Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Aros' Fearless Prediction Thread - (Seahawks @ Rams)

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
  • I am not sure too many expect a win this Sunday. If we are without Carson I would say pretty much forget it. Due to recent injuries the momentum has stalled a bit. Then again perhaps they play inspired after a flat offensive performance at home against the Chargers. At the end of the day the better team will once again prevail.


    Aros' Fearless Prediction: Seahawks 24 - Rams 35

    Aros' Fearless Record: 7-1
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 13289
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 4 miles from Richard Sherman!


  • No Carson and Fluker: 27-13 Rams
    With Carson and Fluker 31-28 Rams
    2_0_6
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2907
    Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:40 pm
    Location: South Seattle


  • My prediction record is tanked for the year, so what the hell.

    Seahawks 31
    Rams 30
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 16589
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


  • They snookered all of you after losing a NON Conference game and roll into L.A. with the spirit and magnificent of my MIGHTY Seahawks and crush the whinny little Lambs.

    Seahawks 34
    Lambs 16
    Chawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2216
    Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:18 am
    Location: corner of 40th & plum


  • I have a feeling the good Wilson shows up this week.
    Unfortunately it isnt enough.
    Hawks 24 - Rams 34
    iigakusei
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1591
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:14 am


  • Lets hope everyone is healthy.. 31-24 Seahawks :mrgreen:

    YTD: 4-4
    doso
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 59
    Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:34 pm


  • Unlike last game where Kupp and Cooks both exited early this one will be a laugher by the 3rd quarter. Two teams trending in an entirely different direction. Wilson does his usual thing moving the ball late in the game against Prevent. Rams 31-14.
    RCATES
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 489
    Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:09 am


  • The Rams are going for blood after their loss to the Saints. This isn't going to be pretty.

    Rams 34
    Hawks 13
    kf3339
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2740
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm


  • Rams - 42
    Hawks - 20
    pittpnthrs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1181
    Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 10:19 am


  • I am hoping for an overconfident Rams team.

    28-24 Hawks
    SeaMeat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1200
    Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:16 pm
    Location: Avondale, Arizona!!!!!!!!!!


  • Seahawks will continue to expose a mediocre Rams defense. 42-38 Seahawks.
    knownone
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1706
    Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:10 pm


  • Seahawks 10 lambs 7
    Sox-n-Hawks
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3073
    Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:26 am


  • "On any Sunday....." the Hawks can win. Only if Russ has a great game do the Hawks win.
    Bigpumpkin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7445
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA USA


  • Rams somewhere between 30 and 40, Seahawks somewhere between 15 and 25.

    With no Carson and esp. with no Flucker we are screwed.
    TreeRon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 502
    Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:48 pm


  • Rams 41

    Hawks 17
    Shanegotyou11
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1932
    Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:08 pm


  • Seattle 23
    Los Angeles 37
    West TX Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2276
    Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:24 am


  • Them 31
    Us 27
    LudwigsDrummer
    US Navy Air VP 56 `74-`78
     
    Posts: 1869
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:44 pm
    Location: Smokey Point


  • 36 27 Rams. Carson is beat up and so is Fluker. Rams will be hungry to get back in the win column at home. This offence changes drastically when Carson is not in there.

    Ytd: 8-0
    Cyrus12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6529
    Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:20 am
    Location: BC Canada


  • 37-13 Rams

    Hope I'm wrong.

    Losing Earl was just huge man.... Backside of our D is almost useless against these guys.
    Last edited by BlueThunder on Sun Nov 11, 2018 12:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
    BlueThunder
    *Net Enemy Forum Guy*
     
    Posts: 3652
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:39 am
    Location: Arlington, Washington


  • Rams would virtually clinch the NFC West with win. 4 game lead +tiebreaker = 5 game lead with only 6 to play.

    Rams 35 Seahawks 13
    cjcinec56
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:59 am


  • I'm thinking this game is not going to be close,.....Rams 38 Hawks 20
    Hamhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2130
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:05 pm
    Location: Kenmore WA


  • i have a lot of doubt after the garbage we put up last sunday.

    Rams 60, Seahawks O

    i dont care what my record is obviously. I care about the hawks record.

    Add to that ...if the hawks future rests on an overweight oft injured right guard..... gasp
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3594
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


  • It’s a division game. Hawks and Rams always play each other hard no matter what else matters in our football world.

    I do think the Rams win. But no way in hell is this an easy game.

    For either team.

    I’m sure there will be lots of drinking and pacing. Well, by me.
    RedAlice
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3323
    Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:47 am
    Location: San Diego


  • Rams 27-20, Hawks keep it close throughout. That being said, if we don't see Mcdougald and Carson, we lose by 10-14. And the worship of the Rams continues :roll:
    But, Erin and company will be in for a rude awaking next Thursday night.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11853
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • If we do not have Carson, McDougald, or Fluker it's a loss.

    Seahawks 20
    Rams 27

    My Record to Date: 6-2
    HawkFan72
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 16453
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
    Location: Antioch, CA


  • Exactly, it's not an excuse when it's legit. This team isn't nearly at their best w/out Fluker and Carson. Let alone Mcdougald. It's just the way it is.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11853
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • SoulfishHawk wrote:Exactly, it's not an excuse when it's legit. This team isn't nearly at their best w/out Fluker and Carson. Let alone Mcdougald. It's just the way it is.


    We are 0-3 without Fluker, and we are also 0-3 when Carson does not get at least 10 carries.

