seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
I apologize as its probably been posted. I just havent paid attention.
Playing this week?
Playing this week?
Graham
- Thread starter seahawksny
- Start date
nIdahoSeahawk
Member
Pete said yesterday they're taking it day to day and will make a final decision Friday. He said Graham is working hard to get back and is doing fantastic, but they just want to make sure he's good to go. Typical PC answer, I'm betting come Friday they'll either say he's out or that he's a game time decision.
Overseasfan
New member
Maybe week 2 but not yet against the Dolphins.
seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
nIdahoSeahawk":uzlmwicg said:
Pete Always optimistic, even when not realistic. To me, that means not this week. I could be wrong though
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,892
- Reaction score
- 405
Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.
MontanaHawk05":33ajc4qj said:
Playing him this week and giving him a week off next week might not be a bad idea. Let the body get used to things a little bit and keep him away from the Rams, yet keep the Rams guessing.
Oh, and no, I don't actually expect that to happen.
Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
MontanaHawk05":1fx9quti said:
Makes sense, because "we can beat the Rams with our hands tied behind our backs." Besides, "these games don't count like the end of the year games."
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,892
- Reaction score
- 405
Seymour":2doz5fx2 said:
That and out-of-conference games aren't weighted as heavily when it comes to the end-of-season tiebreakers.
Sports Hernia
Well-known member
If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.
Largent80
New member
My guess is he won't play.
HawkerD
Active member
How do you put him off the 53???? IR? Cut? That all I can think of? Maybe you mean off the 45 active roster?kf3339":13f4vxcd said:
dogorama
New member
Seymour":1a1rbtpy said:
Excellent
Basis4day
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 5,924
- Reaction score
- 0
Sports Hernia":1mbzc4ug said:
Too late for that. At had he been on PUP to start the year he would have sat 6 games, healthy or not.
But only 46 players can be active on gameday, so someone on the active roster has to sit regardless.
King Dog
Well-known member
The Rams are sorry bishes that drafted a qb with the number one pick that won't even be active for the opener. If Graham is ready to go - play him.
StaffAmerica74
New member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 861
- Reaction score
- 0
Petes comments remind me of the Percy Harvin days of 2013.
HawkerD":363laopg said:
No, I'm pretty sure Sports Hernia meant that he should have been on the PUP to start and only taken off if completely ready to practice and play to start the season. Right now there is a very good chance he will sit off the 45 man active roster for one or two games.
That's how I took his posts comment.
seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
King Dog":32jt9lxp said:
Yeah, and Nick Foles is a Hall of Famer.
How many games did we win against them last year??
I really dont understand people overlooking them.
Anyone who thinks that the Rams two games arent tougher or as tough as going to NE, GB, Carolina at home, has really not been paying attention.
gowazzu02
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,911
- Reaction score
- 0
seahawksny":266th8c9 said:
Rams game, early in the season. Oh btw the first game in LA in what 25 years? Frankly im down right concerned
