Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » NET NATION COMMUNITY CENTER » [ THE ARCHIVES ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:28 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1451
Vick does suck - how many years in this league and he still can't read defenses....Yes he has tremendous mobility, yes he has a cannon for an arm but if you cannot read defenses you hit your ceiling pretty quickly. I am one of the few that said that Vick would be a huge NFL success when he came out of W. Virginia. Most people said the mobility wouldn't work in the NFL but I had seen that arm of his sling it downfield and knew he could throw. I didn't know he was lazy

RW played as a rookie - I expect reading defenses to get better, I expect coordinators to start calling smarter plays - like many of us has said that includes slants, screens and dump-offs to RB's. Look at the rinkity-dink football that SD did on Monday basically "long handoffs" that forces the D to stay honest

RW will be fine


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:30 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 1841
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
cboom wrote:
Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Kelly Stouffer started 16 games for the Seahawks, and played in another 6 for a total of 22.

In those games completed 51.5 percent of his passes.
He threw for 7 touchdowns.
He threw 19 interceptions.
He fumbled the ball 20 times.
His CAREER quarterback ranking was 54.5.
He threw for 2333 yards (even if you remove his six non-started games that would only be an average of 146 yards/game).

These facts here make your statement about Wilson the most ridiculous thing I can ever remember reading on this board.


IMO, Stan Gelbaugh was worse than Stouffer.

1-8 in Games as a starter for Seattle
48% completion rating
7- TDs
12 INTs
Overall QB rating 54.1


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:31 am 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 316
Before this thread got blown up in the beginning I think the original post does go a long way to proving a point that there are lot of people on this board with RW glasses on that think the receivers let RW down, when in fact there was not a single real drop in the game, just a bunch of poorly placed balls.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:31 am 
* Dirty Harry *
* Dirty Harry *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
Posts: 3680
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Holy crap balls, Batman!

If this is how this place looks after one loss, just imagine how insane it will be after the second.

Crymany!

My take is this:
Wilson didn't make the best choices out there on Sunday, and the outcome of the game cannot firmly be placed on his shoulders alone. There were more than enough shortcomings to go around over 1/3 of the squad. Thankfully, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.

_________________
"God bless America, and God bless the Seattle Seahawks" - Cortez Kennedy


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:32 am 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3554
HoustonHawk82 wrote:
Thankfully, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.


Nope. Worst performance ever.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:35 am 
* NET Philistine *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10477
Location: Portland, OR
mikeak wrote:
Vick does suck - how many years in this league and he still can't read defenses....Yes he has tremendous mobility, yes he has a cannon for an arm but if you cannot read defenses you hit your ceiling pretty quickly. I am one of the few that said that Vick would be a huge NFL success when he came out of W. Virginia. Most people said the mobility wouldn't work in the NFL but I had seen that arm of his sling it downfield and knew he could throw. I didn't know he was lazy


I can't tell what my favorite part of this paragraph is:

The air of knowledge about Michael Vick followed by getting his college wrong (Hint: Virginia Tech)

or

The claim you were one of the few people to say Michael Vick would be a huge NFL success when he was a #1 overall pick.

_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:37 am 
* Dirty Harry *
* Dirty Harry *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
Posts: 3680
Location: Magnolia, Texas
HawksFTW wrote:
HoustonHawk82 wrote:
Thankfully, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.


Nope. Worst performance ever.


So, just so I'm clear...

one interception is as worse as it could have got?

_________________
"God bless America, and God bless the Seattle Seahawks" - Cortez Kennedy


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:42 am 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3554
HoustonHawk82 wrote:
HawksFTW wrote:
HoustonHawk82 wrote:
Thankfully, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.


Nope. Worst performance ever.


So, just so I'm clear...

one interception is as worse as it could have got?


That was sarcasm.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:49 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7443
cboom wrote:
Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.

Bombastic bullshit. Must still be tell the truth Monday.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:53 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 5519
cboom wrote:
Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.

Thanks for checking in Millen. :roll:

_________________
Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:59 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 5519
cboom wrote:
Chukarhawk wrote:
Troll Clean up aisle 3!!

Clearly Football is not your game Cboof.


Football is not my game because I'm not jumping on the bandwagon of believing a short QB will lead this team to the promise land? A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail.

Your hero Millen is CBJ (Whitehurst) without the cool beard.

_________________
Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:03 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6177
Location: Renton Wa.
Wow and nobody has even brought up Steakboy Sean Salisbury yet.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:11 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:35 pm
Posts: 884
HoustonHawk82 wrote:
Holy crap balls, Batman!

