not letting the highest paid QB in the league take over the game until way late in the game. Same thing with the Dallas playoff game last year. Pete's philosophy only works with a good enough defense. I'm absolutely shocked that the coaching staff screwed this up for the 2nd straight year. If the Seahawks would have played the entire game like they played in the 4th quarter, they would have put up 30+ points. This loss all on the coaching staff. I'm done.
I still can't believe what I just saw
- Thread starter Crizilla
- Start date
FloridaSeahawk18
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 369
- Reaction score
- 384
We'll draft another D End who doesn't see the field like Collier
Polk738
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 960
- Reaction score
- 807
I don't understand how they can be so un-creative in the running game-3 straight hand offs to Lynch up the middle that went no where, no crack toss to Homer on the outside? No screens to Lynch, such boring conservative play calling.
seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
Crizilla":2kmxvd5t said:
Second straight year? happened in Atlanta in 2013, then again in Carolina in 2015. This has happened multiple times already. Last year in Dallas, we never really bounced back in that game. The games i mentioned ring more similar to tonight in my opinion. Insurmountable leads. GIVE THE QB THE ******* BALL TO RUN WITH IT!!
on defense, can they find a way to take 17 out of the game? adams was running free 'most of the time'...
on offense, homer should be involved earlier.
basically though, they need to start winning the 1st half of games. whatever it takes...
on offense, homer should be involved earlier.
basically though, they need to start winning the 1st half of games. whatever it takes...
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,895
- Reaction score
- 411
Pass first fetishist.
To be fair, they tried to let Russ take over the game mid way through the 2nd quarter, and our line just couldn't give him time. It would have been nice if they had a sense of urgency earlier in the game, but I don't think this was in the same stratosphere as that Cowboys game.
Threedee
Well-known member
At least we're no longer drafting them for the O Line. Progress!FloridaSeahawk18":3pswffgy said:
John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
MontanaHawk05":12dhrp4h said:
NO what wins fetish
Threedee
Well-known member
seahawksny":2u8122bv said:
Come to think of it, tonight's game was much more competently coached than the Dallas game was. More progress!!
John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
Mad Dog":2pp2wk0v said:
PC has said they use the first half to see what the defens eis doing.
s to game planning what game plan, lets test the defense and see what they are doing for a half and then say Wilson go win the game. Not much of a plan.
Donn2390
Well-known member
It must suck to be a poor loser.... but you have a lot of company in here, lots of know-it-all armchair QB's who know more than the coaches...Crizilla":1k61qi19 said:
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,895
- Reaction score
- 411
quadsas":36qutkem said:
And what would you do when we abandoned the run entirely and all of a sudden defenses simply shift back entirely into coverage since they don't have to guard the run?
What would you do when pass-first...just yielded the same result?
Or when Russell Wilson throws a pick?
bevellisthedevil
Well-known member
MontanaHawk05":324ngusc said:
No, you don't abandon the run but you would think you could call something other than dives up the middle. You don't think you could throw in a draw, toss, jet sweep, or a screen?
