I can't believe Russell Wilson signed to play for Pete

quadsas · Jan 12, 2020

He would end up being greatest quarterback of all time playing for a coach who doesn't intentionally handcuff him.

Rat · Jan 12, 2020

I think it's more inept than intentionally.

Cyrus12 · Jan 12, 2020

A lot of teams or coaches might not have even given RW a chance.

TheLegendOfBoom · Jan 12, 2020

Cyrus12":2gyagohb said:
A lot of teams or coaches might not have even given RW a chance.

Andy Reid wanted to draft Wilson and called Carroll to let him know after.

NFSeahawks · Jan 12, 2020

quadsas":1dvw1wmx said:
He would end up being greatest quarterback of all time playing for a coach who doesn't intentionally handcuff him.

I think tonight I fully accepted in my heart that Russ carries this team to victories, despite Pete. He’s not flawless but he is elite.

northseahawk · Jan 12, 2020

RW 1st, 2nd, and .5 of 3rd quarter = complete shit!

RW 4th and behind by 3 tds = plays out of his mind to make up for his shitty play the previous 3 qrtrs!

John63 · Jan 12, 2020

NFSeahawks628":10wmpa9v said:
quadsas":10wmpa9v said:

He would end up being greatest quarterback of all time playing for a coach who doesn't intentionally handcuff him.

Click to expand...

I think tonight I fully accepted in my heart that Russ carries this team to victories, despite Pete. He’s not flawless but he is elite.

Bingo we have a winner. What's interesting is no player is flawless even those in the HOF.

John63 · Jan 12, 2020

northseahawk":26gq02kh said:
RW 1st, 2nd, and .5 of 3rd quarter = complete $h!t!

RW 4th and behind by 3 tds = plays out of his mind to make up for his $h!t play the previous 3 qrtrs!

Lol yeah not the way it went. If you watched you would notice a change in play calling, and tempo. That only happened because we were down. For example only 12 pass attempts in the first half. We had a 3 and out all runs. Other than the FG and last drive of the half no drive had more passes than runs, with 3 drive ending oline penalties.

mikeak · Jan 12, 2020

:irishdrinkers:

northseahawk":215gjafw said:
RW 1st, 2nd, and .5 of 3rd quarter = complete $h!t!

RW 4th and behind by 3 tds = plays out of his mind to make up for his $h!t play the previous 3 qrtrs!

Yeah that three and out running up the middle really sucked by RW....

Playcalling and gameplan was crap. Reminded me of Panthers and Dallas playoff games

WestcoastSteve · Jan 12, 2020

We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

John63 · Jan 13, 2020

WestcoastSteve":2zr2rbks said:
We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

It is not just about taking the ball out, it is about the plays called and tempo. Lining up for 2rd and ling and sending everyone 20 yards is not a good play call. Not providing a check down is also not good.

We had 8 runs in the first half including a 3 straight run 3 and out.

Some dont understand it is not just about attempts it is about the plays and tempo. For example 2and half the tempo they played at changed, the patterns changed.

Another example you have peyton manning, but all you call is roll outs but you do it 20 times. Well gi en manning sucks at roll outs you wasted the plays and basically took him out of the game. That's what we did and do in the first half. We allow the defense to get set. Give little time pre snap to adjust due to always getting the plays in late. But in the 2nd half when we get behind we change the tempo, we change the play calls. We run a system this team and our QB is best at.

We are saying use the system we used in the 2and half. That we use at the end of every game, the system which always moves the ball.

quadsas · Jan 13, 2020

NFSeahawks628":3qjou6dd said:
quadsas":3qjou6dd said:

He would end up being greatest quarterback of all time playing for a coach who doesn't intentionally handcuff him.

Click to expand...

I think tonight I fully accepted in my heart that Russ carries this team to victories, despite Pete. He’s not flawless but he is elite.

He is not flawless as no player is, but tonight when he was allowed to shine he was, honestly, just unbelievable. As in I couldn't believe we actually have THIS guy as our quarterback and we lost two playoff games in 2 years because he wasn't given an opportunity to play football for the whole game

OrangeGravy · Jan 13, 2020

John63":yn1lnbix said:
WestcoastSteve":yn1lnbix said:

We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

Click to expand...

