John63":3rfr6hup said:
kjreid":3rfr6hup said:
Since the Offense cannot "run the first 20" plays that are set to begin the games the only thing that will happen going with a faster offense play scheme is giving the opponent more chance in the first half.
1st it should not take 20 plays to figure out what the defense is doing, that is what film is for.
Absolutely. Teams don't even have defensive coordinators whose job it is to change up the defensive gameplan week-to-week to suit the opponent.
John63":3rfr6hup said:
2. it will be harder for the defense when they can't count on the snap happening with under 5 seconds to go which is as it is now. Moving faster and thus having the snap be at different times helps our oline and the entire offense.
So it's your opinion that Pete decides when the ball is snapped, not Russ? Why then does Russ do the snap count?
John63":3rfr6hup said:
3. we own TOP in the 2nd half which is when we usually speed things up by a far larger margin than in the 1st half when we run the slow motion offense.
We also choose to kick to start the game and receive in the second half, which contributes to a TOP differential. Also, if we have a lead we generally choose to sit on it via the running game rather than extend it via the pass. Just saying.
The idea is to control the time of possession, not to have more time of possession. Run out the clock if we're ahead, or milk the clock if we're behind. Having a balanced offense allows that to happen.