were failing due to all the drugs they were putting in him.
 

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
4,486
Reaction score
1,298
44 Blues was his company. That is why he wanted 44.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
oldhawkfan":31omquv4 said:
.
DB, not TE. The Seahawks said they might list him as a safety so he could legally wear #44.


Actually they toyed with the idea of a new position (if only in name) of Monster DB. It obviously didn't fly.
This is exactly it!
 

JaiSeaSea

New member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
onanygivensunday":2ivhfowd said:
If that new rule flies then the Hawks can retire Boz's #44.

LMAO

idk why i never did before.... I'm getting one. I was 16 or so when he came to the Hawks and I was extremely excited.

love the BOZ and I defend him every chance I hear someone call him a bust or bring up the Bo Jackson play. Love Bo too btw.

EDIT: check the sig
 

SeahawkFrost

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
385
Reaction score
0
Location
Shelton
seabowl":1i0aqh2o said:
44 Blues was his company. That is why he wanted 44.
Actually that was his number in college and he didn't start with the 44 blues until the NFL said he couldn't wear 44 anymore. At least that's my recollection.
 

seahawkfreak

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
5,447
Reaction score
0
Location
Aiken , SC
I remember Julian Peterson wanting the number 44 as well. I believe he stated that he wanted everyone to know that he could still run a 4.4 40.
 

evergreen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
1,237
Reaction score
447
Mike McCormick labeled him a monster DB. Remember how pissed fredd brown was that the Boz got all that $$$?
 

TheHawkster

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
1
Location
Puyallup
Boz's tiny hands are clapping right now.
Meanwhile, his tiny feet are taking him to the set of a less than B rated movie.
 
Top