    Let that sink in a bit..... :(
    Seymour
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6413
    Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 4:41 pm


  • I heard that this morning. That's a crazy, but very accurate stat right there. As much as I was worried about Fluker and his health etc. He has been one hell of an addition. And Carson is clearly the best back out there, they look like a completely different team w/out those two guys in there.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11853
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • Seahawks 10
    Rams 34

    ytd: 7-1
    Seahawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 132
    Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:57 am


  • I am a homer type fan & always expect my team to win even when 10 point underdogs. Any given Sunday type of thing.
    So, I'm expecting a high scoring game with multiple comebacks from both teams. IF, the defense is up to the task, and the offense executes & performs up to their capabilities there is no reason this game is unwinnable. With a high scoring game and the lead changing hands multiple times, the Seahawks just need to execute & have a good game plan (for once) and they very well could win this game in the 4-th quarter (as they have done many times in past games).

    I like to expect the unexpected so my projected final score--------------------------> Seahawks 42, Rams 38.
    (and a highly entertaining game, especially for Seahawks fans.)
    See also: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl- ... ss?src=rss

    :smilingalien:
    CamanoIslandJQ
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1448
    Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am
    Location: Camano Island, WA


  • Rams 37
    Seahawks 24

    Season Record To Date: 6-2
    DYLcurry59
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 672
    Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:27 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


  • Seahawks 4
    Rams 7
    endzorn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2676
    Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:14 pm


  • No Carson, David’s starts... but Penny shows us his explosiveness and has 108 yards on 15 carries with 2 TDs with his coming out party! Seahawks win by 4.

    Seahawks - 37
    Rams - 33


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    AKNFidel
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 90
    Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:49 am
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • Mr. glass, Penny and Davis to rescue! 28-24 Hawks.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    toffee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1492
    Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:44 pm


  • Seahawks 24
    Rams 40

    RTD: 6-2
    Steve2222
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1977
    Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:12 am


  • Seahawks win. They may have a rough season ahead of them, but they will be held as “contenders” for the rest of the season becacuse they were one of the teams who beat the Rams.

    Seahawks 27
    Rams 24
    Mistashoesta
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1625
    Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:22 am


  • Mistashoesta wrote:Seahawks win. They may have a rough season ahead of them, but they will be held as “contenders” for the rest of the season becacuse they were one of the teams who beat the Rams.

    Seahawks 27
    Rams 24


    If you are right I will buy you your choice of drink next time you are in town. :lol:
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 13289
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 4 miles from Richard Sherman!


  • Mistashoesta wrote:Seahawks win. They may have a rough season ahead of them, but they will be held as “contenders” for the rest of the season becacuse they were one of the teams who beat the Rams.

    Seahawks 27
    Rams 24


    It’s still funny to me that now beating the Rams is a “thing.”

    :179417:
    RedAlice
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3323
    Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:47 am
    Location: San Diego


  • This is probably the toughest one of the year for me to try and predict. The Rams are hot, and playing solid ball on all sides, offense, defense, and special teams.with all that said, I still predict that we’re going to kick their asses this weekend, not by much, probably by a little.

    I look to see our defense shut down Girley, shut down their run game, and force them to the air, where we should be able to capitalize, by forcing them into making a lotta mistakes.
    That should allow us the turnovers and sacks that we need to put ourselves out and ahead of them before the end of the game.

    I’ll look for the Rams to come out strong early, and try to set Seahawks behind, but most likely it’s going to go the other way where we’re going to take an early lead, and then just slow the whole game down by running the ball, converting on 3rd downs, stretching the clock out as we go along.

    That was the formula we shared with the rest of the NFL the last time we played the Rams, and the same one the Saints just borrowed from us to end the Rams winning streak last weekend. It looks like McKissick isn’t gonna play this game, we could sure as hell use him in this one though.

    Chris Carson will kill himself for the Hawks and the 12. If he is good to go, and more importantly if he doesn’t have to take to the bench half way thru the game again. Davis and Penny can all contribute, there is nothing the Rams can do to stop us from running them into the ground ?

    If we can succeed in our running the ball, even when they know we’re going to run it, and discover that can’t stop us, Is the precise moment the outcome off this game will be decided. They’ll know it and do will we.

    Seahawks 28 - Rams 21 Seahawks go 5-4 and Rams go 8-2 in this one.

    Go Seahawks! Super Bowl Bound.
    pacific101
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 355
    Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:49 pm
    Location: Florence, Oregon


  • My Rookie is going to get after it and Norton nails down the defensive game plan.

    13-7 hawks


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sox-n-Hawks
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3073
    Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:26 am


  • I've been wrong more than right, so let's continue that.

    Rams 34
    Hawks 17

    YTD 3-5
    Zeearend
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 100
    Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:20 am
    Location: 3 meters below sea level


  • Rams secondary has holes. For whatever reason Marcus Peters has been horrible. But Aaron Donald usually makes an impact in these kind of games. Rams offense is one of the best. Jared Goff is playing at a higher level than last season, which was a pretty good season too. Todd Gurley is Todd Gurley. Rams have too many weapons to contend with as long as they don't get knocked out of the game. Over/under should be in excess of 50. Maybe even 60.

    Seahawks should put up points against a weak secondary. But their offense is not Saints like so it may not be enough.

    Rams 38
    Hawks 28
    snackdaddy
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 47
    Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:15 pm


  • I think it will be closer than 10 points which is the spread. As well it will be a low scoring game. Talking to a few smart bettors here in Vegas tell me. They dislike betting on Seattle b/c the team is unpredictable.

    Seattle is tough in those low scoring contests, there is always a chance at the end of the game. I’m hoping for an upset.
    jammerhawk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 5809
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:13 pm


  • I'm hoping for an upset win.

    I do think it'll be a lower scoring game by the Rams based on our defense's ability to adjust. I also think it'll be lower scoring for us based on Carson's limited playing time or not at all.
    BleuEyedHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 154
    Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:05 am




It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:03 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information