Just Say It: WE'RE BETTER

In case your wondering why you feel calm and confident about this game.
We are a physical football team, the broncos are a fantasy football team that fills up a stat sheet.
We are bigger, stronger,more athletic, more enthusiastic, better conditioned, hungrier, angrier, more battle tested, and most of all we love the big stage.

Were a flat out better team, and I can't wait for them to show the world!

Bruce Irvin is my surprise Xfactor...I have not heard a single word about him, and I will never forget what he did during the Monday Night green bay game.

Seahawks > Broncos

We're a team. Denver is one guy. They haven't been relevant to the playoffs since Jake Plummer.

Yep, one guy can win you regular season games and playoff games(sometimes) but not games like this.

253hawk":3j82okjz said:

We're a team. Denver is one guy. They haven't been relevant to the playoffs since Jake Plummer.

Click to expand...

Jake the Snake! Lol.

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Shadyhawk182":18aoo6dj said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

Vernon Davis is also a big guy. Ask him how he likes playing this defense!

Shadyhawk182":229m4vvi said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

I see the secondary having a harder time with Welker than Thomas^2 and Decker. Small and shifty seems to cause them more problems than any kind of size.

Very true.
But it could be a bit more difficult to handle a whole receiver set, minus Welker, all around that size.

Bitter":24fm4zhn said:

Shadyhawk182":24fm4zhn said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

I see the secondary having a harder time with Welker than Thomas^2 and Decker. Small and shifty seems to cause them more problems than any kind of size.

Click to expand...

I also agree with having a harder time defending Welker. I'm not knocking our Secondary. I'm just saying their receivers are the same size or a bit bigger than our Secondary for the most part. So i wouldn't expect to flat out man handle them.

I'm constantly hearing about how our DBs haven't yet seen a receiving corps like the Broncos this season. That is true, but it's just as true that the Broncos receivers haven't seen a defense like ours. We may not "manhandle" them per se, but I think they're not going to be fully ready for what they're about to experience.

I think the Bronco WRs are in for a rude, painful surprise. These guys are used to owning position against the average corners. Sherm, Maxwell and even Thurmond will have their hands full but they are going to be able to hang with the big WRs while not losing position. Welker is the problem guy for sure.

They are going to make a lot of catches, but are they going to be able to take the hits? Throw enough balls on Seattle and you will get picked. Seahawks opponent QB rating typically very low.

Denver does not have the lineup or the depth, but their 1s on offense are solid. Denver defense is depleted and weak. Pork chop, Meat loaf, fried rice whatever his name is is not enough. Champ and DRC? Lol. #longday.

Hawkalypse":18t42ovr said:

Seahawks > Broncos

Click to expand...

Agreed. Why is everyone ignoring what we did to New Orleans? A team with a quarterback that can actually throw deep and actually has a defense? Pot Roast? Really now...c'mon man.

I hadn't really watched the Broncos and what they did in the AFC championship so I recorded it on NFL rewind and watched it today. I feel better after watching that. I really think that we matchup well with our speed based on what I saw. The Pats allowed some critical first downs by missing tackles. Our guys have to be sure in this part of the game. From everthing I heard about Pot Roast, I expected to see him in the backfield on every play. After watching the game, it seems like he's getting all the talk mainly for that one sack.
Our receivers who get criticized a lot are better than what the Patriots had in that game. Austin Collie getting looks on third down?? Are you kidding me?

I think we are better and can do this. Having to go up against Peyton Manning is the only thing that is making me nervous

Shadyhawk182":1yearqn1 said:

Bitter":1yearqn1 said:

Shadyhawk182":1yearqn1 said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

I see the secondary having a harder time with Welker than Thomas^2 and Decker. Small and shifty seems to cause them more problems than any kind of size.

Click to expand...

I also agree with having a harder time defending Welker. I'm not knocking our Secondary. I'm just saying their receivers are the same size or a bit bigger than our Secondary for the most part. So i wouldn't expect to flat out man handle them.

Click to expand...

Actually they play soft despite their size. Welker is the guy that's worrisome.

MizzouHawkGal":36wptaib said:

Hawkalypse":36wptaib said:

Seahawks > Broncos

Click to expand...

Agreed. Why is everyone ignoring what we did to New Orleans? A team with a quarterback that can actually throw deep and actually has a defense? Pot Roast? Really now...c'mon man.

Click to expand...

Lol, yep. This media creation of this Pork rind, Ham hock or Pot Roast whatever is pretty weak and contrived. Trying to make the guy out as the second coming of William Perry is ridiculous. The guy had a decent quarter of a season this year!!!!! He did'nt light it up in Jacksonville and suddenly he's a world beater.

MizzouHawkGal":n4n1kylp said:

Shadyhawk182":n4n1kylp said:

Bitter":n4n1kylp said:

Shadyhawk182":n4n1kylp said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

I see the secondary having a harder time with Welker than Thomas^2 and Decker. Small and shifty seems to cause them more problems than any kind of size.

Click to expand...

I also agree with having a harder time defending Welker. I'm not knocking our Secondary. I'm just saying their receivers are the same size or a bit bigger than our Secondary for the most part. So i wouldn't expect to flat out man handle them.

Click to expand...

Actually they play soft despite their size. Welker is the guy that's worrisome.

Click to expand...

Agree that Welker is worrisome. I heard some talking heads today say that Walter Thurmond might be the best nickle corner in the league. That bodes well for us since that should be a matchup.

MizzouHawkGal":2fnlr4jo said:

Shadyhawk182":2fnlr4jo said:

Bitter":2fnlr4jo said:

Shadyhawk182":2fnlr4jo said:

I agree with everything minus the "bigger" part. For the most part their WRs are big. I think minus Welker they are bigger than our Secondary. I don't like this mind set like we're gonna throw their receivers around. That's setting ourselves up to be disappointed. These guys are pretty big, I could see them getting just as physical back.

Click to expand...

I see the secondary having a harder time with Welker than Thomas^2 and Decker. Small and shifty seems to cause them more problems than any kind of size.

Click to expand...

I also agree with having a harder time defending Welker. I'm not knocking our Secondary. I'm just saying their receivers are the same size or a bit bigger than our Secondary for the most part. So i wouldn't expect to flat out man handle them.

Click to expand...

Actually they play soft despite their size. Welker is the guy that's worrisome.

Click to expand...

Lay a good lick on Welker and he is done. See Pats game here last year. Browner put a good smack on him and he was done after that.

It is. This is Maxwell's and Thurmond's chance to get the money or be run of the mill. I am trusting that Bennett/Avril/Mebane/McDonald and Harvin change the scenerio. I think they do.

We have no single point of failure. We can win many different ways, we have the luxury of guys not being their best. They have a world class QB and we have a more complete team.