The Future of the Boom?

Seymour

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
22
If 2 of them stick, make the 53 and play well, I'll take that any draft.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,592
Reaction score
1,600
Location
Roy Wa.
Mistashoesta":1nzkj7ly said:
Version 2.0?

Legion of booom facebook melanie lockhart 630x458

9ivbqt

Maybe it perspective and the depth but look how big version 1 is versus version 2. Pads on make a difference also probably.
 

Grahamhawker

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
378
Location
Graham, WA
It's hard to find effective DBs as big as Browner and Chancellor.

I'm just hoping one or two of the news guys pops big and become a new fixture.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,592
Reaction score
1,600
Location
Roy Wa.
Grahamhawker":1nipiz8f said:
It's hard to find effective DBs as big as Browner and Chancellor.

I'm just hoping one or two of the news guys pops big and become a new fixture.

You do have a point, when we drafted and signed Browner in version one we had our pick because nobody was looking at their skill set, now we are competing for those types with many others.
 

Siouxhawk

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
3,776
Reaction score
0
Version 1.0 doesn't need an update yet, but I hope Version 2.0 takes copious notes from the veterans. Nice finds on the photos mista.
 

Seymour

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
22
chris98251":2zqlwkfj said:
Grahamhawker":2zqlwkfj said:
It's hard to find effective DBs as big as Browner and Chancellor.

I'm just hoping one or two of the news guys pops big and become a new fixture.

You do have a point, when we drafted and signed Browner in version one we had our pick because nobody was looking at their skill set, now we are competing for those types with many others.

Not possible. We did not draft Browner. We signed him out of the CFL in 2011, and Pete & John was one of few taking notice.
 

Ruminator

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,116
Reaction score
903
Location
Central Florida
While I have hopes for all four of those guys, I kind of like the sound of "Tyson" and "Griffin" on a LOB squad in the making.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,592
Reaction score
1,600
Location
Roy Wa.
Seymour":al5rkros said:
chris98251":al5rkros said:
Grahamhawker":al5rkros said:
It's hard to find effective DBs as big as Browner and Chancellor.

I'm just hoping one or two of the news guys pops big and become a new fixture.

You do have a point, when we drafted and signed Browner in version one we had our pick because nobody was looking at their skill set, now we are competing for those types with many others.

Not possible. We did not draft Browner. We signed him out of the CFL in 2011, and Pete & John was one of few taking notice.


I was confusing I did say signed Browner and drafted, should have said drafted three and signed Browner.
 

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,192
Reaction score
416
Will version 2.0 still be called the LOB?

Or is this the wrong place and time to ask such a question, or even hint at the eventuality?
 

Josea16

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
0
Ad Hawk":15rjl4gi said:
Will version 2.0 still be called the LOB?

Or is this the wrong place and time to ask such a question, or even hint at the eventuality?
Currently they seem to be going for the LOS. It seems they focused a bit more on pure speed, instincts and playmakers with good size and great ranginess rather then size as the top priority. It's like they looked for Earl Thomas qualities for every position in the secondary. They had several chances to do the LOB 2.0 easily.
 
Top