2016 vs 2017 oline

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,139
Reaction score
1,528
Location
Spokane
There is no question that the 2016 o line sucked. 2017 wasn't much better. Two guys were part of both lines. Britt and Ifedi. It took Britt until his 3rd year and 3rd position change to finally be worth keeping on the roster. Most fans wanted him gone after each of his first 2 years. Maybe Ifedi will pull it together in his 3rd year at RG.

I think that the o line is in better shape heading into 2018. Brown should stabilize the LT spot and be better after time in the system. Joekel (If resigned) should be healthier and ready to go from the start. Pocic will be better. Could Pocic and Ifedi switch positions and make the the line better as a whole? Can Fant come back healthy and play well at RT?

Joekel is the only one not under contract for next year. Heading into the off-season, it looks like, on paper at least, that the o line is in better shape potentially than it was at this time last year. Most will want Ifedi gone but he's under contract so he will be back.

Other than the obvious Cable must go responses, how does everyone feel about the talent level of the o line?
 

hawknation2017

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
0
LT Duane Brown
LG Jordan Roos
C Justin Britt
RG Germain Ifedi
RT George Fant
ST Ethan Pocic

I think we finally have a group that could be pretty good, at least on paper. I really liked what I saw from Roos. Ifedi is clearly better suited for guard. This line would have a nice combination of experienced veterans (Brown and Britt) and versatile athletes (Roos and Fant). Pocic is probably best at center but should be cross trained at all five positions.
 

Grahamhawker

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
378
Location
Graham, WA
Joekel can find some other team to overpay for him next year. Then he'll probably get fully healthy and make the Probowl.

Big picture- my eyes tell me there is no way the OL should be as bad as it consistently looks. It's been discussed ad nauseum, but there have got to be the worst scheme and communication issues imaginable going on for all 5 positions to look as bad as they often do.
 

getnasty

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
667
LT- Brown
LG-Pocic/draft pick
C-Britt
RG-Ifedi/Pocic
RT-Fant

I hope we go OL early again but even if we don't this looks better but it also means new positions for Fant and Ifedi.
 

seahawkfreak

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
5,447
Reaction score
0
Location
Aiken , SC
Can we imagine a big bad ass LG mauler on the left. I don't know what to do on the right side.
 

hawknation2017

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
0
seahawkfreak":1mnc5vyw said:
Can we imagine a big bad ass LG mauler on the left. I don't know what to do on the right side.

Roooooooooos

roos_jordan_0.png
 

timmat

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
326
Reaction score
0
Too often this season multiple o linemen were blown up on the same play. RBs and QBs struggling to complete a handoff because defenders are actually challenging the exchange. Constant pressure from multiple locations on pass plays. Brown and Britt can stay. Pocic is still a work in progress and a depth piece on a good line. I'd like to see the team bring in some more free agent talent like Brown with the cap space saved with Graham gone, Kam and Cliff maybe retiring, etc. The "draft and develop" theory isn't working. I don't want to see Russell's prime wasted as we fiddle around with a sub standard line. Brown at LT, Fant at RT, Britt C, and two solid journeymen free agents to fill in the guard positions. Current young guys as depth / injury replacements. Coupled with a TE that can actually be physical and block. Russ should not be expected to go through another season absorbing this level of pounding. If we had a QB with avg NFL mobility, we'd have set a record for sacks allowed.
 

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,535
Location
Arizona
As long as Cabevell is here, significant OL improvement will not happen.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,903
Reaction score
1,082
The real issue is that we roll the dice bringing guys from other positions to play OL, then put them in the ZBS - which is one of the more difficult systems to learn correctly.

Finally, after years of struggle - some of them finally get it...right about the time we let them walk.

If we had bothered to keep some of our guys we do not have this problem.

The second problem is the belief that attitude/meaness is somehow a valuable OL trait that we will take at the expense of skill. There is a belief this skill/ability can be learned later - but that just wastes time and it rarely works for us. We need lineman than play the damned position we draft, not former UPS delivery guys that are 'mean and nasty'

Our entire approach to the OL is stupid, does not work and wastes draft capital. And every year we go all in, believing THIS time it will work....whatever.
 

hawknation2017

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
0
I was sounding the alarm bells for the last couple years about the tackle position and the center position before Britt.