If this is how this place looks after one loss, just imagine how insane it will be after the second.

Crymany!

My take is this:
Wilson didn't make the best choices out there on Sunday, and the outcome of the game cannot firmly be placed on his shoulders alone. There were more than enough shortcomings to go around over 1/3 of the squad. Thankfully, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.


I have a feeling we saw our worst offensive game of this season last Sunday. Wilson showed improvement during the game and I think the coaches got woken up a bit. We may score less points in other games this season but I think the offense will look better.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:12 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 891
cboom wrote:
Chukarhawk wrote:
Troll Clean up aisle 3!!

Clearly Football is not your game Cboof.


Football is not my game because I'm not jumping on the bandwagon of believing a short QB will lead this team to the promise land? A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail.


For a game you admittedly don't know, you sure are dogmatic.

6 centuries ago you would have been the guy saying "I know without a doubt the world is flat", despite people much more informed than you and smarter than you telling you otherwise.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:16 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1451
Sarlacc83 wrote:
mikeak wrote:
Vick does suck - how many years in this league and he still can't read defenses....Yes he has tremendous mobility, yes he has a cannon for an arm but if you cannot read defenses you hit your ceiling pretty quickly. I am one of the few that said that Vick would be a huge NFL success when he came out of W. Virginia. Most people said the mobility wouldn't work in the NFL but I had seen that arm of his sling it downfield and knew he could throw. I didn't know he was lazy


I can't tell what my favorite part of this paragraph is:

The air of knowledge about Michael Vick followed by getting his college wrong (Hint: Virginia Tech)

or

The claim you were one of the few people to say Michael Vick would be a huge NFL success when he was a #1 overall pick.



LOL yeah getting the college wrong was pretty bad. I was so stuck on his awesome performance against West Virgina where he single handedly won the game and made me a believer. Yes VT my bad sorry Vick and Beamer

Yes he was the number one pick but many experts didn't expect him to work. Many non-experts (ie people on these forums) did not expect him to work. Just like the comments about Cam Newton he was the number one pick are you telling me there weren't a TON of doubters out there? I was one of them and it sure felt like I was in the majority and turned out that I was wrong


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:31 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:38 am
Posts: 187
Location: Issaquah, WA
cboom wrote:
Sando was spot on. In fact throughout the game the receivers made some great catches on bad throws. Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


What a spectacular wheelbarrow full of crap. I can only presume you didn't see Jackson or CBJ - last season. Much less the murderer's row of "NFL arms" this team has rolled out over the last thirty years. If Wilson never gets better than last Sunday he still won't crack the bottom-five for this franchise.

Makes for an entertaining thread, though.

_________________
SeaChase wrote:
One thing I noticed,well in my opinion,is that Wilson isnt a good passer.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am
Posts: 818
Location: Camano Island, WA
Last I checked, NFL football is a TEAM game, one weak link brings the whole team down. The Seahawks just had too many weak links in this game. I think Wilson played fairly well for a rookie starter, to put the loss on his back is ignoring ALL of the other negatives of this game. Starting with the coaches play calling, the ineffective & penalty ridden OL and the lack of having more decent receivers. Sure, Wilson made some mistakes (while he was being chased around by an aggressive defense) and I'm sure he'll learn from those mistakes and perform more up to this boards expectations. The QB is just the easiest and laziest way to blame a poor game performance by the whole TEAM.

_________________
<--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:40 pm 
* NET Cynic *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3492
Location: St. Louis, MO
amill87 wrote:
Worst QB may be a bit of an exaggeration but I said in another post he was the QB on one of the worst offensive performances I've seen. Without the turnovers and long returns, we get shut out. He had a bad day which is unusual from him.

He's played in one game. We don't know what's usual for him yet.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:44 pm 
* NET Draft Guru *
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pm
Posts: 3515
Location: Bellingham, WA
I agree with Sando. I didn't see any honest-to-god drops. I saw a lot of passes that the WR had a chance to catch, but that's different from an accurate pass that was dropped.

_________________
Sarlacc, on comparing .NET to Soccer: And why not? It's a bunch of people running around in circles, feigning pain, and never scoring.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seattle had no drops (Sando)
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:51 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am
Posts: 2512
Location: Naples, FL
The worst QB'ing I have seen in a long time was the year Mora jr. was coaching especially Seneca vs the Colts.

_________________
Wolf grey all day every day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Board index » NET NATION COMMUNITY CENTER » [ THE ARCHIVES ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.