It is not just about taking the ball out, it is about the plays called and tempo. Lining up for 2rd and ling and sending everyone 20 yards is not a good play call. Not providing a check down is also not good.

We had 8 runs in the first half including a 3 straight run 3 and out.

Some dont understand it is not just about attempts it is about the plays and tempo. For example 2and half the tempo they played at changed, the patterns changed.

Another example you have peyton manning, but all you call is roll outs but you do it 20 times. Well gi en manning sucks at roll outs you wasted the plays and basically took him out of the game. That's what we did and do in the first half. We allow the defense to get set. Give little time pre snap to adjust due to always getting the plays in late. But in the 2nd half when we get behind we change the tempo, we change the play calls. We run a system this team and our QB is best at.

We are saying use the system we used in the 2and half. That we use at the end of every game, the system which always moves the ball.

What patterns did we run in 2nd half that we didn't run in the first half? When in the play clock were we snapping the ball in the 1st half vs the 2nd?

John63 · Jan 13, 2020

OrangeGravy":oyoq8v1c said:
John63":oyoq8v1c said:

WestcoastSteve":oyoq8v1c said:

We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

Click to expand...

It is not just about taking the ball out, it is about the plays called and tempo. Lining up for 2rd and ling and sending everyone 20 yards is not a good play call. Not providing a check down is also not good.

We had 8 runs in the first half including a 3 straight run 3 and out.

Some dont understand it is not just about attempts it is about the plays and tempo. For example 2and half the tempo they played at changed, the patterns changed.

Another example you have peyton manning, but all you call is roll outs but you do it 20 times. Well gi en manning sucks at roll outs you wasted the plays and basically took him out of the game. That's what we did and do in the first half. We allow the defense to get set. Give little time pre snap to adjust due to always getting the plays in late. But in the 2nd half when we get behind we change the tempo, we change the play calls. We run a system this team and our QB is best at.

We are saying use the system we used in the 2and half. That we use at the end of every game, the system which always moves the ball.

Click to expand...

What patterns did we run in 2nd half that we didn't run in the first half? When in the play clock were we snapping the ball in the 1st half vs the 2nd?

Okay in the first half we often snapped the ball with under 3 seconds to go. In the second half we snapped it sometimes with 10left, sometimes as soon as we got to the line. Sometimes they went hurry up that gives us the advantage. As to patterns first half few if any check downs. 2nd half almost always a Chech down. First half no pick plays, 2nd half a few picks. I can go on but you should get the idea.

WestcoastSteve · Jan 13, 2020

OrangeGravy":3on9h2bg said:
John63":3on9h2bg said:

WestcoastSteve":3on9h2bg said:

We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

Click to expand...

It is not just about taking the ball out, it is about the plays called and tempo. Lining up for 2rd and ling and sending everyone 20 yards is not a good play call. Not providing a check down is also not good.

We had 8 runs in the first half including a 3 straight run 3 and out.

Some dont understand it is not just about attempts it is about the plays and tempo. For example 2and half the tempo they played at changed, the patterns changed.

Another example you have peyton manning, but all you call is roll outs but you do it 20 times. Well gi en manning sucks at roll outs you wasted the plays and basically took him out of the game. That's what we did and do in the first half. We allow the defense to get set. Give little time pre snap to adjust due to always getting the plays in late. But in the 2nd half when we get behind we change the tempo, we change the play calls. We run a system this team and our QB is best at.

We are saying use the system we used in the 2and half. That we use at the end of every game, the system which always moves the ball.

Click to expand...

What patterns did we run in 2nd half that we didn't run in the first half? When in the play clock were we snapping the ball in the 1st half vs the 2nd?

Exactly -- it's nonsense. The gameplan was to attack the Packers in the air the difference is in the second-half their pass rush slowed down and Russ got deadly accurate.

We didn't change our system in the second-half - it's a cute narrative but the playcalling says otherwise.

rcaido · Jan 13, 2020

So you guys would rather have Wilson play somewhere else?

We had so many key injuries & had very respectable record & so close to beating a very healthy Packers team on the road.

Pete is fine, we just didn't have enough depth. Imagine we had Carson & Penny. Imagine Disley instead of Hollister. Imagine we had Josh Gordon instead of Turner. How about Britt instead of Hunt.

