Warren Sharp on "Real Hawk Talk"

Really really worth listening to (Warren Sharp interview: 19'-59'):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go8L0Dj6xxE&app=desktop

Excellent interview. It looks like our playcalling early in games on the road isn't lining up with our strengths. Get Russ in rhythm with short passes then let em rip later in the game.

So they are saying what most of us have suspected. Great find, thanks to the OP, for posting that.
Our eyes aren’t lying apparently. Game planning and play calling needs to get better in 1st halves of games.

Is this where we get to say Neener Neener Neener

Sports Hernia":eb8afxeb said:

So they are saying what most of us have suspected. Great find, thanks to the OP, for posting that.
Our eyes aren’t lying apparently. Game planning and play calling needs to get better in 1st halves of games.

Click to expand...

Making assumptions while using incomplete data...By that I mean, many here are ASSUMING that the players with minimal experience on the Offensive Line are savvy enough to execute their assignments without any glitches.....we all Know that that's not how it's been going down.
Play-calls have to be adjusted accordingly.
This isn't excuses, it's facts.
A semi decent Run game would help TREMENDOUSLY in helping to set up the Passing attack, and right now Bevell is forced to keep it simple.
The players on the O-Line seem to be doing a better job but they still have a long ways to go before they're even playing LEAGUE AVERAGE level football.

scutterhawk":3gf3ayqx said:

Sports Hernia":3gf3ayqx said:

So they are saying what most of us have suspected. Great find, thanks to the OP, for posting that.
Our eyes aren’t lying apparently. Game planning and play calling needs to get better in 1st halves of games.

Click to expand...

Making assumptions while using incomplete data...By that I mean, many here are ASSUMING that the players with minimal experience on the Offensive Line are savvy enough to execute their assignments without any glitches.....we all Know that that's not how it's been going down.
Play-calls have to be adjusted accordingly.
This isn't excuses, it's facts.
A semi decent Run game would help TREMENDOUSLY in helping to set up the Passing attack, and right now Bevell is forced to keep it simple.
The players on the O-Line seem to be doing a better job but they still have a long ways to go before they're even playing LEAGUE AVERAGE level football.

Click to expand...

You really are determined to keep the blame limited to one place.

Why is it so hard to accept the idea that calling quick-release plays might discourage blitzes and thus make things easier on the line?

MontanaHawk05":159l7cng said:

scutterhawk":159l7cng said:

Sports Hernia":159l7cng said:

So they are saying what most of us have suspected. Great find, thanks to the OP, for posting that.
Our eyes aren’t lying apparently. Game planning and play calling needs to get better in 1st halves of games.

Click to expand...

Making assumptions while using incomplete data...By that I mean, many here are ASSUMING that the players with minimal experience on the Offensive Line are savvy enough to execute their assignments without any glitches.....we all Know that that's not how it's been going down.
Play-calls have to be adjusted accordingly.
This isn't excuses, it's facts.
A semi decent Run game would help TREMENDOUSLY in helping to set up the Passing attack, and right now Bevell is forced to keep it simple.
The players on the O-Line seem to be doing a better job but they still have a long ways to go before they're even playing LEAGUE AVERAGE level football.

Click to expand...

You really are determined to keep the blame limited to one place.

Why is it so hard to accept the idea that calling quick-release plays might discourage blitzes and thus make things easier on the line?

Click to expand...

Because for the most part, early in ALL the games, the "Quick Release" has been thwarted.
It's a no brainer for the Opponents D Coaches to create mismatches coming out of the gates, they KNOW how to use our inexperience against us....The more they play together, better they get, the wider the playbook opens up.
It's easy for some to sit in a comfort and profess to know what they BELIEVE will undoubtedly work.
There's a correlation between being one of the most inexperienced O-Lines in the League, and our lack of success in the opening drives.
AGAIN, the more continuity playing TOGETHER, the more cohesion, the wider the playbook will open.

scutterhawk":38sikf7t said:

MontanaHawk05":38sikf7t said:

Why is it so hard to accept the idea that calling quick-release plays might discourage blitzes and thus make things easier on the line?

Click to expand...

Because for the most part, early in ALL the games, the "Quick Release" has been thwarted.

Click to expand...

Wat?

They're not even TRYING the quick release in the first half. That's my whole point, and the point of the OP. Their playbook looks entirely different in the first half because they're calling plays that don't cater to the strengths of the offense. They basically just play in limbo.

MontanaHawk05":nbifozn4 said:

scutterhawk":nbifozn4 said:

MontanaHawk05":nbifozn4 said:

Why is it so hard to accept the idea that calling quick-release plays might discourage blitzes and thus make things easier on the line?

Click to expand...

Because for the most part, early in ALL the games, the "Quick Release" has been thwarted.

Click to expand...

Wat?

They're not even TRYING the quick release in the first half. That's my whole point, and the point of the OP. Their playbook looks entirely different in the first half because they're calling plays that don't cater to the strengths of the offense. They basically just play in limbo.

Click to expand...

Oh contrare' they DID try and go with the quick release, only to have Wilson having to throw the ball away because the O-Line didn't even slow down the attackers, and he STILL took a hit for his troubles.
The entire O-Line wound up on their backs.

scutterhawk":324ziy3x said:

MontanaHawk05":324ziy3x said:

scutterhawk":324ziy3x said:

MontanaHawk05":324ziy3x said:

Why is it so hard to accept the idea that calling quick-release plays might discourage blitzes and thus make things easier on the line?

Click to expand...

Because for the most part, early in ALL the games, the "Quick Release" has been thwarted.

Click to expand...

Wat?

They're not even TRYING the quick release in the first half. That's my whole point, and the point of the OP. Their playbook looks entirely different in the first half because they're calling plays that don't cater to the strengths of the offense. They basically just play in limbo.

Click to expand...

Oh contrare' they DID try and go with the quick release, only to have Wilson having to throw the ball away because the O-Line didn't even slow down the attackers, and he STILL took a hit for his troubles.
The entire O-Line wound up on their backs.

Click to expand...

why DO you capitalize random WORDS?

the offense DIDNT try to utilize the quick passing GAME in the first HALF.

mistaowen":3v9vo0li said:

scutterhawk":3v9vo0li said:

MontanaHawk05":3v9vo0li said:

scutterhawk":3v9vo0li said:

Because for the most part, early in ALL the games, the "Quick Release" has been thwarted.

Click to expand...

Wat?

They're not even TRYING the quick release in the first half. That's my whole point, and the point of the OP. Their playbook looks entirely different in the first half because they're calling plays that don't cater to the strengths of the offense. They basically just play in limbo.

Click to expand...

Oh contrare' they DID try and go with the quick release, only to have Wilson having to throw the ball away because the O-Line didn't even slow down the attackers, and he STILL took a hit for his troubles.
The entire O-Line wound up on their backs.

Click to expand...

why DO you capitalize random WORDS?

the offense DIDNT try to utilize the quick passing GAME in the first HALF.

Click to expand...

Fo sho not in THIS game, NO.