Largent on the SB in NY.
- Thread starter Largent80
- Start date
OP
OP
Largent80
New member
In L.A. we have the Collesium, and in nearby Pasadena, the Rose Bowl.
It is 80 degrees down here now.
It is 80 degrees down here now.
Landhawk1
New member
He's right but we're winning it anyway since it's there! Obtw, who else but our HAWKS would be in two SB games and have them be in Detroit and Jersey...what's up with that?
Jazzhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2009
- Messages
- 10,237
- Reaction score
- 72
The selection was payback for NY/NJ building the stadium. Stupid/dumb is right.
LudwigsDrummer
Well-known member
Next year in Phoenix.
Perfect for a back to back IMO.
Perfect for a back to back IMO.
Hasselbeck
New member
- Joined
- May 2, 2009
- Messages
- 11,397
- Reaction score
- 4
Jazzhawk":2ekzezub said:
It was actually because the NFL wanted to put a Super Bowl there after 9/11.
http://www.newsday.com/sports/football/ ... -1.6806320
I'm gonna have to disagree with Mr Largent on this one, the Superbowl should be played in all weather conditions. That is like saying Green Bay should not have a football team, because it's to cold there. I would like to see the Superbowl played in every stadium in the NFL, especially the team with the best regular season/playoff record. The Superbowl should be played in Seattle this year, because the Seahawks kick ass and have the best stadium in the NFL.
Every season ticket holder of both teams in the Superbowl should receive an option to buy two tickets at face value. This would reward season ticket holders.
Every season ticket holder of both teams in the Superbowl should receive an option to buy two tickets at face value. This would reward season ticket holders.
SalishHawkFan
New member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 5,872
- Reaction score
- 0
I think whoever wins the Super Bowl should get to host it 5 years later.
brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
Every NFL city isn't capable of hosting such an event. Green bay and Foxboro are actually tiny and while NYC /new jersey are big enough I think Jersey bowl is a mistake. Preparation for the weather is going to cause a security nightmare.
VivaEfrenHerrera
Active member
Haha! This is a super-awesome idea! :th2thumbs:SalishHawkFan":20rd1mh0 said:
Awww. This is an annoying reality.brimsalabim":20rd1mh0 said:
OP
OP
Largent80
New member
Why hasn't Seattle gotten one.? The stadium is top notch, lots of hotels/eateries. BFD, it rains, remember the SB where Manning won?...Thats right, Miami, in pouring rain.
taz291819
New member
mikehawks":r1p0rfmb said:
Gotta disagree. If I'm spending that type of money, I'd rather it be in warm weather.
And your idea about tickets... that's not plausible. Hell, it's down right laughable.
OP
OP
Largent80
New member
I could take 3 awesome vacations for the price of going to NY, no thanks, I just bought a new 60" tv to watch the game on for 799. And the good news is after we win I can keep on seeing it.
Suck it Goodell or whoever is the picker of locations. As I said before, the colessium is vacant as well as the Rose Bowl. 80 degree weather and beaches/women.
Suck it Goodell or whoever is the picker of locations. As I said before, the colessium is vacant as well as the Rose Bowl. 80 degree weather and beaches/women.
hawksfansinceday1
Active member
Seriously Rob, I'll be the first to cry about how good the weather is down there but both stadiums are utterly obsolete by today's standards. The C-Link blows them both away. Now as for the women............Largent80":30zywcvp said:
And btw, you won't be complaining when Manning throws his 2nd pick because it's cold and windy.
Eldorado
New member
LudwigsDrummer":1md4aik9 said:
I absolutely agree. :th2thumbs:
VivaEfrenHerrera
Active member
Stadium's not quite big enough either. But that's fixable. I've heard it speculated that we could probably get one if Paul Allen really wanted one, and started agitating loudly to get it. But loudly agitating doesn't really seem like his ownership style.Polaris":224u8w87 said:
hawksfansinceday1
Active member
Yeah my best bud and I are already strongly considering it when the Hawks go for the back to back titles.Eldorado":peqdtw9o said:
joeseahawks
New member
Perfect. That's exactly what should be done.
SalishHawkFan":y17ud9o6 said:
HawaiiD
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2013
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 47
Largent80":1ebt1qun said:
Unless C-link adds a few thousand more seats? It won't happen. I believe the minimum seating capacity to host a Super Bowl is 72,000 or 75,000 or so. C-link is currently 68,000
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Chris Simms Defensive Tackle ranks (NBC Sports)
- Latest: Pandion Haliaetus
-
-
