Do Not Sell My Personal Information

NFL Site Start em Cam Newton at Seattle

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE: PG-13
NFL Site Start em Cam Newton at Seattle
Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:53 pm
  • Start 'em Cam Newton New England Patriots · QB at Seattle Seahawks

    Newton set a Patriots record with 75 rushing yards in his debut. It’s hard to believe 75 yards was a record when past Patriots quarterbacks include Tom Brady, Drew Bledsoe and Steve Grogan, who was probably the last NFL quarterback in history to wear a neck roll.

    Newton also rushed for a pair of touchdowns and ended up with 25.7 fantasy points despite throwing for just 155 yards.

    And I know you haters want to besmirch him because he didn’t throw the ball that much. But that’s fine. Cam has the Seahawks this week, who just allowed Matt Ryan to throw for 450 yards and a pair of touchdowns.


    https://www.nfl.com/news/start-em-sit-e ... arterbacks



    And of course that means that the Seahawks can't defend the pass? :34853_doh:
    ivotuk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 20447
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • Yeah, that's sounds like a winner. You do you, though. :laugh:
    sutz
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 20130
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:41 am
    Location: Kent, WA


  • Edelman > Julio

    These guys are a joke. How does one get these jobs?
    Jerhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3174
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA


  • Matt Ryan is a better passer than Cammy, he has a top 3 WR, he had no running game, and threw for over 200 yards in the 4th quarter after his team was already down by 19 points and the Hawks were in prevent.

    #$%&ing morons.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6825
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17450
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:10 am


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.


    Here's the thing, though: I don't expect this game to play anything like the Atlanta game. None of Pete's games against Belicheat have been decided by more than a TD. I don't expect us to be in a prevent defense in the 4th.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6825
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Maulbert, none of those previous games were played against the new and de-proved Patriot squad. The Pats went downhill last year, but since last year they have really taken a dive in terms of overall roster. Yes they still have some good players, but the support isn't there like it used to be, If this is a tight game Belichek will have worked a miracle.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1284
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


  • “We’re not playing the Panthers this week.” ~ my stupid ass at first
    Rat
    * NET Cynic *
     
    Posts: 6013
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm
    Location: Grand Rapids, MI


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.



    LOL I chuckled. You're spot on. Fantasy football isn't real life. Generally you like your fantasy QB to be on a team that spends a lot of time coming from behind or has no defense and has to have shoot outs.
    gowazzu02
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1765
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:32 am


  • Did they actually say Edelman is better than Julio Jones? If so, that might be one of the dumbest statements a media member has ever said.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15761
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • Maulbert wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.


    Here's the thing, though: I don't expect this game to play anything like the Atlanta game. None of Pete's games against Belicheat have been decided by more than a TD. I don't expect us to be in a prevent defense in the 4th.


    Over/under for the game is 44, that's not high, but it's not in the 30's either.

    So again, a fantasy site saying to start Cam because he's probably going to throw for a couple TD's and run for 50 yards is not an insane thing to predict.

    Week 12 or 13 when Cam's hamstring is close to exploding? Yeah, I wouldn't start him, but week two when everyone's healthy and offenses are a little ahead of the defenses? Sure, not bad advice.

    Not sure why we have to take everything said about us as a direct insult. OMG A FANTASY SITE SAID TO START CAM,......TO THE DISRESPECT-MOBILE BATMAN!!!
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17450
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:10 am


  • Meh, Fantasy doesn't matter even a little bit. If he comes in here and wins, I'll give him plenty of credit.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15761
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • They have Superman

    Sent from my IN2017 using Tapatalk
    toffee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2299
    Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:44 pm


  • Nah, the Hawks do.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15761
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.


    Here's the thing, though: I don't expect this game to play anything like the Atlanta game. None of Pete's games against Belicheat have been decided by more than a TD. I don't expect us to be in a prevent defense in the 4th.


    Over/under for the game is 44, that's not high, but it's not in the 30's either.

    So again, a fantasy site saying to start Cam because he's probably going to throw for a couple TD's and run for 50 yards is not an insane thing to predict.

