Brandon Browner took 'millions and ran with it'

Brandon Browner has completed his lengthy transition to heel in the eyes of New Orleans Saints fans.

After posting a picture of himself and fellow Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman on Instagram over the weekend, Browner got into it with fans in the murky waters of the comments section -- not typically a viable solution to anyone's problems

Click to expand...

MizzouHawkGal":2ldz52oc said:

He belongs here and should be a safety. Don't be mad that Seattle convinced him of his true path New Orleans.

@Hawk Nation, your avatar is off the chain. That dog is beautiful.

Click to expand...

El Caliente":20wtpdu1 said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

TAB420":3ofvhluc said:

El Caliente":3ofvhluc said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

I find that hard to believe. You only lose one playoff game a year, and since the Saints won the SB they have only been to the playoffs three times. Seattle bumped them off two of those three times, and one involved one of the biggest run plays in NFL history. I think they remember.

Click to expand...

El Caliente":2fc0i6np said:

TAB420":2fc0i6np said:

El Caliente":2fc0i6np said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

I find that hard to believe. You only lose one playoff game a year, and since the Saints won the SB they have only been to the playoffs three times. Seattle bumped them off two of those three times, and one involved one of the biggest run plays in NFL history. I think they remember.

Click to expand...

Man, we got so many problems right now, do you honestly think we are thinking about a playoff game 3 or 6 years ago? Come on man!

Funny enough, there was a thread on saintsreport.com a few weeks back about the most memorable loss any poster could remember, nobody mentioned either of those games. The loss to the Eagles back in the 1992 playoffs, and the loss to the 49ers in the wild card game in 2011 were brought up, but surprisingly neither Seahawk game was brought up.

Click to expand...

hgwellz12":2ueuxe17 said:

El Caliente":2ueuxe17 said:

TAB420":2ueuxe17 said:

El Caliente":2ueuxe17 said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

I find that hard to believe. You only lose one playoff game a year, and since the Saints won the SB they have only been to the playoffs three times. Seattle bumped them off two of those three times, and one involved one of the biggest run plays in NFL history. I think they remember.

Click to expand...

Man, we got so many problems right now, do you honestly think we are thinking about a playoff game 3 or 6 years ago? Come on man!

Funny enough, there was a thread on saintsreport.com a few weeks back about the most memorable loss any poster could remember, nobody mentioned either of those games. The loss to the Eagles back in the 1992 playoffs, and the loss to the 49ers in the wild card game in 2011 were brought up, but surprisingly neither Seahawk game was brought up.

Click to expand...

Which, if you read between the lines, and are being honest, says a lot. I would hate to even think about that game if I were a Saints fan.

Click to expand...

onanygivensunday":1otvnaq8 said:

What I find somewhat hilarious is the mindset on the Saints board that if Browner succeeds in Seattle it's because our defensive backs are allowed to hold on every play and no other team in the league gets such preferential treatment from the refs.

Such crybabies over there.

Click to expand...

Seattle's Defense Relies On a Brazen Tactic: Rampant Interference

On Saturday, the New Orleans Saints take their flashy passing offense up to dreaded Seattle. We wish them the best of luck with that.

The Seattle Seahawks—the favorites to make the Super Bowl out of the NFC—employ an exasperating defensive game plan: They blitz rarely and drop an army of defenders into pass coverage. And those defenders mug, obstruct and foul opposing receivers on practically every play.

Quietly, the Seahawks have achieved a 13-3 record and home-field advantage throughout the NFC playoffs by exploiting a loophole: NFL referees are reluctant to throw endless flags for pass interference and defensive holding, even if defenses deserve them.

"They look at it and say, 'We may get called for one but not 10,'" said Mike Pereira, a former NFL vice president of officiating who is now a Fox analyst.

League insiders say this divisional-round matchup between the Seahawks and Saints, the NFC's top passing offense, may be Seattle's rule-bending masterpiece.

"They just seem to not care about the rules," said New York Giants wide receiver Louis Murphy, whose team was routed 23-0 by Seattle this season.

