Lets not forget Coleman

chris98251 · Sep 11, 2017

He came in and was thrown into the mix, having Griffin and Coleman both in the game and on their maiden voyage and we really shit down anything of consequence, Coleman was patrolling the underneath and yes they caught some balls but they were wrapped up for minimal gains, Adams and Cobb make their money on RAC and that didn't happen.

WmHBonney · Sep 11, 2017

Yeah, I thought Coleman did a good job.

ivotuk · Sep 11, 2017

Good call. I think we were better without Lane.

QuahHawk · Sep 11, 2017

Silver lining. We found out Griffin can ball, let him start outside, he will only have better games from here on out. We know what we got with Lane and it is not Griffin. Griffin looks back for the ball and has a cool head.

Josea16 · Sep 11, 2017

I think it's fairly obvious we have bookend cornerbacks like Denver does.

adeltaY · Sep 11, 2017

He played great for being in town for a few days and being thrust into action! At the very least it's good to see we have solid depth behind Lane.

RussB · Sep 11, 2017

hes good, i liked him and griffin on the feild with sherman.

Bobblehead · Sep 11, 2017

ivotuk":2t9l1q57 said:
Good call. I think we were better without Lane.

I think Lane handed his bench papers with his NON infraction.. shame.

Lets not forget Coleman

chris98251

Well-known member

WmHBonney

Well-known member

ivotuk

Well-known member

QuahHawk

Well-known member

Josea16

New member

adeltaY

New member

RussB

New member

Bobblehead

Well-known member

Similar threads

Latest posts