timmat
Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2014
- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 0
I wonder why? I thought maybe he was hurt, but he was in on the second possession. Not exactly the right time to give a guy a blow.
First Possession Of OT - No Rawls
- Thread starter timmat
- Start date
Exittium
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 3,043
- Reaction score
- 10
1 word : Bevell
DavidSeven
New member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- 0
They were in no huddle. Can't sub personnel, and Jackson plays 3rd down so you have to keep him in for the other downs.
SeatownJay
Active member
Post game Pete said they decided to stick with their hurry up offense for overtime, which is why Jackson was in there instead of Rawls.
HawkerD
Active member
Should have stuck with it in 4th qtrSeatownJay":11ecrbrp said:
Cyrus12
Well-known member
Bevell trying to mind f%%^ the Bengals!! Boy whatta coach! How has no one made this guy a head coach yet??
Spin Doctor
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,237
- Reaction score
- 2,165
Hue Jackson??? If you're talking about Hue Jackson he was the head coach for the Raiders for a short stint.Cyrus12":3klxibtv said:
WindCityHawk
New member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,502
- Reaction score
- 0
So Pete's explanation was that they stuck with the hurry up AFTER they went to OT? When the clock was at 15:00 and they had two timeouts and they should have put their best players forward?
Maybe Pete deserves more of this Bevell hate than I thought.
Maybe Pete deserves more of this Bevell hate than I thought.
WmHBonney
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,732
- Reaction score
- 1,006
Fred looked terrible. He couldn't plant and cut at all. He never should have been in there.
Tokadub
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Messages
- 964
- Reaction score
- 12
WmHBonney":37si2lja said:
And yet Fred in the receiving game went 3/3 for 29 yards, more effective than Jimmy Graham 3/5 for 30 yards (one of his targets being the interception).
Mistashoesta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,695
- Reaction score
- 1,254
Cyrus12":6wwsnfgs said:
The Cardinals came close, then they took the barrel out of their mouths.
seahawkfreak
New member
Is he that important on third down?DavidSeven":1k19i87f said:
imnKOgnito
Active member
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 0
Wasn't the hurry up earlier in the game when Wilson threw an interception into double coverage? Dumb decision for OT. The game is new. Go with what got you there. Another case of our offense being cute instead of efficient.
Armchair Bronco
New member
Both Carroll and Bevell deserve a goat award for replacing a red-hot Rawls at the end of the game with an ineffective Jackson.
Another example of over-thinking things...YET again!!!
"Let's see...we have a guy with 160 yards and a TD chewing through Cincy. Conventional wisdom says we stick with him...But Cincy will expect that! So we're going to trick them by plugging in an injured and ineffective Fred Jackson!"
The biggest problem facing this team is HUBRIS by the coaching staff!!
Another example of over-thinking things...YET again!!!
"Let's see...we have a guy with 160 yards and a TD chewing through Cincy. Conventional wisdom says we stick with him...But Cincy will expect that! So we're going to trick them by plugging in an injured and ineffective Fred Jackson!"
The biggest problem facing this team is HUBRIS by the coaching staff!!
Armchair Bronco":35w54gyo said:
It's irksome. I get those who don't want to persecute Pete and Bevell over it, I do. You're probably the "right" person here.
But there's a pattern here of not going with the best guy in the biggest situations. Jackson has a high ankle sprain. Rawls was busting big gainers. Going away from him seems stupid to me, unless he was hurt or totally out of gas--which is possible.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Mike MacDonald removes Carroll related Seahawks imprint- Latest: CactusJack
-
-
-
-
-
