Evil_Shenanigans":1iz24359 said:
StoneCold":1iz24359 said:
Also in his list of safeties he mixes strong and free safeties which are not paid the same.
Thats the sticking point. He is a Strong Safety and he seems to want to be paid as a Free Safety (or better) apparently. Sound Familiar? Our own Jimmy Graham lobbying to be paid as a WR rather than a TE not so long ago. Both have compelling arguments I grant you. But if I am wearing my John Schneider hat, I am saying "your one year into an extension we all agreed to. You are coming off a serious injury that you may or may not be fully healed from, your not getting any younger and we have this pesky salary cap to deal with. See me next year!"
Why shouldn't he?
He's being asked to put his body on the line more than any other player on the defense. He's being asked to lower the Boom over the middle. What's the history of hard hitting SS's like Easley, Hamlin, etc?
Injury shortened careers.
Yet that's exactly what they're asking Chancellor to do. A man deserves to get paid extra for that. He's going to have the shortest effective career. When he can't do it anymore, he'll be replaced by someone else who will have a shortened career.
It's not about SS vs FS, it's about the role our SS's have. All our SS's should be getting paid more. That they're not is because the system doesn't have to adjust, they've locked in positions. Kam may have no chance at winning, but there's an argument to be made that the role you play is more important than the position you play. Graham tried to prove something similar to that and lost in arbitration (or did that go to court?). Sort of lost, anyways. He got paid.
Sadly, it's time to play football now and it's time to admit defeat. Kam has to swallow his pride and not be bigger than the team. He's still getting paid 7m a year. If Kam, ET and Sherm compared their paychecks, at this point in time, Kam has been paid more.