Click to expand...

El Caliente":338y60dv said:

onanygivensunday":338y60dv said:

What I find somewhat hilarious is the mindset on the Saints board that if Browner succeeds in Seattle it's because our defensive backs are allowed to hold on every play and no other team in the league gets such preferential treatment from the refs.

Such crybabies over there.

Click to expand...

A good bit of that theory has to do with this article

Seattle's Defense Relies On a Brazen Tactic: Rampant Interference

On Saturday, the New Orleans Saints take their flashy passing offense up to dreaded Seattle. We wish them the best of luck with that.

The Seattle Seahawks—the favorites to make the Super Bowl out of the NFC—employ an exasperating defensive game plan: They blitz rarely and drop an army of defenders into pass coverage. And those defenders mug, obstruct and foul opposing receivers on practically every play.

Quietly, the Seahawks have achieved a 13-3 record and home-field advantage throughout the NFC playoffs by exploiting a loophole: NFL referees are reluctant to throw endless flags for pass interference and defensive holding, even if defenses deserve them.

"They look at it and say, 'We may get called for one but not 10,'" said Mike Pereira, a former NFL vice president of officiating who is now a Fox analyst.

League insiders say this divisional-round matchup between the Seahawks and Saints, the NFC's top passing offense, may be Seattle's rule-bending masterpiece.

"They just seem to not care about the rules," said New York Giants wide receiver Louis Murphy, whose team was routed 23-0 by Seattle this season.

Click to expand...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240 ... 0005285822

Click to expand...

El Caliente":2wx1cqfs said:

onanygivensunday":2wx1cqfs said:

What I find somewhat hilarious is the mindset on the Saints board that if Browner succeeds in Seattle it's because our defensive backs are allowed to hold on every play and no other team in the league gets such preferential treatment from the refs.

Such crybabies over there.

Click to expand...

A good bit of that theory has to do with this article

Seattle's Defense Relies On a Brazen Tactic: Rampant Interference

On Saturday, the New Orleans Saints take their flashy passing offense up to dreaded Seattle. We wish them the best of luck with that.

The Seattle Seahawks—the favorites to make the Super Bowl out of the NFC—employ an exasperating defensive game plan: They blitz rarely and drop an army of defenders into pass coverage. And those defenders mug, obstruct and foul opposing receivers on practically every play.

Quietly, the Seahawks have achieved a 13-3 record and home-field advantage throughout the NFC playoffs by exploiting a loophole: NFL referees are reluctant to throw endless flags for pass interference and defensive holding, even if defenses deserve them.

"They look at it and say, 'We may get called for one but not 10,'" said Mike Pereira, a former NFL vice president of officiating who is now a Fox analyst.

League insiders say this divisional-round matchup between the Seahawks and Saints, the NFC's top passing offense, may be Seattle's rule-bending masterpiece.

"They just seem to not care about the rules," said New York Giants wide receiver Louis Murphy, whose team was routed 23-0 by Seattle this season.

Click to expand...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240 ... 0005285822

Click to expand...

El Caliente":2mu5o6pd said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

mikeak":19wpw4x8 said:

Browner will have made about 58% of his total career earnings from the one year in New Orleans....

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seah ... -earnings/

Click to expand...

Largent80":1v7owl7a said:

El Caliente":1v7owl7a said:

As a Saints fan, i'm not mad. He was coaxed into making a stupid comment by a troll. He has also said favorable things about his time here in New Orleans, so who cares. He is gone now. I wonder if he has anything left in his tank to be honest with you. There were times last year where he must have been injured, and our injuries must have been too much to let him sit, because he was performing like somebody who had just walked onto the field from the stands.

Ruminator, fear not, we don't hold anything against you guys. Nobody down here remembers the Seahawks beating us in the playoffs, we are better off without Jimmy, and Browner was a dud.

Click to expand...

You will get to see us (even me in person) this year. Duds and all..... :lol:

Click to expand...