The cuts we are seeing would have happened, Superbowl or not. The attempt to re-sign Bennett would be the same. This post really seems to be about Tate. Just seems to me that he really rather be in an offense that allows him more touches. The Seahawks role for him wasn't going to change, not yet, since I don't expect the passing game to expand in a big way for at least another season. I do think in 2 yrs you will see Wilson putting the ball up 30-35 times. But that is just my hunch.
I don't think anything differently happens this offseason, Superbowl or not.
[off-topic]
I definitely can see Tate going over 1000 yds and 10 TDs. Caldwell may want to scale down the passing game, but he better have an OC that was better than he was with Baltimore. Maybe Ray Rice had an offseason and the O-line stunk, but the Lions cannot sustain with the running game production Caldwell helped produce in Baltimore.
Eventually, unless the Lions start off hot with a toned-down offense, they have to use the part of their team where a lot of capital has been spent. Plus, Tate seems to be under the illusion that the Lions will be a pass-happy team. Either he was sleeping while the coaches were laying out how they wanted to use him or it sounds like Caldwell may not exactly mean a 50/50 running to passing offense.
[/off-topic]