How do the Seahawks change the narrative re officiating?

UK_Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
513
It's starting to really annoy me this perception that the Seahawks get lucky calls. Worst of all I think it does play in the minds of officials and the higher ups in the NFL.

It's the non calls for the opposition that really get to me, stuff that if the Seahawks do they get called on it, yet because of a couple of notable decisions we are seen as lucky. The facts do not back this up.

I'm probably not making a huge amount of sense, I'm very tired at work but what I see as frustration as a fan is a potential game changer for the Seahawks and their ambitions moving forward. How can we right this perceived injustice and is it even possible?
 

Followthelegion

Active member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
282
Reaction score
27
I'm not sure in all honesty that the narrative can be changed.

Anyone seeing the ESPN coverage post-game can see that this is the line that they are pushing. Take the Atlanta game, the world cried foul at the DPI not called, yet no outlet reported the head slap on Sherman apart from Sherman himself in interviews!

It goes back to previous games as well, with the "Fail Mary" (this is the one that grates me as that was actually a Tate TD called correctly), and the bat out the endzone play by Wright against Detroit.

Maybe its an easy line to feed to consumers as Seattle have had such a great dominant period of late, people love to hate a winner so this narrative will go down well with the viewing public.

The impact on the officials is the one thing that really does worry me about all of this noise however. You can't help but fear with the game on the line in the playoffs, officials will have one thought on 'can't let the Seahawks get a lucky call here'.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,527
Reaction score
856
Location
Phoenix az
Followthelegion":p8qnj6r5 said:
I'm not sure in all honesty that the narrative can be changed.

Anyone seeing the ESPN coverage post-game can see that this is the line that they are pushing. Take the Atlanta game, the world cried foul at the DPI not called, yet no outlet reported the head slap on Sherman apart from Sherman himself in interviews!

It goes back to previous games as well, with the "Fail Mary" (this is the one that grates me as that was actually a Tate TD called correctly), and the bat out the endzone play by Wright against Detroit.

Maybe its an easy line to feed to consumers as Seattle have had such a great dominant period of late, people love to hate a winner so this narrative will go down well with the viewing public.

The impact on the officials is the one thing that really does worry me about all of this noise however. You can't help but fear with the game on the line in the playoffs, officials will have one thought on 'can't let the Seahawks get a lucky call here'.



This narrative pushed by the media is why New Orleans, the most penalized team in the league, stole a game last week with an 11-2!!!!! penalty discrepancy.

Some crews will always have that in the back of their mind.

Its why our opponents have been the least penalized in the league going on 4 years in a row now.
 

NINEster

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,071
Reaction score
59
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

The whole "play to the whistle and then some" mantra that leads to the Seahawks bending the rules a bit in their favor gets on people's nerves. A lot of grey area stuff like the running into the kicker and some of the blocked kicks in the Cardinals game that gives the offending team a chance to benefit more times than not.

Same with the illegal contact on WRs going back a few years.

A lot of team fanbases complain week to week about calls, but only one has to consistently defend themselves.

In the end, it has not cost the Seahawks any wins so far, so why stop?
 

Reaneypark

Active member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
2,127
Reaction score
23
NINEster":11gziznx said:
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

The whole "play to the whistle and then some" mantra that leads to the Seahawks bending the rules a bit in their favor gets on people's nerves. A lot of grey area stuff like the running into the kicker and some of the blocked kicks in the Cardinals game that gives the offending team a chance to benefit more times than not.

Same with the illegal contact on WRs going back a few years.

A lot of team fanbases complain week to week about calls, but only one has to consistently defend themselves.

In the end, it has not cost the Seahawks any wins so far, so why stop?

Stupid people who don't know the rules get bothered by this stuff. The Hawks just need to embrace being The Heel and keep doing what they do.
 

truehawksfan

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
898
Reaction score
0
no doubt the refs were awful yesterday. but the commentary is just terrible.

gruden constantly brushed off penalties committed by the bills by saying, I hate penalties. let them play.

fine, but that wasn't the narrative when the national media lost their minds when Sherm held JJones' arm in the ATL game. yet no one said a thing when the Bills did the same thing to Jimmy Graham...twice. the reason why Graham made those 1 handed catches in the end zone is because the DB grabbed and held is arm.

Cliff Avril was mugged by the RT so many times I lost count. no calls.

L McCoy, caught the ball around the sideline and set up a first and goal and TD. one problem, he stepped out of bounds on his own and was the first to touch the ball.

so, I don't want to hear about the Hawks getting away with calls.
 

drcool

Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
697
Reaction score
8
Location
Jacksonville, FL
And they can change the narrative by stringing together some dominant wins. When you win by less than a score there will always be questions about a call here or there. When you win by 30 there is nothing to blame on a call one way or the other.
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
I wouldn't worry about the refs being impacted by it. For them to be concerned by this type of narrative would be to also admit they were wrong to begin with.

As for opposing fans... those opinions change week to week. No fan is ever happy with any other team other than their own. Some even feel motivated to come on here and try and speak for all others..
 

12thbrah

New member
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
754
Reaction score
0
The narrative won't change. The Hawks play an aggressive style that toes the line in regards to the rulebook. You live or die with it but I do think the players adjust based on how close the refs are calling it early in the game.
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
They change the narrative by no longer being an elite team. Elite teams will always be hated by everyone who isn't a fan of said elite team. This is what success breeds.
 

Ozzy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,302
Reaction score
3,826
NINEster":3ixnnlpp said:
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

The whole "play to the whistle and then some" mantra that leads to the Seahawks bending the rules a bit in their favor gets on people's nerves. A lot of grey area stuff like the running into the kicker and some of the blocked kicks in the Cardinals game that gives the offending team a chance to benefit more times than not.

