Which is important the defense or Russell Wilson leader.

BuZzB28

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I want to know the question. Which is very important the defense leader or Russell Wilson Leader. If Russell Wilson can wins game without for Avril, Wagner, Wright, Kam and Sherman? Or if Wilson cant help because defense can carry him wins games?
 

kobebryant

New member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
2,511
Reaction score
1
Leadership is always more than one man.

Offensively, the unit is pretty young, so you're looking at guys like Wilson, Baldwin and Graham to lead the way there.

Defense is a little more veteran laden with a leadership group of the likes of Bennett, Avril. Wagner, Wright, Sherman, Thomas and Chancellor.

It can be big personalities like Baldwin, Bennett, Sherman and Thomas or strong lead by example types like Chancellor and Wright.

The beautiful thing about football is that no one man is ever going to win a football game by himself.
 

OkieHawk

New member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
6,207
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma City
BuZzB28":we507hpd said:
I want to know the question. Which is very important the defense leader or Russell Wilson Leader. If Russell Wilson can wins game without for Avril, Wagner, Wright, Kam and Sherman? Or if Wilson cant help because defense can carry him wins games?

For me, this is a toss up right now. There are times when the offense isn't clicking for whatever reason, and the D steps it up. Conversely, the defense has laid an egg at times and Wilson has put the game on his shoulders and we've won.
 

Ozzy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,289
Reaction score
3,816
I can see an argument for either side but I truly think the players follow RW's leadership. I'm sure he can drive them a little nuts at times or maybe he doesn't connect with all of them but watching him in the Carolina game changed my perception a little. He is so confident in his ability to come back and plays as hard as he possibly can on every single play even if they are down 30 at the half. Watching his teammates watch him and respond to his effort and message was pretty cool. I think they view him as their leader and they are much more confident in their ability to win games because of him. You can be down 21 in the 4th and I bet every single player on that team feels like RW is going to find a way to win this game.
 

LymonHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
11,324
Reaction score
753
Location
Skagit County, WA
IMHO: Defense is always more important than Offense. Why? Because the D can score points when on the field, whereas the O can't rush the passer.

I'm not a big fan of is this or that better, this is a team game, Offense, Defense, Special Teams.

I believe the old line is: O puts people in the seats, D puts you in the SB, and STs win the SB.
 

Year of The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
245
Location
Idaho
IMHO I dont think anyone on that team would ever answer a question like this. IT IS A TEAM GAME. Neither side could do it without the other. We don't win a super bowl (or another) without either piece. I am just very glade we have the wealth of riches of talent on this team.
That said I feel our offense will take that next step BECAUSE no beast mode. Russell is now the undeniable solo king of the offensive locker room. We saw flashes of it late last year. Because ML was so good and such a strong personality I felt there was a dual leadership in the locker room. Not that ML was doing anything negative to the team intentionally. With him gone Russell can now be the sole leader.
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,102
Reaction score
205
BuZzB28":1ofzx9sq said:
I want to know the question. Which is very important the defense leader or Russell Wilson Leader. If Russell Wilson can wins game without for Avril, Wagner, Wright, Kam and Sherman? Or if Wilson cant help because defense can carry him wins games?
Tough call because there are points with both arguments. From my perspective, nothing really came alive until we finally got a good QB. We had an incredible defense in 2011. Then Russell came along and the rest is history. He is a MAJOR factor but so is the defense. I still feel that if we had even 1/3 of the D that we have had for the last 4 seasons we would have never lost our first SB. It really is hard to call. I think we can all agree that TJack would have never taken us to the promised land though.
 

Anthony!