But next year, it looks like they have potentially five good pieces who seem to fit together. Though, I'm not sure how much faith we should put in George Fant returning from injury to learn a new position or Jordan Roos (though I really like what I have seen from "Creature Man" in limited action).
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
renofox":1azxqbp0 said:
As long as Cabevell is here, significant OL improvement will not happen.
Pretty much. They don't have talent issues on the OL it is coaching pure and simple. Everything Cable touches turns to crap, don't shake his hand.
 

massari

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
318
The free agent market for OL's looks pretty thin. Wonder if someone like La'el Collins might be available? Was lurking on a Cowboys forum and it seems he's like their Germain Ifedi without the penalties. Still young with upside but has a $6.5M average cap hit the next two seasons. Can play LG and RT.

LT Brown
LG Collins / Roos
C Britt / Pocic
RG Ifedi
RT Fant
 

hawk45

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
10,009
Reaction score
16
We have Brown and Britt instead of just Britt so it'll have to be better but we will still be scratching our heads at the poor start next year.

And there is zero hard evidence cable can draft and mold a tackle. Fant was awful last year and will be coming off injury.

Again we will have new players at 3 positions if we move Ifedi although I abs support moving Ifedi.

Every single year we talk about how the line will be better and every year it isn't. So no, I'm still not buying. Brown is the only real difference and he's a year older and in cable's system a year. So he will be worse.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
hawknation2017":3tkrcwct said:
LT Duane Brown
LG Jordan Roos
C Justin Britt
RG Germain Ifedi
RT George Fant
ST Ethan Pocic

I think we finally have a group that could be pretty good, at least on paper. I really liked what I saw from Roos. Ifedi is clearly better suited for guard. This line would have a nice combination of experienced veterans (Brown and Britt) and versatile athletes (Roos and Fant). Pocic is probably best at center but should be cross trained at all five positions.

Dude, wipe your ass with this paper, it's what any team with a semi competent D Line will do.
 

Seymour

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
22
mrt144":38dmox6d said:
hawknation2017":38dmox6d said:
LT Duane Brown
LG Jordan Roos
C Justin Britt
RG Germain Ifedi
RT George Fant
ST Ethan Pocic

I think we finally have a group that could be pretty good, at least on paper. I really liked what I saw from Roos. Ifedi is clearly better suited for guard. This line would have a nice combination of experienced veterans (Brown and Britt) and versatile athletes (Roos and Fant). Pocic is probably best at center but should be cross trained at all five positions.

Dude, wipe your ass with this paper, it's what any team with a semi competent D Line will do.

LOL, I agree. Glad I don't suffer from reading all that garbage.

Not surprising at all, and spoken like a true Tom Cable disciple.
 

getnasty

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
667
What has Jordan Roos done to get anyone excited about him? Dude couldn't even get a start on the team with a horrible OL and several injuries throughout the year. Not saying he might not be good just not counting on it.
 

CodeWarrior

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
1,769
Reaction score
0
This question is like arguing over which pile of shit stinks the least.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
getnasty":94a3w0h1 said:
What has Jordan Roos done to get anyone excited about him? Dude couldn't even get a start on the team with a horrible OL and several injuries throughout the year. Not saying he might not be good just not counting on it.

He's a body under team control, no more no less.
 

hawknation2017

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
0
Roos looked very good to me on Sunday. Good power and moves extremely well for his size. He would be our 3rd highest graded offensive lineman (behind Brown and Britt) if he had played enough snaps.

Why didn't he play enough snaps? The team was committed to not going "too young" on the offensive line. This was basically a redshirt year for Roos.

But it is a small sample size and athleticism does not always translate in the longterm, so we will see. I would think Pocic would have the edge over Roos going into training camp. Roos would have to beat someone out.
 

ducks41468

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
632
Reaction score
0
The line actually looks decent on paper. Under a different OL coach and new scheme, I think they could be a league average line with no changes. Under Cable, however, they will continue to be a bottom 5 line regardless of talent and continuity.
 
Top