Seahawks O line top 10 per this article.

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,239
Reaction score
5,246
Location
Kent, WA
The article is quoting PFF as listing Seahawks in top 10. Take that as you will.

;)
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
People who cite PFF as a reason that the line sucks also need to cite PFF when they say the line is elite. I just know that 4/5th of the line last week was on the team last year and two of them COULD be in their second year as NFL O-Tackles. A broken clock is right twice a day.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,124
Reaction score
1,045
Location
Taipei
Top 10 performance maybe for the week against an awful Giants team. Top 10 for the season? Not even close.

A team 24th in rushing w/ a 3.9 yards per carry that gives up the most pressure and hits on a qb is not top 10-
 

seahawkfreak

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
5,447
Reaction score
0
Location
Aiken , SC
Like what I see from pass protection but I'm not crowning them until the run blocking is more consistent. Also not going to knock them either because there has definitely been improvement each week.
 

KiwiHawk

New member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
1
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of every aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.
 

Josea16

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
0
KiwiHawk":18ltcsg7 said:
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of e 6very aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.
Sanity on .Net? Get out. Now!
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
The Seahawks will not face an elite defensive line again until November 20th. So we will see what they can get done between now and then.
 

Josea16

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
0
sdog1981":bb32y5qc said:
The Seahawks will not face an elite defensive line again until November 20th. So we will see what they can get done between now and then.
I said this schedule is set up for a big run already. 12-4 is the floor but we may need 13-3 or the full monte at 14-2 because the Rams have a good chance of 12-4 because of their schedule and the fact they are actually good this year. Next year and going forward they are serious trouble and the rivalry will be on in full force like before.

Personally I love having a good division rival because it forces us to at least be playoff level as the floor.
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
No offensive line scapegoat? No Kearse? Golly gee willikers, who or what inanimate object will you blame?
 

Scorpion05

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2016
Messages
1,722
Reaction score
10
KiwiHawk":2vqhntoy said:
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of every aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.

I know this is the popular opinion, but the actual numbers show Russell doesn't hold the ball that long in comparison to some of the elite Qbs in the league. Including Brady. The numbers have been highlighted in other threads

Granted, I'm not suggesting Wilson doesn't hold the ball at times, but it's not at anamoly. Whereas other Qbs hold the ball to go to their 2nd, 3rd, or 4th read..Wilson holds it to extend the play. It typically averages out to the same thing, so Russell gets rid of the ball more quickly than people thinks he does
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,669
Reaction score
1,707
seahawkfreak":j6chb2tw said:
Like what I see from pass protection but I'm not crowning them until the run blocking is more consistent. <snip>

You said Crown???!!! You want to crown our O-Line??!! Crown???!!! I SAY CROWN THEIR ASSES, NOW!!
It turns out that Dennis agrees, Top-Ten line, while Jim M. doubts their ability to keep Russell upright, and suggests lowering our standards for evaluating our O-Line performance. Both expressed their opinions in passionate video interviews, below.

DENNIS G ON 2017 SEAHAWK O-LINE:
Here's what Dennis has to say about our O-Line:

[youtube]nAN9ORwsiVA[/youtube]

JIM M. INTERVIEW ON 2017 SEATTLE O-LINE
I called NFL Expert Jim M. to get his opinion on our O-Line, and in the very brief and heated interview, he stated, incredulously, and emphatically, that our O-Line is not Top Ten. Sorry for the poor audio quality on that one guys--a couple words are hard to hear over the background noise, so I've included a transcript of the interview below.

(Jim M. Interview TRANSCRIPT)
"UPRIGHT? DON'T TALK ABOUT UPRIGHT!! YOU KIDDING ME, STAY UPRIGHT??!! With this O-Line, I just hope Russell can survive the play, survive another pass play."

NFL Expert, Jim M. interview on our O-Line here:
https://youtu.be/8N3-x8XjftQ?t=94

I could not get on Brock H's schedule in time to post an interview, but Brock has graciously agreed to post a video of his thoughts in an upcoming chalk talk. In the meantime, he referred me to this photo:
[imghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKlnRJIW4AEd11I.jpg][/img]
 

seahawkfreak

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
5,447
Reaction score
0
Location
Aiken , SC
olyfan63":2fjjpwk3 said:
seahawkfreak":2fjjpwk3 said:
Like what I see from pass protection but I'm not crowning them until the run blocking is more consistent. <snip>

You said Crown???!!! You want to crown our O-Line??!! Crown???!!! I SAY CROWN THEIR ASSES, NOW!!
It turns out that Dennis agrees, Top-Ten line, while Jim M. doubts their ability to keep Russell upright, and suggests lowering our standards for evaluating our O-Line performance. Both expressed their opinions in passionate video interviews, below.

DENNIS G ON 2017 SEAHAWK O-LINE:
Here's what Dennis has to say about our O-Line:

[youtube]nAN9ORwsiVA[/youtube]

JIM M. INTERVIEW ON 2017 SEATTLE O-LINE
I called NFL Expert Jim M. to get his opinion on our O-Line, and in the very brief and heated interview, he stated, incredulously, and emphatically, that our O-Line is not Top Ten. Sorry for the poor audio quality on that one guys--a couple words are hard to hear over the background noise, so I've included a transcript of the interview below.

