bigtrain21":357mekv0 said:
Sgt. Largent":357mekv0 said:
SoulfishHawk":357mekv0 said:
Screw him, after his comments about Doug Baldwin, he can go suck off Manning.
LOL
I didn't have a problem with what Carter said, cause he's right. If Tate and Baldwin were the great receivers they think they are, the Hawks wouldn't have gone out and given Harvin all that money. Obviously Pete and John saw that this team needed to get more productive and dynamic at the WR position.
The part Carter doesn't take into account is the fact that this is a run first ball control offense, so of course our receivers aren't going to have awesome stats.
I don't think adding Percy Harvin means you don't like the receivers you have. I don't see the connection. Any team would add a healthy Percy Harvin to their receivers no matter how great they are.
It absolutely means you're not satisfied with your receiver corp's production. Why else would you spend that much vital cap room signing someone like Harvin if you didn't think that was a need?
I love all our WR's, but sorry they're not even close to a #1 receiver, and most of them aren't even close to a #2 or #3 receiver. If you look at numbers, Tate's a #2 or #3 at best, and Baldwin and Kearse are #4's on most teams.
You guys know it's OK to not freak out and scream into the wind when someone criticizes our team and players right? It's OK for people to have opinions, it's what makes sports fun to discuss.