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
4,050
Reaction score
0
Location
Kent, wa
first it is a ridiculous question. Last I checked you need both. Yes the defense can score, but the offense still has to do something even if it is just eat up the clock, not make mistakes etc. Yes the offense can outscore the other team when the defense cant stop them see Pit game last year. However the defense can still help with better field position, getting off the field quick etc. Now as to leadership-in that case its Wilson as his leadership more than anyone else's transcends offense or defense. Look no further than the SB and what Cam did or rather did not do. Compare that to similar situations you have seen Wilson do in those same situations. Wilson supreme confidence that they can always come back and win. Sherman, ET, Kam, and pretty much all the defense has said his proven ability and confidence makes them not get down, and not loose hope, they expect to come back every time and that is mostly because of Wilson
 
OP
OP
B

BuZzB28

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Do you remembered? Kam was holding for moneys when he missed 2 or 3 games when Seattle's defense got mess up and two loss games. Right? I think, the defense is best and carry to Wilson for win game. They are a great defense. But Wilson is very good game because he know how fast to beat a clock and last mins that won game. He is good leader his team and speak to defense must active and emotional. Lol
 

fenderbender123

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
12,305
Reaction score
2,489
BuZzB28":1bylgzgt said:
Do you remembered? Kam was holding for moneys when he missed 2 or 3 games when Seattle's defense got mess up and two loss games. Right? I think, the defense is best and carry to Wilson for win game. They are a great defense. But Wilson is very good game because he know how fast to beat a clock and last mins that won game. He is good leader his team and speak to defense must active and emotional. Lol

Great post. I couldn't have said it any better myself.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,477
Reaction score
845
Location
Kansas City, MO
Is it bad that I don't understand a word this fool says here or at the Webzone? I'm thinking he's a non-English speaker. I need help seriously.
 

McGruff

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,260
Reaction score
0
Location
Elma, WA
MizzouHawkGal":mxik6j16 said:
Is it bad that I don't understand a word this fool says here or at the Webzone? I'm thinking he's a non-English speaker. I need help seriously.

I pmed him about this but haven't received a response.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,178
Reaction score
1,782
BuZzB28":3fkfsk9d said:
I want to know the question. Which is very important the defense leader or Russell Wilson Leader. If Russell Wilson can wins game without for Avril, Wagner, Wright, Kam and Sherman? Or if Wilson cant help because defense can carry him wins games?

Possible Translation?

I'd like to know the answer to these questions.

Which is most important, is it the league-leading defense, or is it the leadership of Russell Wilson?

Can Russell Wilson win games without Avril, Wagner, Wright, Kam, and Sherman?

Does the defense carry Wilson, and thus lets him win because of their work without the need for his significant contribution?

Otherwise, I'm afraid the OP writer has written gibberish, or should refrain from posting while intoxicated.


Ans:

1. Both are critically important to winning, defense wins Championships, though.

2. Possibly, but doubtful.

3. Possibly, but doubtful
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,823
Reaction score
1,791
MizzouHawkGal":3djb35c9 said:
Is it bad that I don't understand a word this fool says here or at the Webzone? I'm thinking he's a non-English speaker. I need help seriously.
Even though his English is kind of busted up, I kind of get the gist of what he's asking.
Lots of folks are convinced that it's the Defense that carries the Offense to Championships, but bottom line? it's a symbiosis Teamwork gig, and BOTH O & D are of equal importance.
If the Quarterback is inept, or careless with the ball, the Defense can and does get worn out, & vice-versa, the Defense has injuries, you need the Quarterback to pick up the slack.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,477
Reaction score
845
Location
Kansas City, MO
scutterhawk":1qmuiw6r said:
MizzouHawkGal":1qmuiw6r said:
Is it bad that I don't understand a word this fool says here or at the Webzone? I'm thinking he's a non-English speaker. I need help seriously.
Even though his English is kind of busted up, I kind of get the gist of what he's asking.
Lots of folks are convinced that it's the Defense that carries the Offense to Championships, but bottom line? it's a symbiosis Teamwork gig, and BOTH O & D are of equal importance.
If the Quarterback is inept, or careless with the ball, the Defense can and does get worn out, & vice-versa, the Defense has injuries, you need the Quarterback to pick up the slack.
Thanks scutter and I agree with your assessment.
 

Russ Willstrong

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
0
MizzouHawkGal":i0rc0hzu said:
Is it bad that I don't understand a word this fool says here or at the Webzone? I'm thinking he's a non-English speaker. I need help seriously.
Nope.. IMO not an ESL poster but a webzone troll.
How can someone with broken English spell so well, understand English responses perfectly, use complex grammar at times and know how to post the same topic on opposing fan boards.
 
Top