(Jim M. Interview TRANSCRIPT)
"UPRIGHT? DON'T TALK ABOUT UPRIGHT!! YOU KIDDING ME, STAY UPRIGHT??!! With this O-Line, I just hope Russell can survive the play, survive another pass play."

NFL Expert, Jim M. interview on our O-Line here:
https://youtu.be/8N3-x8XjftQ?t=94

I could not get on Brock H's schedule in time to post an interview, but Brock has graciously agreed to post a video of his thoughts in an upcoming chalk talk. In the meantime, he referred me to this photo:
[imghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKlnRJIW4AEd11I.jpg][/img]

Funny you went off on that specific word,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, It was put there on purpose.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,892
Reaction score
405
Scorpion05":2sbp47jj said:
KiwiHawk":2sbp47jj said:
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of every aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.

I know this is the popular opinion, but the actual numbers show Russell doesn't hold the ball that long in comparison to some of the elite Qbs in the league. Including Brady. The numbers have been highlighted in other threads

Granted, I'm not suggesting Wilson doesn't hold the ball at times, but it's not at anamoly. Whereas other Qbs hold the ball to go to their 2nd, 3rd, or 4th read..Wilson holds it to extend the play. It typically averages out to the same thing, so Russell gets rid of the ball more quickly than people thinks he does

Depends on which half you're talking about.

Last week, his lone sack came from holding onto the ball on 3rd and 10 because he wanted Baldwin and was staring him down. He had McKissic wide open on the right for at least a 6 or 7 yard gain but never looked there.
 

Popeyejones

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
0
Scorpion05":26iesu1c said:
KiwiHawk":26iesu1c said:
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of every aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.

I know this is the popular opinion, but the actual numbers show Russell doesn't hold the ball that long in comparison to some of the elite Qbs in the league. Including Brady. The numbers have been highlighted in other threads

Granted, I'm not suggesting Wilson doesn't hold the ball at times, but it's not at anamoly. Whereas other Qbs hold the ball to go to their 2nd, 3rd, or 4th read..Wilson holds it to extend the play. It typically averages out to the same thing, so Russell gets rid of the ball more quickly than people thinks he does

He has the fourth longest time to throw in the NFL so far this year. Only Watson, Kizer, and Taylor are holding the ball longner than him.
 

Milehighhawk

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Messages
928
Reaction score
23
Popeyejones":1c88ti6b said:
Scorpion05":1c88ti6b said:
KiwiHawk":1c88ti6b said:
Keep in mind that the metric for a successful O-line passing block is 2.5 seconds. Wilson regularly holds the ball longer than that simply because he's Russell Wilson and he can. Often to spectacular effect.

However, it does expose him to more pressures and hits than a QB like Brady who gets rid of the ball on time.

The thing of it is, the thing the OL needs to improve is time playing together. Not a revolving door of every aging vet, not constant long-shots at new players, but just time to gel as a unit. I see people constantly harping on the OL as if players remain static. They don't. They improve and they are impacted by the guys around them.

Even Walter Jones was less effective when Hutchinson left. The best of the best are not immune from the concept of synergy. Jones and Hutch played like they shared a brain - each knew exactly how the other was going to react at all times. Each was awesome in his own right, but together they were next-level good.

Check back in a few games and you'll see the OL is doing better, Wilson has a better feel for how much or little time he has, and the running game is looking better, simply because they have had more consistency.

Or they'll all be injured and our season will be over.

But one of those two things.

I know this is the popular opinion, but the actual numbers show Russell doesn't hold the ball that long in comparison to some of the elite Qbs in the league. Including Brady. The numbers have been highlighted in other threads

Granted, I'm not suggesting Wilson doesn't hold the ball at times, but it's not at anamoly. Whereas other Qbs hold the ball to go to their 2nd, 3rd, or 4th read..Wilson holds it to extend the play. It typically averages out to the same thing, so Russell gets rid of the ball more quickly than people thinks he does

He has the fourth longest time to throw in the NFL so far this year. Only Watson, Kizer, and Taylor are holding the ball longner than him.

Time to throw is a near worthless stat due to the wide range of variables that go into that number. However, if one must insist on using it, average is by far the worst metric data point to utilize. It needs to be viewed as a mean or under a normalization curve to get any small bit of usefulness out if it. One doesn't need to be a math wiz to understand it either, you just have to look at the list of QBs ordered by time to throw to see just how truly useless it is.
 

Crizilla

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 2, 2012
Messages
4,350
Reaction score
654
Location
Kirkland
sdog1981":27qsi246 said:
People who cite PFF as a reason that the line sucks also need to cite PFF when they say the line is elite. I just know that 4/5th of the line last week was on the team last year and two of them COULD be in their second year as NFL O-Tackles. A broken clock is right twice a day.

If it currently has our o line as top 10 that's impressive. Even when we won the Superbowl it was still ranked 26th or something like that
 
Top