tmobilchawker79
New member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 1,263
- Reaction score
- 0
Seven points allowed. Only td after Earl left. I'm impressed. This was well done.
One heck of a defensive effort!
- Thread starter tmobilchawker79
- Start date
Polk738
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 960
- Reaction score
- 807
With only allowing 7 tonight that should bring the scoring defense ppg down to 15.6--they may actually lead the league again in scoring defense for a 5th straight year....unreal.
hgwellz12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- 2,553
dontbelikethat":3nnup6j9 said:
hgwellz12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- 2,553
Might have only allowed 3 if the 'td' was reviewed. Just sayin'
olyfan63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 5,669
- Reaction score
- 1,707
Any conclusive video on whether Terrell had actually touched Ginn at this point? Knee down means nothing if Ginn wasnot been touched prior to ball crossing goal line.
Without proof of "down by contact" prior to ball crossing goal line, it looked like a legit score.
Without proof of "down by contact" prior to ball crossing goal line, it looked like a legit score.
hgwellz12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- 2,553
olyfan63":357vrj93 said:
If not, that is one hell of a photograph! (from a fellow photographer perspective). BOTH of Terrell hands have to be MERE CENTIMETERS from Ginn by the look of that photo.
HawKnPeppa
New member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 4,733
- Reaction score
- 0
Polk738":30xwakrt said:
Not with Earl out.
That image is one of the reasons why we have "officiating problems."
And it's not becuase the image is conclusive. It's because the existence of a still frame image, captured by an unknown photographer, will cause countless fans, bloggers and small minded media members to highlight the supposed ineptitude of officiating.
Any one watching that play at full speed would have called it a TD. And I have seen a video angle yet the proves conclusively otherwise.
And it's not becuase the image is conclusive. It's because the existence of a still frame image, captured by an unknown photographer, will cause countless fans, bloggers and small minded media members to highlight the supposed ineptitude of officiating.
Any one watching that play at full speed would have called it a TD. And I have seen a video angle yet the proves conclusively otherwise.
Chukarhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2011
- Messages
- 4,029
- Reaction score
- 1,433
wrong, I thought he was down from my view at the 300 level
2_0_6
New member
253hawk":33t27idr said:McGruff":33t27idr said:
Terrell touches his helmet when the ball is at the 1/2 yard line.
I'm not aayijg it is or isnt. In fact I think it's probably not . . . But if I'm a ref on the field watching it full speed, I'm calling a TD.
And on that and other angles I don't think you can conclusively pull together all the elements of possession, touch, knee anglesllnd endzone.
It's kind of like the Sherman face mask. It wasnt, but it sure looked like it.
I just think there are enough obvious issues that harping on one's that are bang bang judgment calls is petty.
Calling it a TD is fine, but all scoring plays are reviewed and the booth blew it on this one, not the refs. It's always better to let a play go for as long as it needs to instead of blowing it dead early. You can take back an entire play, but you can't add to it if the whistle has been blown.
