Anyone see Russell Wilson on Jimmy Kimmel

hawknation2015

New member
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
5,439
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, Washington
No but you can watch some of the clips from the interview here:
http://abc.go.com/shows/jimmy-kimmel-li ... 0_edfflwtu

Edit -- Just watched it. Actually a pretty entertaining interview. Seahawk fans sounded loud even there, though Russell said the crowd noise at CenturyLink wasn't much of an adjustment after playing at Wisconsin and NC State. Russell was asked whether he wanted to be the highest paid player in football and responded that he wanted to be paid based on his play. Most awkward moment was Russell's joke that Carroll paid his players at USC, which fell flat with the L.A. audience. Overall, Russell looked a little more comfortable in this interview setting than he did a year ago.
 

hawksmode

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
0
Location
Washington
hawknation2015":1apooyj8 said:
No but you can watch some of the clips from the interview here:
http://abc.go.com/shows/jimmy-kimmel-li ... 0_edfflwtu

Edit -- Just watched it. Actually a pretty entertaining interview. Seahawk fans sounded loud even there, though Russell said the crowd noise at CenturyLink wasn't much of an adjustment after playing at Wisconsin and NC State. Russell was asked whether he wanted to be the highest paid player in football and responded that he wanted to be paid based on his play. Most awkward moment was Russell's joke that Carroll paid his players at USC, which fell flat with the L.A. audience. Overall, Russell looked a little more comfortable in this interview setting than he did a year ago.


Perfect, so is he giving some back for costing us the SB?

Kidding....( kind a )
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,823
Reaction score
1,791
hawksmode":14ncn8za said:
hawknation2015":14ncn8za said:
No but you can watch some of the clips from the interview here:
http://abc.go.com/shows/jimmy-kimmel-li ... 0_edfflwtu

Edit -- Just watched it. Actually a pretty entertaining interview. Seahawk fans sounded loud even there, though Russell said the crowd noise at CenturyLink wasn't much of an adjustment after playing at Wisconsin and NC State. Russell was asked whether he wanted to be the highest paid player in football and responded that he wanted to be paid based on his play. Most awkward moment was Russell's joke that Carroll paid his players at USC, which fell flat with the L.A. audience. Overall, Russell looked a little more comfortable in this interview setting than he did a year ago.


Perfect, so is he giving some back for costing us the SB?

Kidding....( kind a )

With your avatar, you're touting the "NFC CHAMPIONS Back To Back", for which Russell Wilson played a BIG part in helping to get us those trophies in the first place.
I don't suppose you think Coach Bevell had anything to do with that particular costly play-call?
 

Rocket

Active member
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
3,056
Reaction score
0
Location
The Rain Forest
scutterhawk":1v64za3f said:
I don't suppose you think Coach Bevell had anything to do with that particular costly play-call?
And that is the $64,000.00 question. :th2thumbs:
 

Dang3Russ

New member
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Still haven't seen it, but will as soon as I get home.

Russ is awesome to watch in interviews and press conferences. He just knows how to speak.

Also, pay the man!!!
 

Hawk-Lock

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
5,312
Reaction score
565
Yeah that was pretty awkward when Russ joked that Pete paid for players at USC. I think right after he said it, he realized what he just said.
 

SeatownJay

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
10,745
Reaction score
6
Location
Hagerstown, MD
Wilson also mentioned that he'd seriously consider playing both football & baseball if the Rangers traded his rights to the Mariners.
 

Hawk-Lock

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
5,312
Reaction score
565
SeatownJay":1crfnslc said:
Wilson also mentioned that he'd seriously consider playing both football & baseball if the Rangers traded his rights to the Mariners.

Please no. I love Russell as a football player, but he would not help the Mariners at all. Mariners already have enough hitting problems. Wasn't Russell like a career .220 hitter in single A?

I also found it interesting that Russell kind of made a joke about his baseball abilities, comparing it to Jimmy Kimmel's softball abilities. Seems like Russell has lightened up a bit. That could be the Ciara effect.
 

Siouxhawk

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
3,776
Reaction score
0
Didn't he also say Andy Sandberg soiled himself in the Green Room?
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
Siouxhawk":2s9gtb4m said:
Didn't he also say Andy Sandberg soiled himself in the Green Room?

Believe it was a reference to this:

[youtube]4pXfHLUlZf4[/youtube]
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
Good interview, but a lot of awkward moments. There were actually a lot of good jokes in there that went over the audience's heads unfortunately. I actually liked the Sandberg jab at Carroll's "prank" at the end of the SB.
 

KiwiHawk

New member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
1
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
scutterhawk":1ywepde9 said:
With your avatar, you're touting the "NFC CHAMPIONS Back To Back", for which Russell Wilson played a BIG part in helping to get us those trophies in the first place.
Like throwing 4 interceptions and posting a 13.6 QBR in the last one? If it wasn't for our defense mitigating the damage of that disastrous first half, and Green Bay somehow managing to wrest defeat from the jaws of victory, we wouldn't have won last year.

Wilson played a BIG part in digging us a massive HOLE in that game. Wilson had very little to do with us winning the NFCCG last year.

In the first half, green Bay had scoring drives of 18, 22, 56, and 11 yards. If you told me an Aaron Rodgers-led team only managed 13 points out of that field position, I'd find it hard to believe. But each time we turned the ball over INSIDE FIELD GOAL RANGE, our defense held Green Bay to just a field goal. That's how good our defense was that day.

It was our defense, not Wilson, that had a BIG part in helping us win BOTH those trophies. Or do you also forget The Tip and the several 4th-quarter turnovers that our offense failed to convert against SF?
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
8,972
Reaction score
1,630
Location
Eastern Washington
Rocket":2vnax97x said:
scutterhawk":2vnax97x said:
I don't suppose you think Coach Bevell had anything to do with that particular costly play-call?
And that is the $64,000.00 question. :th2thumbs:
I think it's probably worth a tad more than that.
 

erik2690

New member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
356
Reaction score
0
KiwiHawk":2vzb330a said:
scutterhawk":2vzb330a said:
With your avatar, you're touting the "NFC CHAMPIONS Back To Back", for which Russell Wilson played a BIG part in helping to get us those trophies in the first place.
Like throwing 4 interceptions and posting a 13.6 QBR in the last one? If it wasn't for our defense mitigating the damage of that disastrous first half, and Green Bay somehow managing to wrest defeat from the jaws of victory, we wouldn't have won last year.

Wilson played a BIG part in digging us a massive HOLE in that game. Wilson had very little to do with us winning the NFCCG last year.

In the first half, green Bay had scoring drives of 18, 22, 56, and 11 yards. If you told me an Aaron Rodgers-led team only managed 13 points out of that field position, I'd find it hard to believe. But each time we turned the ball over INSIDE FIELD GOAL RANGE, our defense held Green Bay to just a field goal. That's how good our defense was that day.

It was our defense, not Wilson, that had a BIG part in helping us win BOTH those trophies. Or do you also forget The Tip and the several 4th-quarter turnovers that our offense failed to convert against SF?


So you are under the impression that 'played a BIG part in helping to get us those trophies' means purely that 1 game where we actually receive the trophy? You have to be in that game to even have a chance. So he could have played like shit for the first 17, but if he had been a beast that game you would credit him with a 'BIG part in helping to get us those trophies'? That logic seems flawed to me. Very flawed honestly. I would argue he did have a big part in getting us there and still agree he played very badly in the GB game. I don't think those are mutually exclusive at all.
 
Top