I respectfully think any notion that they are using "lower quality" is not all that useful.
What we know is this. The Seahawk program is fueled by a commitment to build a specific plan for every individual at the VMAC. They repeat that message continuously. So there are possibilities for players starting their careers and potential roles for accomplished players finishing their careers.
We also have heard, repeatably, about building a rotation up front on the defensive line. After four years of following along, I tend to believe them. They are looking for unique players that fit into and buy into a unique program. Preconceptions and models that others are carrying around in their heads do not necessarily apply to the VMAC.
When Seattle signed Cliff Avril and Michael Bennett last year, the loudest conclusions were that the market was soft and the Seahawks stole a couple of good pass rushers. I would summit their conclusions were wrong because their assumptions were wrong. The noisy crowd incorrectly presumed the two would be used on a full time bases. The 2013 snap count exposed the folly of those assumptions.
Many fretted over the retention of Michael Bennett. When Michael Bennett extended, there were many that expressed amazement at the numbers. And, there are those that are already fretting over Cliff Avril. If Cliff Avril extends, it will be because of the plan for Cliff Avril.
So much noise and confusion outside of Seattle. Its not like the VMAC is a closed culture and super secretive installation. I'm at a loss to suggest how they can be more open and forthright. The 2013 data punctuates that their message can be trusted.
The Seahawk defense I see has 6 full time positions ..... two safeties, two cornerbacks and two linebackers. It's reflected in the snap counts. And I think, the data on contract extensions are beginning to reflect it as well.
Its a good time to reflect. Especially during this break with all its dead air.
