"Predictabevell"

And go.

Fire Bevell. Not sure how many times this has to be said. Our offense is so predictable. That's the missing link. Well, that and our O line.

Go Hawks!

That call was awful, and we all knew it was coming.

You'll never get Pete to listen. If a blown Super Bowl isn't enough to remove him, Pete will have no problem throwing away this season to indulge Bevell.

USC 2.0

Online suck BALLS. should have picked up satele and Mathis. Fred jackson? Come on. Last I checked fj doesn't play on the online

Same ol idoit bevell offense .... Two fullbacks on the roster and were NEVER put in the game ... idiot same ol shit from him and pete as well

FanSince82":1y3cazao said:

You'll never get Pete to listen. If a blown Super Bowl isn't enough to remove him, Pete will throw this season away indulging Bevell.

USC 2.0

Click to expand...

Pathetic

Can't disagree with this. The redzone offense is pretty poor. Just got 1 TD in many chances. Bevell's playcalling in the redzone is atrocious. The Rams converted there redzone opportunities. Doesn't help if OL stinks either. The Seahawk OL stunk and were outplayed by the Rams OL.

Yep. When I am sitting here watching the game and am accurately predicting 50% of the plays or more, you know the Rams are likely predicting far more than that. Horrible & painful to watch. If they're going to make it obvious that they're running, at least get in a formation that gives us the best opportunity to succeed; You're not fooling anyone Bevell. This was a difficult game to watch.

We could score 50 points and people would still blame it on Bevell.

Nevermind that our LBs messed the bed and Carroll handed Fisher an OT field goal.

DavidSeven":3oacp8gs said:

We could score 50 points and people would still blame it on Bevell.

Nevermind that our LBs messed the bed and Carroll handed Fisher an OT field goal.

Click to expand...

If Bevell would use his weapons in the red zone and maybe some rub plays and less empty backfield sets to put a question in a defense's thoughts about what was coming we would not have threads like this.

DavidSeven":1gajjkp8 said:

We could score 50 points and people would still blame it on Bevell.

Nevermind that our LBs messed the bed and Carroll handed Fisher an OT field goal.

Click to expand...

Yeah cause 4 of those TDs will be from the defense.

Im tired of seeing completed passes.. behind the LOS the result is a lot of the time a Loss of Yards. Bevell enjoys it.

chris98251":33vxf6fb said:

DavidSeven":33vxf6fb said:

We could score 50 points and people would still blame it on Bevell.

Nevermind that our LBs messed the bed and Carroll handed Fisher an OT field goal.

Click to expand...

If Bevell would use his weapons in the red zone and maybe some rub plays and less empty backfield sets to put a question in a defense's thoughts about what was coming we would not have threads like this.

Click to expand...

Exactly. All I hear is that we're a power run team first. Really?

Was the FB in the backfield more then 10 plays this game? I don't think it's even close.

Run, play action, run, deep ball.

This is what the offense does when it's successful.

This team has an empty backfield more than the Packers with Rodgers. Now I understand that he's trying to spread out that defensive line...but the bubble screen crap doesn't work every other play. How about a screen pass to the RB to attack the hard rush? Y'know the play they used against our attacking front and racked up close to 100 yards with.

I just don't get the identity of this offense. Especially in the redzone. Holy hell these guys lock up tight and look like deer caught in the headlights every single time. We start out thinking ourselves and trying these insane spread single back or no back formations. How about you put the FB back there and run some play action off that and have Jimmy matched up with a LB.

He sure seems to love putting the ball in the hands of receivers behind the line of scrimmage. Which NEVER WORKS. Anyone want to bet he's practicing jet sweeps with Lockett? (Which will then result in 3rd and 15 and he'll call for Beast Mode up the gut.)

hawkporvida":18c69w39 said:

Same ol idoit bevell offense .... Two fullbacks on the roster and were NEVER put in the game ... idiot same ol shit from him and pete as well

Click to expand...

Wrong Forum for this kind of language :141847_bnono:

White Devil":zhx9gebw said:

Exactly. All I hear is that we're a power run team first. Really?

Click to expand...

We are not a power run team. Our OL is lighter than any in the league. We aren't overpowering anyone, especially not St. Louis.

DavidSeven":3szyhbgv said:

We could score 50 points and people would still blame it on Bevell.

Nevermind that our LBs messed the bed and Carroll handed Fisher an OT field goal.

Click to expand...

And just ONE TD conversion in the red zone instead of a FG, and we don't lose the game by 3 points in OT. The blame goes everywhere, but Bevell is terrible at making adjustments. We keep running the same dumb running plays when our OL can't handle the players in those gaps, yet when Wilson starts throwing quick 5 yard passes against blitzes, we make them pay.

They obviously run blitzed a lot this game and we didn't make them pay once. Some of that can be on Wilson not seeing this and audibling out (if he's allowed to), but there has to be some sideline adjustments.

I honestly don't understand how we have a 6'5" WR and a 6'7" TE with huge catch radiuses, and yet the Rams can throw 6 and one time 7 rushers at the QB and we can't find a way to make them pay.

Those early FGs are on Russ, IMO. We can draw up plays to big targets all day, but Russ has to let it go and stop double clutching every play until the 4th quarter.

Bev-hell