We win if the guys caught the ball or stop them on 3rd down. Its not pretty but we win way more than we lose.

quadsas · Jan 13, 2020

rcaido":10ov6fu1 said:
So you guys would rather have Wilson play somewhere else?

We had so many key injuries & had very respectable record & so close to beating a very healthy Packers team on the road.

Pete is fine, we just didn't have enough depth. Imagine we had Carson & Penny. Imagine Disley instead of Hollister. Imagine we had Josh Gordon instead of Turner. How about Britt instead of Hunt.

We win if the guys caught the ball or stop them on 3rd down. Its not pretty but we win way more than we lose.

We should be winning more

quadsas · Jan 13, 2020

WestcoastSteve":3tf3mca4 said:
OrangeGravy":3tf3mca4 said:

John63":3tf3mca4 said:

WestcoastSteve":3tf3mca4 said:

We had 17 pass plays and only 7 runs in the first-half.

This idea we took the ball out of Russ hand is crap and not based in facts.

Click to expand...

It is not just about taking the ball out, it is about the plays called and tempo. Lining up for 2rd and ling and sending everyone 20 yards is not a good play call. Not providing a check down is also not good.

We had 8 runs in the first half including a 3 straight run 3 and out.

Some dont understand it is not just about attempts it is about the plays and tempo. For example 2and half the tempo they played at changed, the patterns changed.

Another example you have peyton manning, but all you call is roll outs but you do it 20 times. Well gi en manning sucks at roll outs you wasted the plays and basically took him out of the game. That's what we did and do in the first half. We allow the defense to get set. Give little time pre snap to adjust due to always getting the plays in late. But in the 2nd half when we get behind we change the tempo, we change the play calls. We run a system this team and our QB is best at.

We are saying use the system we used in the 2and half. That we use at the end of every game, the system which always moves the ball.

Click to expand...

What patterns did we run in 2nd half that we didn't run in the first half? When in the play clock were we snapping the ball in the 1st half vs the 2nd?

Click to expand...

Exactly -- it's nonsense. The gameplan was to attack the Packers in the air the difference is in the second-half their pass rush slowed down and Russ got deadly accurate.

We didn't change our system in the second-half - it's a cute narrative but the playcalling says otherwise.

If it was one game, sure, I get it. A season, okay, I can take it, but this logic looks sketchy. 8 seasons of same shit tells the whole story.

rcaido · Jan 13, 2020

quadsas":lt4mjx1c said:
rcaido":lt4mjx1c said:

So you guys would rather have Wilson play somewhere else?

We had so many key injuries & had very respectable record & so close to beating a very healthy Packers team on the road.

Pete is fine, we just didn't have enough depth. Imagine we had Carson & Penny. Imagine Disley instead of Hollister. Imagine we had Josh Gordon instead of Turner. How about Britt instead of Hunt.

We win if the guys caught the ball or stop them on 3rd down. Its not pretty but we win way more than we lose.

Click to expand...

We should be winning more

You think a coaching change would do that? Only Belicheat has more wins than Pete since Wilson arrived. Seahawks had the most playoff wins since Pete started for the Seahawks behind the Patriots. I think Pete is winning enough.

quadsas · Jan 13, 2020

rcaido":3rtzr53z said:
quadsas":3rtzr53z said:

rcaido":3rtzr53z said:

So you guys would rather have Wilson play somewhere else?

We had so many key injuries & had very respectable record & so close to beating a very healthy Packers team on the road.

Pete is fine, we just didn't have enough depth. Imagine we had Carson & Penny. Imagine Disley instead of Hollister. Imagine we had Josh Gordon instead of Turner. How about Britt instead of Hunt.

We win if the guys caught the ball or stop them on 3rd down. Its not pretty but we win way more than we lose.

Click to expand...

We should be winning more

Click to expand...

You think a coaching change would do that? Only Belicheat has more wins than Pete since Wilson arrived. Seahawks had the most playoff wins since Pete started for the Seahawks behind the Patriots. I think Pete is winning enough.

We don't know. But what I do know is that Wilson wins despite terrible rosters and piss poor gameday decisions. Brees, Rodgers etc have shown that they can't do it. Only Brady and Wilson have. And you will very rarely hear anyone say that Belichick didn't utilise Brady well.

I can't believe Russell Wilson signed to play for Pete

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Active member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Active member

Well-known member

New member

New member

Well-known member

New member

Similar threads