What was the Seahawks blitz percentage tonight?

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,536
Location
Arizona
Can anybody tell me where to find this stat?

Seems like the Seahawks very rarely blitzed even though it was effective when they did.
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
392
They spied Tyrod. If we blitz he would have killed us running the ball.
 

imnKOgnito

Active member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
0
By my count, not excessive, but one too many. If they play coverage on that third and 21, the game likely hits double 00's with a lot less drama. Hypothetical, sure, but I think I just rush 4 there and make sure they're dealing with a 4th and long.
 

evergreen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
467
How about the time out that let them have another pkay at the end
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
Not enough IMHO. TT had way too much time to throw.
Lane and McCray were downright horrible in coverage.
 

NFSeahawks

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
0
evergreen":1lkpz7ii said:
How about the time out that let them have another pkay at the end

Coaching was absurd to end the game. You don't call timeouts to set up another possession then let it run on the last play, what was the point of timeouts to begin with? Pete does some weird stuff but I'll take it since I'm glad he's usually more aggressive on 4th downs.
 
OP
OP
renofox

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,536
Location
Arizona
NFSeahawks628":cr5x8c93 said:
evergreen":cr5x8c93 said:
How about the time out that let them have another pkay at the end

Coaching was absurd to end the game. You don't call timeouts to set up another possession then let it run on the last play, what was the point of timeouts to begin with? Pete does some weird stuff but I'll take it since I'm glad he's usually more aggressive on 4th downs.

Timeouts were the right call. Even with hindsight, he Bills got no extra plays due to the timeouts, but it did create the possibility of the Seahawks countering a Buffalo score.

It may have also been instrumental in this:

(2:09 - 4th) (Shotgun) L.McCoy up the middle to 50 for -1 yards (D.Moore)

It is possible that, in reaction to PC using timeouts, RR called a crappy play to get to the 2-minute warning instead of calling 2 pass plays in the same amount of time.
 

rjdriver

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
1,643
Location
Utah
renofox":gsly6tve said:
NFSeahawks628":gsly6tve said:
evergreen":gsly6tve said:
How about the time out that let them have another pkay at the end

Coaching was absurd to end the game. You don't call timeouts to set up another possession then let it run on the last play, what was the point of timeouts to begin with? Pete does some weird stuff but I'll take it since I'm glad he's usually more aggressive on 4th downs.

Timeouts were the right call. Even with hindsight, he Bills got no extra plays due to the timeouts, but it did create the possibility of the Seahawks countering a Buffalo score.

It may have also been instrumental in this:

(2:09 - 4th) (Shotgun) L.McCoy up the middle to 50 for -1 yards (D.Moore)

It is possible that, in reaction to PC using timeouts, RR called a crappy play to get to the 2-minute warning instead of calling 2 pass plays in the same amount of time.


I thought the time out near the end of the first half was the mind boggling one (after their first down play). It allowed them to even get into fg range. They may have just taken a knee, thus avoiding the whole fiasco that ensued.
 

stang233

Active member
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
363
Reaction score
43
The t.o. was a perfect call. OUR D was on the fold for 40 min. They neweed some air.
 
Top