Seahawks Salary Cap Higher than we Thought

Hawkstorian

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,904
Reaction score
615
Location
Spokane
I've been corresponding with the founder of one of the salary cap sites and apparently there was another adjustment just prior to free agency from the $13.2M figure that's been widely reported. In fact, the Seahawks got another $1M or so adjusted upward so our total cap is $137.2M. I've been posting updates in the stickied thread up top but I thought this was important enough to post by itself.

Seahawks right now have about $6.5M in available space, even after rookies are signed they would have over $6M. Probably enough to sign another mid-level veteran and work out an extension with Chancellor if the parties are willing.
 

TheHawkster

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
1
Location
Puyallup
Thats a little more than I was thinking.
I thought we were about 5.5 to 6 without the rookies.
Thats good news.
 
OP
OP
Hawkstorian

Hawkstorian

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,904
Reaction score
615
Location
Spokane
Tech Worlds":2y2n3k6n said:
Yeh this is about where I had it pegged after doing my calculations.

Yeah, I see you out there on the boat with your laptop pro rating bonuses. Just your style.
 

The Radish

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
18,469
Reaction score
3
Location
Spokane, Wa.
Hawkstorian":1ofo36ba said:
Tech Worlds":1ofo36ba said:
Yeh this is about where I had it pegged after doing my calculations.

Yeah, I see you out there on the boat with your laptop pro rating bonuses. Just your style.


Pegging John, he said pegging.

:les:
 

The Yugoslavian

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
879
Reaction score
0
Location
Bellevue, WA
Great news. My wish list appears realistic then. I really really really want us to;

1.) Sign Fred Davis, 1 year 1.2 mil deal
2.) Re-sign Alan Branch
3.) Sign Charles Woodson to play nickel & 3rd safety
4.) Re-sign Kam "Bam-Bam" Chancellor

We have the space to do all four and still sign the rookies. Let's make it happen!
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
Hawkstorian":2smrju6x said:
I've been corresponding with the founder of one of the salary cap sites and apparently there was another adjustment just prior to free agency from the $13.2M figure that's been widely reported. In fact, the Seahawks got another $1M or so adjusted upward so our total cap is $137.2M. I've been posting updates in the stickied thread up top but I thought this was important enough to post by itself.

Seahawks right now have about $6.5M in available space, even after rookies are signed they would have over $6M. Probably enough to sign another mid-level veteran and work out an extension with Chancellor if the parties are willing.

Thanks for making a separate topic, a lot of us (including me) wouldn't have seen it otherwise.

Am I reading you right on that second paragraph? The Seahawks usually budget $4 million for draft picks (without the late 1st it's probably $3 million now). Granted some picks won't make the 53 man roster but I'd think Seattle would add more than 500k in spending- unless the draft picks only replaced other players on 1st contracts. I'm not saying you're wrong, you might be dead on, I just thought it was an interesting estimate.
 
OP
OP
Hawkstorian

Hawkstorian

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,904
Reaction score
615
Location
Spokane
Only the 1st 51 contracts count against the salary cap in the off-season, so most rookie deals don't fit into the top-51 and the ones that do bump another deal off the top-51. So even after we sign all our draft picks our cap space will only go down by a few hundred thousand.

So our 'rookie pool' will be $4M or so but that doesn't mean we have to reserve an extra $4M of cap space.
 

Tech Worlds

Active member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
11,272
Reaction score
26
Location
Granite Falls, WA
Hawkstorian":16nl0p7o said:
Only the 1st 51 contracts count against the salary cap in the off-season, so most rookie deals don't fit into the top-51 and the ones that do bump another deal off the top-51. So even after we sign all our draft picks our cap space will only go down by a few hundred thousand.

So our 'rookie pool' will be $4M or so but that doesn't mean we have to reserve an extra $4M of cap space.

I will have to agree with John as this is my way understanding it as well.
 

Jazzhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
10,237
Reaction score
72
Tech Worlds":3sdtz6hd said:
Yeh this is about where I had it pegged after doing my calculations.
For some reason I knew you were into pegging.
 

pinksheets

Active member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
3,254
Reaction score
19
Location
Seattle
A London Hawk":1ez62gnu said:
And then all 53 count when the final roster cuts are done?
No, I believe the salary cap numbers are always based on your 51 highest paid players.
 
OP
OP
Hawkstorian

Hawkstorian

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,904
Reaction score
615
Location
Spokane
A London Hawk":1fsirtry said:
And then all 53 count when the final roster cuts are done?

Correct. All 53 plus any injured players and the practice squad.
 

QuahHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
5,641
Reaction score
108
Location
Issaquah, WA
The Yugoslavian":2l2rvc4p said:
Great news. My wish list appears realistic then. I really really really want us to;

1.) Sign Fred Davis, 1 year 1.2 mil deal
2.) Re-sign Alan Branch
3.) Sign Charles Woodson to play nickel & 3rd safety
4.) Re-sign Kam "Bam-Bam" Chancellor

We have the space to do all four and still sign the rookies. Let's make it happen!

Close to my opinion

1. Re-sign Alan Branch
2. Re-sign Kam Chancellor
3. Sign FA CB or DT (Woodson or Seymore)
 

SalishHawkFan

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
0
Tech Worlds":1vud3tgo said:
Yeh this is about where I had it pegged after doing my calculations.
Yeah, when I threw my dart that's where it landed too.
 

HawKnPeppa

New member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
4,733
Reaction score
0
Tech Worlds":6hqvhzll said:
Hawkstorian":6hqvhzll said:
Only the 1st 51 contracts count against the salary cap in the off-season, so most rookie deals don't fit into the top-51 and the ones that do bump another deal off the top-51. So even after we sign all our draft picks our cap space will only go down by a few hundred thousand.

So our 'rookie pool' will be $4M or so but that doesn't mean we have to reserve an extra $4M of cap space.

I will have to agree with John as this is my way understanding it as well.

Bwaahaha! Stop already :les:
 
Top