[tweet]https://twitter.com/710ESPNSeattle/status/1294129119102300160[/tweet]
I just can’t stand it when the quarterback has too much time in the pocket – he will almost always find an open receiver, especially at the NFL level.
And the Seahawks’ defensive philosophy hasn’t been working, so why not try something different? They were 26th in total defense last year, terrible against the run and the pass. With Adams and Quinton Dunbar, that should change this year, but what about their defensive principles? Will they change too?
Fair question to ask, particularly with a coaching staff that seems stubborn and set in their ways at times, the evidence being their staunch support of playing so much base defense last year and acting like it was somehow better than if they’d gone to nickel defense more often. Really? Those statistical numbers on NFL.com don’t back up what they contend. Could it have been much worse if they’d gone to nickel more frequently? I’d say no. And there’s a chance the overall numbers could have improved.
I just can’t stand it when the quarterback has too much time in the pocket – he will almost always find an open receiver, especially at the NFL level.
And the Seahawks’ defensive philosophy hasn’t been working, so why not try something different? They were 26th in total defense last year, terrible against the run and the pass. With Adams and Quinton Dunbar, that should change this year, but what about their defensive principles? Will they change too?
Fair question to ask, particularly with a coaching staff that seems stubborn and set in their ways at times, the evidence being their staunch support of playing so much base defense last year and acting like it was somehow better than if they’d gone to nickel defense more often. Really? Those statistical numbers on NFL.com don’t back up what they contend. Could it have been much worse if they’d gone to nickel more frequently? I’d say no. And there’s a chance the overall numbers could have improved.