hawknation2016":1k0iwwho said:Bad blocker! Do you hear that 31 other GMs! BAD. BLOCKER.
:2thumbs:
hawknation2016":207flyw8 said:Bad blocker! Do you hear that 31 other GMs! BAD. BLOCKER.
:2thumbs:
kearly":zzy9jq8b said:Stupid choice, stupid reasoning. Can you imagine if they tried banking on this reasoning with Thomas Rawls last year?
But hey, sometimes bad choices have lucky results. I'm rooting for a lucky result.
NewJerseyHawk":75q7qmlb said:Pope is going to clear waivers and make the practice squad.....Collins would not....it's not a matter of production or performance.
I would rather have Burley over Simon, frankly that's the decision we should be focusing on.
Same thing they saw in C. Williams?PlinytheCenter":27xqlz5m said:NewJerseyHawk":27xqlz5m said:Pope is going to clear waivers and make the practice squad.....Collins would not....it's not a matter of production or performance.
I would rather have Burley over Simon, frankly that's the decision we should be focusing on.
Totally agree; what the hell do they see in Tharold?? Sigh...in PCJS we trust.
Milehighhawk":2wppdnww said:Pope brings nothing different that our other backs already have. Collins has the potential to bring other tools but not seen yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chris98251":2aclzhn2 said:Milehighhawk":2aclzhn2 said:Pope brings nothing different that our other backs already have. Collins has the potential to bring other tools but not seen yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Respectfully completely disagree, Pope has the quick cut and burst lacking from all the other backs, Rawls has great cuts but not the burst Pope has, Pope can return kicks, Pope has decent hands or he would not be asked to return kicks, he runs with more leg drive then Collins and or Prosise has shown, Pope reacts and makes his read faster then Michael and gets yards after getting thru the line much better and has shown he can take it to the house once he does so.