 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:28 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
|
After hearing the news that Rice is now in a walking boot because of a foot injury, it makes me wonder why we let Edwards go.
The talent gap between Rice and Charly Martin is Grand Canyon-esque. Not sure why Pete and John decided to release Edwards when they knew Rice had a chronic foot problem (along with his history of being hurt). We saw last year how limited our passing game is when Rice isn't in the game.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:30 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am Posts: 504
|
|
Because Braylon has a hamstring issue that they felt would keep him out at least 3 games.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ParisPC07
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:31 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:14 pm Posts: 388 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
|
I hope not. His few catches seemed to come in clutch moments, but they were still few.
I heard he was hurt again. I could be mistaken.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Killa Kam
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:33 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm Posts: 416
|
|
meh its not like Braylon is reliable anyways, healthy or injured.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:34 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am Posts: 653
|
|
The guy did nothing, not worried about it at all. Beast Mode and Russell and the option plays they were doing vs. Chicago, we'll be golden.
_________________ 60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:34 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6581 Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
Pete said he didn't think (and the team didn't think) Braylon would recover from his hamstring injury before the season ended. After Edward's season last year with the 9ers the Seahawks probably told him he had to stay healthy. Look at the last second, mysterious injury before the Lions game. Was surprised with his release, just as well as the Winslow release but not sure how bad these guys legs were.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Because Braylon has a hamstring issue that they felt would keep him out at least 3 games. Then why would the Jets sign him? Not saying Edwards was playing great, but he did have a TD catch (and almost a 2nd one in Chicago)........and is more dangerous than Martin. Just a little confusing is all if Rice's foot problem was known prior to the release.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:42 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2074 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
baldwin... te's need to play huge, backs need to catch the ball.... has it been confirmed rice is out this sunday?
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:43 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
hawker84 wrote: . has it been confirmed rice is out this sunday? No, he's listed as questionable right now.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am Posts: 661
|
|
Who?
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:52 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm Posts: 1430
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Because Braylon has a hamstring issue that they felt would keep him out at least 3 games. Then why would the Jets sign him? Not saying Edwards was playing great, but he did have a TD catch (and almost a 2nd one in Chicago)........and is more dangerous than Martin. Just a little confusing is all if Rice's foot problem was known prior to the release. I agree with this. An inactive Braylon Edwards is still more dangerous than a healthy Charley Martin.
_________________ I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Aerik
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:55 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 37
|
SoulfishHawk wrote: The guy did nothing, not worried about it at all. Beast Mode and Russell and the option plays they were doing vs. Chicago, we'll be golden. I see what you did there
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BocciHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm Posts: 556
|
|
If Braylon Edwards is the answer, I don't like the question.
I think some of the reason he was released is that they were going to have to churn the roster somewhat because of the CB suspensions. Folks seem to forget that when you've got a guy suspended, or two guys suspended, it can really mess with the roster... you don't want to release healthy guys or guys that you know you need later, on the off chance that another team tries to pick them up and take advantage.
I don't think PC or JS thought anyone would want a dinged up Braylon Edwards for a few weeks. I'm kind of surprised the Jets took a flyer on him given his comments on Twitter.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hoxrox
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:29 pm Posts: 743
|
|
To me, he looked slow on his routes, and didn't do a good job using his height to his advantage.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6169 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Because Braylon has a hamstring issue that they felt would keep him out at least 3 games. Then why would the Jets sign him? Not saying Edwards was playing great, but he did have a TD catch (and almost a 2nd one in Chicago)........and is more dangerous than Martin. Just a little confusing is all if Rice's foot problem was known prior to the release. The Jets may have signed him because they know they're tied to Sanchez at QB, and they have zero WRs who have any chemistry or connection with him. Edwards did at one point, and they may be trying to recapture that (in other words, they're thinking longer-term than just the last 3 weeks of the season).
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:02 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm Posts: 1430
|
BocciHawk wrote: If Braylon Edwards is the answer, I don't like the question.
I think some of the reason he was released is that they were going to have to churn the roster somewhat because of the CB suspensions. Folks seem to forget that when you've got a guy suspended, or two guys suspended, it can really mess with the roster... you don't want to release healthy guys or guys that you know you need later, on the off chance that another team tries to pick them up and take advantage.
I don't think PC or JS thought anyone would want a dinged up Braylon Edwards for a few weeks. I'm kind of surprised the Jets took a flyer on him given his comments on Twitter. Suspended players do not count against the active roster. Braylon was released because he presented no value to the team for the remainder of the year.
_________________ I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:10 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
volsunghawk wrote: The Jets may have signed him because they know they're tied to Sanchez at QB, and they have zero WRs who have any chemistry or connection with him. Edwards did at one point, and they may be trying to recapture that (in other words, they're thinking longer-term than just the last 3 weeks of the season).
Makes sense. Just seems like a gamble on Pete's part, especially if he has plans on making a run in the playoffs (which he should right?). Cause right now our receiver corp is comprise of; - A hurt Rice - Tate who is just now playing up to his potential - Baldwin who also can't stay healthy this year - Martin (big question mark) - Kearse (fresh off the practice roster) Even if Edwards was indeed going to be on the shelf for 2-3 weeks, that still means he could have added roster depth for the playoffs......ESPECIALLY if one or two of our receivers are hurt/banged up.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:15 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5685 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
volsunghawk wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Because Braylon has a hamstring issue that they felt would keep him out at least 3 games. Then why would the Jets sign him? Not saying Edwards was playing great, but he did have a TD catch (and almost a 2nd one in Chicago)........and is more dangerous than Martin. Just a little confusing is all if Rice's foot problem was known prior to the release. The Jets may have signed him because they know they're tied to Sanchez at QB, and they have zero WRs who have any chemistry or connection with him. Edwards did at one point, and they may be trying to recapture that (in other words, they're thinking longer-term than just the last 3 weeks of the season). Winner winner, chicken dinner!
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:49 am |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm Posts: 3465 Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
|
IMHO...the OP is making a "Mountain out of a molehill"! Pete said in his presser yesterday that Rice has had a sore toe for the season, but when he woke up Monday morning that his entire foot was sore. He had an X-Ray taken as well as an MRI. There was no appearant structural damage. So, the MD's advised him to soak it in Epsom Salts with warm water and limit movement as long as possible.
The medical staff advised Pete the Mr. Edwards's injury to his hamstring muscle would likely limit him severely for the next three weeks. Anyone who has had a sore hamstring realizes very quickly that it limits the speed you can run. Hence, the decision to release Mr. Edwards.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
EastCoastHawksFan
|
Post subject: Re: Did we make a mistake with letting Braylon go? Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:09 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm Posts: 570
|
|
The Jets like headlines , I thought that was obvious.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12evanf, 12thManNorth, AgentDib, AVL, Blitzer88, BlueThunder, bryantology79, cacksman, CHawks4L, chihawk, dbmack, dunceface, Evil_Shenanigans, FlyingGreg, FormerEvil, formido, fridayfrenzy, GCrow, geoff21, Ghough, Giedi, godzillarad, GoldenTater81, Google [Bot], grizbob, gtcotcakya, HansGruber, Hawks46, Kixkahn, legend38, LymonHawk, Mandu, misfit, Missing_Clink, PasteyNuTTeR, PrepntheSep, RockHawk, ryan419_2002, seahawk17, Seahawksfan425, Seahwkgal, SharkHawk, SilNWest, Spleenhawk2.0, tacomahawk, themunn, travlinhawk, twisted_steel2, Veilside, volsunghawk, Wasteland2112, YaktownHawK, Yoonhawk and 205 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|