Kam PI was BS

Year of The Hawk · Jan 10, 2016

The receiver ran into him. He was standing in position. Such BS. At least we won.

andyh64000 · Jan 10, 2016

Yep...the missed FG was karma.

hawknation2015 · Jan 10, 2016

Poetic justice

getnasty · Jan 10, 2016

He got beat on a double move, that was pi

Marlin Man · Jan 10, 2016

Ya ever wonder HOW a ref could possibly throw a game??????

Bigpumpkin · Jan 10, 2016

What goes around ....comes around. :3-1:

hawknation2015 · Jan 10, 2016

getnasty":2l5uc0rb said:
He got beat on a double move, that was pi

LOL

Cyrus12 · Jan 10, 2016

Blair Finkle must have felt bad about it and did not want to win with refs help...

NFSeahawks · Jan 10, 2016

It wasn't a penalty by definition of the rule.

Refs missed this because they make fan calls instead of knowing the game.

I still think Kam gets burned way too often against TE's

Year of The Hawk · Jan 10, 2016

NFSeahawks628":3tcyjgk4 said:
It wasn't a penalty by definition of the rule.

Refs missed this because they make fan calls instead of knowing the game.

I still think Kam gets burned way too often against TE's

I am not arguing that just it was a BS call. No need to make his coverage harder with bad officiating when it is weak spot to begin with.

Tech Worlds · Jan 10, 2016

Obvious pass interference

thebanjodude · Jan 10, 2016

I thought it was a PI...

Year of The Hawk · Jan 10, 2016

Tech Worlds":135bespc said:
Obvious pass interference

Why. Kam has right to field as much as the receiver. The receiver ran STRAIGHT INTO HIM. He would have had to jump out of way not to touch him. IMHO it was BS. I don't think it was a personal call against us. I have seen this bad call several times and thought it wasBS then as well.

What could have Kam done?

hawknation2015 · Jan 10, 2016

Tech Worlds":ss069etg said:
Obvious pass interference

Yes . . . offensive pass interference. :th2thumbs:

Jeremy517 · Jan 10, 2016

It wasn't the collision that drew the flag, it was Kam's arm bar when the receiver tried to run away. Call seemed fine.

Year of The Hawk · Jan 10, 2016

hawknation2015":2tozg4cu said:
Tech Worlds":2tozg4cu said:

Obvious pass interference

Click to expand...

Yes . . . offensive pass interference. :th2thumbs:

That would have been more appropriate.

Silver Hawk · Jan 10, 2016

Year of The Hawk":318ggn40 said:
Tech Worlds":318ggn40 said:

Obvious pass interference

Click to expand...

Why. Kam has right to field as much as the receiver. The receiver ran STRAIGHT INTO HIM. He would have had to jump out of way not to touch him. IMHO it was BS. I don't think it was a personal call against us. I have seen this bad call several times and thought it wasBS then as well.

What could have Kam done?

I agree with this. How is it PI when the receiver decides to run right into a defender?

Smellyman · Jan 10, 2016

Nah. it was legit. That will be called on D every time. Kam caught a bit flat footed and Rudolph took advantage. We'd want that call too.

drrew · Jan 10, 2016

Seemed pretty clear that is was defensive PI.

FloridaSeahawk18 · Jan 10, 2016

Rudolph looked like the play from the beginning was to fish for a defensive PI, he ran right into Kam intentionally and knocked him down throwing his hands up like a child.

Reminds me of the Colts game a few years ago were Reggie and TY Hilton whined for PI all game and got one in crunch time.

Kam PI was BS

Well-known member

Active member

New member

Well-known member

New member

Active member

New member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Active member

New member

Well-known member

New member

Member

Well-known member

Member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Similar threads