Pandion Haliaetus
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 3,863
- Reaction score
- 802
49ers In Seattle ) vs Seahawks (13-3)
29-3 Loss (-26)
2012: 49ers (11-4-1) vs Seahawks (11-5)
42-13 Loss (-29)
2011: 49ers (13-3) vs Seahawks (7-9)
19-17 Win (+2)
2010: 49ers (6-10) vs Seahawks (7-9)
31-6 Loss (-25)
---------------------------------------------
2009: 49ers (8-8) vs Seahawks (5-11)
20-17 Loss (-3)
2008: 49ers (7-9) vs Seahawks (4-12)
33-30 OT win (+3)
2007: 49ers (5-11) vs Seahawks (10-6)
24-0 Loss (-24)
2006: 49ers (7-9) vs Seahawks (9-7)
24-14 Win (+10) (The Big Wind Storm game)
2005: 49ers (4-12) vs Seahawks (13-3)
41-3 Loss (-38)
So, the trend is when the Seahawks are about equal (within 2 wins) or better in talent (measured in wins) they've won 5 times to 1 loss by an average of 28.4 points. If you include the one loss the average point differential only drops to 22.
When the Seahawks are less talented than the 49ers, they're 1-2 vs SFO . They lost by an average of 2.5 points. If you include the Seahawks win the point differential drops to .667 points.
Either way historically when the Seahawks have been about at least equal in talent, Seahawks have blown out the 49ers FIVE times in Seattle.
And when we had lesser talent, Seahawks always kept within a FG.
CLINK is just a tough place for the 49ers whether or not the Seahawks the lesser team.
Not that history will help us win this next game, but I feel good in understanding that for whatever reasons SFO is just not good in Seattle even when they have had the better team over the years like in 2011.
29-3 Loss (-26)
2012: 49ers (11-4-1) vs Seahawks (11-5)
42-13 Loss (-29)
2011: 49ers (13-3) vs Seahawks (7-9)
19-17 Win (+2)
2010: 49ers (6-10) vs Seahawks (7-9)
31-6 Loss (-25)
---------------------------------------------
2009: 49ers (8-8) vs Seahawks (5-11)
20-17 Loss (-3)
2008: 49ers (7-9) vs Seahawks (4-12)
33-30 OT win (+3)
2007: 49ers (5-11) vs Seahawks (10-6)
24-0 Loss (-24)
2006: 49ers (7-9) vs Seahawks (9-7)
24-14 Win (+10) (The Big Wind Storm game)
2005: 49ers (4-12) vs Seahawks (13-3)
41-3 Loss (-38)
So, the trend is when the Seahawks are about equal (within 2 wins) or better in talent (measured in wins) they've won 5 times to 1 loss by an average of 28.4 points. If you include the one loss the average point differential only drops to 22.
When the Seahawks are less talented than the 49ers, they're 1-2 vs SFO . They lost by an average of 2.5 points. If you include the Seahawks win the point differential drops to .667 points.
Either way historically when the Seahawks have been about at least equal in talent, Seahawks have blown out the 49ers FIVE times in Seattle.
And when we had lesser talent, Seahawks always kept within a FG.
CLINK is just a tough place for the 49ers whether or not the Seahawks the lesser team.
Not that history will help us win this next game, but I feel good in understanding that for whatever reasons SFO is just not good in Seattle even when they have had the better team over the years like in 2011.