You must have forgotten the Atlanta game, the one we had a drive going and then stalled it with 3 straight runs for next to nothing.
We cannot run the ball because we do not get decent yardage when we do and because you need those downs to make up for the dropped passes etc.
The larger issue is that we are not adjusting our attack to the weaknesses/strengths of the opponent.
We shouldn't have run much at all vs Atlanta because they are decent vs the run but their pass defense is suspect to missing. We could pass all day on them.
Almost the opposite vs the Cards, we should have been running more because the pass game was barely working at all.
But again, we gave up something with by 'improving' the line to make it better for pass protection. Run blocking and pass protection are totally different skill sets. Pass protection is much harder and from all the OL I have known, more exhausting.
I do not think we are near as effective a run blocking team as we were even last year. But, they did change some of the rules on blocking, so maybe the emphasis on removing certain blocks required us to change up and we are just not as able to punch the holes we did in the past? Would be good to hear from someone that played OL on this issue.
But more importantly, we really have a below average RB group. Michael is average, inconsistently better than average and worse - but while not terrible not really a big threat to consistently wear you down OR hit long runs. So if the opposing defense gambles, the worst they pay for it is maybe a 20 yd run. Collins might get you 2 or 3, maybe. Procise will probably get injured stumbling over a blade of grass on his way to the huddle. So where is this run production supposed to come from?