Would you give up a LOB OG for Dallas' OL?

AROS · Oct 7, 2015

Silly question but it's Hump Day so who cares? :lol:

kobebryant · Oct 7, 2015

Nope, we know first hand that this secondary can be a catalyst towards championships.

We don't know that about Dallas' oline.

MontanaHawk05 · Oct 7, 2015

I saw what happened when we lost even one Legion member for two games.

I also haven't seen Dallas in any Super Bowls lately.

Sports Hernia · Oct 7, 2015

Williams, Simon, Shead yes. The main 3, no.
Of course *allas wouldn't do what I suggested.

theENGLISHseahawk · Oct 7, 2015

You mean the Dallas offensive line that currently has Tony Romo sidelined with a shoulder injury?

RussB · Oct 7, 2015

Heck no. You cant replace those guys in the LOB. almost every one of them is the best in the league at their position

Cartire · Oct 7, 2015

I'd give up Sherm for 5 Starting OL from Dallas.

Yea, I said, come at me.

AROS · Oct 7, 2015

Cartire":t1wmx0vd said:
I'd give up Sherm for 5 Starting OL from Dallas.

Yea, I said, come at me.

I feel ya. As much as I say keep the OG LOB together until they can no longer be (due to injury/finances) I would consider this. Absolutely.

Let 'em come at both of us.

seahawks51usc · Oct 7, 2015

Sherm for Tyron Smith, Travis Frederick, Zach Martin and La'el Collins? yes i would do it

An O-line of T. Smith, L. Collins, T. Frederick, Z. Martin and G. Gilliam would completely change our team.

Sgt. Largent · Oct 7, 2015

LOB? No.

But I would trade Wright + Irvin and just about any of our young up and coming defensive players like Hill, KPL, Marsh, etc.

AROS · Oct 7, 2015

This is a delicate topic and why I posted it. There's a feeling in 12 Nation that if you even suggest on a message board that you would trade one of our sacred players away for a dominate OL somehow your 12 Card would be revoked. This is why I think we won't find 100% honesty in this thread. The default response is NEVER but if you are being completely truthful, you would certainly consider - and presumptuously I presume - letting one of those greats go if it means a SEVERE increase in offensive production and the preservation and maximum performance of one Russell Wilson to do what he is capable of doing on all cylinders.

If I stated the ENTIRE LOB for Dallas' OL then I know it would be 100% NO. But that's not the question. Would you let one of them go for that entire beast of an OL? I think if I sat each of you down, in a dark corner, with a drink or two under your belt I think we know the answer.

DavidSeven · Oct 7, 2015

A five-for-one trade scenario is not really a realistic question. You could pick up any single player in the league with that offer. Presenting it this way stacks the deck against our own guys.

If you flipped it, the only singular players who couldn't be had for a Sherman/Thomas/Chancellor bundle are maybe Aaron Rodgers and Andrew Luck. Houston would put JJ Watt on the first flight to Seattle if we came at them with this offer.

AROS · Oct 7, 2015

DavidSeven":k3i6bmx6 said:
A five-for-one trade scenario is not really a realistic question. You could pick up any single player in the league with that offer. Presenting it this way stacks the deck against our own guys.

If you flipped it, the only singular players who couldn't be had for a Sherman/Thomas/Chancellor bundle are maybe Aaron Rodgers and Andrew Luck. Houston would put JJ Watt on the first flight to Seattle if we came at them with this offer.

Well of course it's not realistic, it is a fan message board after all where we are entitled to have nonsensical threads to keep us entertained throughout the week. So not sure why you feel the need to point that element of it out but okay I'll work with ya.

OkieHawk · Oct 7, 2015

Aros":qw0fuyfo said:
This is a delicate topic and why I posted it. There's a feeling in 12 Nation that if you even suggest on a message board that you would trade one of our sacred players away for a dominate OL somehow your 12 Card would be revoked. This is why I think we won't find 100% honesty in this thread. The default response is NEVER but if you are being completely truthful, you would certainly consider - and presumptuously I presume - letting one of those greats go if it means a SEVERE increase in offensive production and the preservation and maximum performance of one Russell Wilson to do what he is capable of doing on all cylinders.

If I stated the ENTIRE LOB for Dallas' OL then I know it would be 100% NO. But that's not the question. Would you let one of them go for that entire beast of an OL? I think if I sat each of you down, in a dark corner, with a drink or two under your belt I think we know the answer.

I say hell no simply because it would never happen. Even trading one LOB member for an elite OL talent wouldn't be an even trade IMO. Pete and JS made this bed, and we are stuck with it unfortunately, and no trade would magically make our OL better right now.

Seahawk Sailor · Oct 7, 2015

Also, and perhaps unrelatedly, it appears Richard Sherman has recently refused the advances of three people on this site.

AROS · Oct 7, 2015

Oh for Pete's Sakes play along people! It ain't gonna cause Herpes! (Well it will in Pehawk)

Rocket · Oct 7, 2015

Aros":ove8e624 said:
Cartire":ove8e624 said:

I'd give up Sherm for 5 Starting OL from Dallas.

Yea, I said, come at me.

Click to expand...

I feel ya. As much as I say keep the OG LOB together until they can no longer be (due to injury/finances) I would consider this. Absolutely.

Let 'em come at both of us.

Three...

Cartire · Oct 7, 2015

DavidSeven":343csawe said:
A five-for-one trade scenario is not really a realistic question. You could pick up any single player in the league with that offer. Presenting it this way stacks the deck against our own guys.

If you flipped it, the only singular players who couldn't be had for a Sherman/Thomas/Chancellor bundle are maybe Aaron Rodgers and Andrew Luck. Houston would put JJ Watt on the first flight to Seattle if we came at them with this offer.

Very true, so I'll heighten the deal.

I would trade Sherm for Zac Martin and any one of the remaining 4 lineman. A 1 for 2 trade.

Hawkpower · Oct 7, 2015

Tough call.

We have won a Super Bowl with our Secondary in tact and a terrible offensive line.

We dont know if we could win a Super Bowl with a weaker secondary and a better offensive line.

So, I guess I side with the known.

Rocket · Oct 7, 2015

Think what our exiting line could LEARN from the Boys from Dallas™.
Funny how all four of us picked Sherm to leave and not Earl nor Kam.

Would you give up a LOB OG for Dallas' OL?

Would you give up a LOB OG for the Dallas OL?

Nope. LOB FOREVER!!

Yes. I would give up Kam.

Yes. I would give up Earl.

Yes. I would give up Sherm.

Administrator

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Active member

New member

New member

Administrator

New member

Well-known member

Administrator

New member

Administrator

New member

Active member

Administrator

Active member

New member

Well-known member

Active member

Similar threads