Same with the illegal contact on WRs going back a few years.

A lot of team fanbases complain week to week about calls, but only one has to consistently defend themselves.

In the end, it has not cost the Seahawks any wins so far, so why stop?

Have you ever played? Sherman on the knockdown was text book football and something that is coached once the QB leaves the pocket. Do better.
 

Ozzy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,302
Reaction score
3,826
drcool":1ojslnre said:
Reaneypark":1ojslnre said:
NINEster":1ojslnre said:
Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

QB was out of the pocket. At that point you can hit the receivers if you want.

He's wrong but won't admit it. Sad really.
 

Laloosh

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
8,688
Reaction score
0
Location
WA
If it pisses off Niner fans, i hope they dont change a thing.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,118
Reaction score
1,457
Location
Kalispell, MT
NINEster":1imv3mph said:
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

The Bills' WR, Woods, looked right at Jeremy Lane and shoved the ball towards his face. Pretty clear taunting.

There is nothing in the rule books penalizing staring down an opposing player or coach.


NINEster":1imv3mph said:
Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

When you say "people," I assume you are not including yourself.

It was perfectly legal and perfectly timed by Sherman. I can see why stuff like this would bother "people" (average uneducated fans), but in no way should that ignorance be fed into by the media like it is here.
 

irocdave

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
1,481
Reaction score
1
NINEster":pm1bhgvn said:
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

The whole "play to the whistle and then some" mantra that leads to the Seahawks bending the rules a bit in their favor gets on people's nerves. A lot of grey area stuff like the running into the kicker and some of the blocked kicks in the Cardinals game that gives the offending team a chance to benefit more times than not.

Same with the illegal contact on WRs going back a few years.

A lot of team fanbases complain week to week about calls, but only one has to consistently defend themselves.

In the end, it has not cost the Seahawks any wins so far, so why stop?

I saw your post in the Hawks thread in the toiletzone. Why not come out and say the same things in your safe haven rival forum? You know why, most of the idiots that post on your home forum don't know the rules, or just don't give a shit and just want a to vent about the Hawks. From your posts on this site, you don't come across as illogical as your flock you hang with, I bet you know why it was OK for the receiver to get his clock cleaned in the endzone when the QB was obviously outside the pocket. hell, I bet you even know that the refs messed up and didn't blow the whistle on the field goal attempt and Sherman did what in hindsight he should have. I bet you also know that he got his hand on the ball.

You are just a troll, making stupid comments on a rival forum, just so you can run back to your nest of stupidity with results for the fledgling idiots at the toilet zone to digest.

You sir have a pathetic life, I'm surprised your own kind allow you back in the bowl with them after sucking up to Hawk fans.
 
OP
OP
UK_Seahawk

UK_Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
513
Laloosh":3ch70dkl said:
If it pisses off Niner fans, i hope they dont change a thing.

Well there's always that. When it comes to Whiner fans whining about the Seahawks I'm reminded of Good Will Hunting. The bit where Robin Williams says he was upset about what Will had said and then he realises something and falls fast asleep. The fact that Will hasnt really lived etc.

This analogy works for Whiner fans too. When I read whatever guff they are talking I get annoyed for about a second before I realise they suck so badly on and off the field that it's only natural they would be so butthurt.

Go read whatever that douche elgauno on plebzone is posting and then remember how awful the organisation he supports is, it makes you feel really sorry for his (and the others) tragic personas. Poor little mites lashing out at an unfair world.

As for the topic at hand, maybe part of this analogy applies here to, the only thing worse than people talking about you is....
 

Seanhawk

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,819
Reaction score
0
irocdave":ckaip54f said:
NINEster":ckaip54f said:
Why did Sherman not get an unsportsmanlike conduct for staring down Rex Ryan while a first down gesture by the Bills WR did?

Knocking down a WR on the final play of the game, no flag.

Stuff like that bothers people.

The whole "play to the whistle and then some" mantra that leads to the Seahawks bending the rules a bit in their favor gets on people's nerves. A lot of grey area stuff like the running into the kicker and some of the blocked kicks in the Cardinals game that gives the offending team a chance to benefit more times than not.

Same with the illegal contact on WRs going back a few years.

A lot of team fanbases complain week to week about calls, but only one has to consistently defend themselves.

In the end, it has not cost the Seahawks any wins so far, so why stop?

I saw your post in the Hawks thread in the toiletzone. Why not come out and say the same things in your safe haven rival forum? You know why, most of the idiots that post on your home forum don't know the rules, or just don't give a shit and just want a to vent about the Hawks. From your posts on this site, you don't come across as illogical as your flock you hang with, I bet you know why it was OK for the receiver to get his clock cleaned in the endzone when the QB was obviously outside the pocket. hell, I bet you even know that the refs messed up and didn't blow the whistle on the field goal attempt and Sherman did what in hindsight he should have. I bet you also know that he got his hand on the ball.

You are just a troll, making stupid comments on a rival forum, just so you can run back to your nest of stupidity with results for the fledgling idiots at the toilet zone to digest.

You sir have a pathetic life, I'm surprised your own kind allow you back in the bowl with them after sucking up to Hawk fans.

Great post, but you are just giving him/her what they want. The only way to respond to trolls is not to acknowledge them at all.
 

BirdsCommaAngry

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
83
According to Buddhism, we are all the narrative. Thus, the question is: how do we change ourselves?
 

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
Did you see SB 40?....and bad officiating goes WAY back before that game and what has the NFL done?
 

Latest posts

Top