ESPN tries to cover for Referees

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,077
Reaction score
1,776
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Why NFL officials are ejecting players who don't actually throw a punch


Lane could be seen shoving his left arm into the chest of Packers receiver Davante Adams, after Adams had grabbed and twisted Lane's face mask, but that was the apparent extent of Lane's aggression.

Not even Adams could remember an actual punch thrown, saying that all he could recall was "a lot of hand fighting going on."


Let's be clear on how the NFL treats punching in its rulebook, the document that all players and coaches use to understand how to navigate the game.

Rule 12, Section 4, Article 1(a) lists throwing a punch or a forearm as among the acts that can trigger the league's multiple-foul automatic-ejection rule. In other words, if a player is penalized twice in a game for throwing a punch or forearm, he is to be automatically ejected.

Lane, Spain and Howard were all ejected after a single penalty, however. Why?

The rules give the referee power to eject in circumstances that are deemed "flagrant." For these purposes, flagrant is defined as a violation of rules that is "extremely objectionable, conspicuous, unnecessary, avoidable or gratuitous."

http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post ... ow-a-punch

What a crock of shit.
 

Foghawk

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
1,326
Reaction score
0
Location
The Desert
What Adams did was much more dangerous to a players health than what Lane did.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,707
Reaction score
10,119
Location
Sammamish, WA
Truth, and it's extremely convenient that they magically didn't see it. Just like they didn't see Graham getting mugged in the end zone.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,231
Reaction score
3,016
Location
Spokane, WA
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical
 
OP
OP
ivotuk

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,077
Reaction score
1,776
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Jerhawk":2cqbymd0 said:
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical

Truth

Remember Fail Mary? Remember the non-call against Sherman covering Julio Jones on a prayer of a throw at the end of the game? Those were travesties!

But this? No big deal. The Referees were just doing their job, covering Rodgers butt.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,231
Reaction score
3,016
Location
Spokane, WA
ivotuk":m33txluy said:
Jerhawk":m33txluy said:
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical

Truth

Remember Fail Mary? Remember the non-call against Sherman covering Julio Jones on a prayer of a throw at the end of the game? Those were travesties!

But this? No big deal. The Referees were just doing their job, covering Rodgers butt.

Exactly. It's so hypocritical, but they know that the Packers have a bigger fanbase that we have, so they have to tone down the narrative. Preserve those ratings.

But next time some controversial call goes our way, you can bet itll be the headline story.
 

RW92

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Jerhawk":25ym1v67 said:
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical


Your right. Remember how for weeks, and I mean weeks last year everyone talked about how could Richard Sherman got away with holding on Julio Jones. It was incessant. Never stopped and that was the last play of the game. There were a pethora of calls and plays we had yesterday that influenced the out come of the game. It will always be the world against us. And forget it if you think the perfect, I never do anything wrong, Packers will get a call against them.
Never happen.

Best thing to do is tuck this one away and bring it out again in January when we face them again in the playoffs. Make no mistake about it. We're just getting started. This isn't over by any stretch.
 

cymatica

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
4,383
Reaction score
3,059
Jerhawk":2aw8ebpa said:
ivotuk":2aw8ebpa said:
Jerhawk":2aw8ebpa said:
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical

Truth

Remember Fail Mary? Remember the non-call against Sherman covering Julio Jones on a prayer of a throw at the end of the game? Those were travesties!

But this? No big deal. The Referees were just doing their job, covering Rodgers butt.

Exactly. It's so hypocritical, but they know that the Packers have a bigger fanbase that we have, so they have to tone down the narrative. Preserve those ratings.

But next time some controversial call goes our way, you can bet itll be the headline story.

The day I lost respect for Rodgers was when I heard his fail mary reaction. Erin you want to call this a travesty?
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
852
Location
Phoenix az
RW92":191czlfi said:
Jerhawk":191czlfi said:
You know if the roles were reversed, this game would've been the main headline for ESPN, NFL Network, and everyone would've been discussing the travesty that occurred.

But since it went against Seattle, nobody cares. Typical


Your right. Remember how for weeks, and I mean weeks last year everyone talked about how could Richard Sherman got away with holding on Julio Jones. It was incessant. Never stopped and that was the last play of the game. There were a pethora of calls and plays we had yesterday that influenced the out come of the game. It will always be the world against us. And forget it if you think the perfect, I never do anything wrong, Packers will get a call against them.
Never happen.

Best thing to do is tuck this one away and bring it out again in January when we face them again in the playoffs. Make no mistake about it. We're just getting started. This isn't over by any stretch.



Many fans on this board are covering for the referees and downplaying the atrocity that went down in Lambeau yesterday.

Not sure why we would be surprised that ESPN is covering for the golden franchise.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,139
Reaction score
1,527
Location
Spokane
Lane was ejected for basically rolling on top of the guy who brought him to the ground with a facemask while Martellus Bennett got a 15 yard penalty for decking KJ late in the game.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
852
Location
Phoenix az
I saw Pete losing his mind after KJ got decked.

The ref was trying to placate him by motioning that Lane had "punched" therefore the difference in penalty.

What a joke.
 
Top