    Week 12 or 13 when Cam's hamstring is close to exploding? Yeah, I wouldn't start him, but week two when everyone's healthy and offenses are a little ahead of the defenses? Sure, not bad advice.

    Not sure why we have to take everything said about us as a direct insult. OMG A FANTASY SITE SAID TO START CAM,......TO THE DISRESPECT-MOBILE BATMAN!!!




    Bahahhahaha

    Don't let the OP see that another site said to SIT Carson.
    gowazzu02
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1765
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:32 am


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.


    Here's the thing, though: I don't expect this game to play anything like the Atlanta game. None of Pete's games against Belicheat have been decided by more than a TD. I don't expect us to be in a prevent defense in the 4th.


    Over/under for the game is 44, that's not high, but it's not in the 30's either.

    So again, a fantasy site saying to start Cam because he's probably going to throw for a couple TD's and run for 50 yards is not an insane thing to predict.

    Week 12 or 13 when Cam's hamstring is close to exploding? Yeah, I wouldn't start him, but week two when everyone's healthy and offenses are a little ahead of the defenses? Sure, not bad advice.

    Not sure why we have to take everything said about us as a direct insult. OMG A FANTASY SITE SAID TO START CAM,......TO THE DISRESPECT-MOBILE BATMAN!!!

    How many fantasy points did Matt Ryan have last week? Over 400 yards passing and a few TDs, it was probably quite a few.
    Rat
    * NET Cynic *
     
    Posts: 6013
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm
    Location: Grand Rapids, MI


  • But his team lost, so there is that. 8)
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15761
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • I’ve never been in a league where you lose points for that.
    Rat
    * NET Cynic *
     
    Posts: 6013
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm
    Location: Grand Rapids, MI


  • SoulfishHawk wrote:Did they actually say Edelman is better than Julio Jones? If so, that might be one of the dumbest statements a media member has ever said.


    No lol I was attempting to be funny. I'm just thinking how they think Cam going to throw for a bunch of yards and TDs with a lousy receiving corps
    Jerhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3174
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA


  • Rat wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:Do you guys even fantasy bro.

    Fantasy football is backwards logic, if you think the Hawks are going to win and be ahead most of the game (which we are favored to do), then you do want to start Cam, who like Ryan will be playing from behind and have to throw and run more than if he was protecting a lead.

    So no, it's not a slap in the face that fantasy sites are telling people to start Cam, just means what I said above.


    Here's the thing, though: I don't expect this game to play anything like the Atlanta game. None of Pete's games against Belicheat have been decided by more than a TD. I don't expect us to be in a prevent defense in the 4th.


    Over/under for the game is 44, that's not high, but it's not in the 30's either.

    So again, a fantasy site saying to start Cam because he's probably going to throw for a couple TD's and run for 50 yards is not an insane thing to predict.

    Week 12 or 13 when Cam's hamstring is close to exploding? Yeah, I wouldn't start him, but week two when everyone's healthy and offenses are a little ahead of the defenses? Sure, not bad advice.

    Not sure why we have to take everything said about us as a direct insult. OMG A FANTASY SITE SAID TO START CAM,......TO THE DISRESPECT-MOBILE BATMAN!!!

    How many fantasy points did Matt Ryan have last week? Over 400 yards passing and a few TDs, it was probably quite a few.



    Ryan was the #6 most productive fantasy QB last week, and the Hawks gave up the most passing yards in the entire league, 432.

    So if you were telling people who to start this week, you think you might advise Cam who also can get you points running?
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17450
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:10 am


  • We will shut him down. Book it!
    jamescasey1124
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 118
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 12:36 am


  • In every fantasy football league, rushing yards are worth more than passing yards. So the fact that Cam can still run boosts his value, even if he doesn’t throw for 400 yards against us.
    Erebus
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1537
    Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:53 pm
    Location: San Antonio, TX




It is currently Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:29 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ SEATTLE SEAHAWKS FOOTBALL ]




Information
  • Who is online