This "Immaculate Deflection" crap is annoying me

SalishHawkFan

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
0
Clare Farnsworth has used that term in his last two articles. This really bugs the crap out of me and here's why:

The Immaculate Reception was so called because of its miraculous nature. Sheer luck allowed Franco Harris to be in the right place at the right time. It was like a gift from God.

Nothing was "immaculate" about what Richard Sherman did. He'd done the exact same thing earlier in the season. The Legion of Boom has been making those kinds of interceptions for a long time now. They call it a Tip Drill.

Of all the nicknames for that play, I really hate Immaculate Deflection. It's wrong.

I think someone should call in to KJR and have a discussion and a vote for the official name for that play. Just to end this once and for all.

Okay, rant over.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
It's "the Tip." I refuse to accept any other name for that play.

"Immaculate deflection" is dumb on multiple levels and doesn't capture the beautiful irony of that play coming against the inventors of "the Catch."

Let's stop overthinking this. It's simply "the Tip"!
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,119
Reaction score
950
Location
Kissimmee, FL
Salish, I understand your point of view, but you're kind of wrong. Immaculate is defined as "perfectly clean" or "having no flaw or error", it has nothing to do with luck or coincidence. The Immaculate Reception was a lot of luck along with skill, The Immaculate Deflection was pure skill.

Keep those associations separate, IMO. I love the term, personally.
 

bigtrain21

New member
Joined
Jul 27, 2012
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
0
I hate it when these analysts incorrectly state that if it was thrown differently it could have been caught.

A few weeks ago they were talking about Kaepernick's extension and Tim Hasselbeck showed that play and said "If he throws that ball to the back of the end zone, it's a touchdown". Nope.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,140
Reaction score
1,530
Location
Spokane
For me it's "the tip". I think history will actually bear this out. What bugs me about immaculate deflection is it's Unoriginality. Sure lets steal a phrase that is synonymous with another franchise. Since it was against SF, might as well steal from them and call it "the non catch". The tip rolls off the tongue so much better and is so powerful in its simplicity.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,125
Reaction score
1,047
Location
Taipei
oldhawkfan":1hc9i64u said:
For me it's "the tip". I think history will actually bear this out. What bugs me about immaculate deflection is it's Unoriginality. Sure lets steal a phrase that is synonymous with another franchise. Since it was against SF, might as well steal from them and call it "the non catch". The tip rolls off the tongue so much better and is so powerful in its simplicity.

:shock:

agreed
 

Threedee

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
854
Location
Federal Way, WA
Also, if you ask Raiders fans, the Immaculate Reception touched the grass and should have been ruled incomplete. Malcolm Smith caught The Tip cleanly without any room for controversy.
 

Hawknballs

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
837
I don't really care what you call it.

have you seen our trophy?
 

bellingerga

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,323
Reaction score
2
Location
Beaverton, Oregon
RolandDeschain":9472hyu5 said:
Salish, I understand your point of view, but you're kind of wrong. Immaculate is defined as "perfectly clean" or "having no flaw or error", it has nothing to do with luck or coincidence. The Immaculate Reception was a lot of luck along with skill, The Immaculate Deflection was pure skill.

Keep those associations separate, IMO. I love the term, personally.

Exactly what I was about to post.

"free from flaws or mistakes; perfect." seems quite fitting to me and doesn't imply luck at all.
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
1,794
bigtrain21":3mwt7j8y said:
I hate it when these analysts incorrectly state that if it was thrown differently it could have been caught.

A few weeks ago they were talking about Kaepernick's extension and Tim Hasselbeck showed that play and said "If he throws that ball to the back of the end zone, it's a touchdown". Nope.
I watched that 'TIP' several times, and Crabby came down just out of the back end, so it WOULD NOT have been a TD. :141847_bnono:
Tim Hasseldumb was just repeating what Simi-Colon Kaepersuck said, and that just proves how stupid a statement it was.
My guess is that neither bothered to review where crabs feet were when he came down.
And as was mentioned already in this thread, that was the second time last Season that Sherman made that exact same play, with the exact same results....And that ain't luck, that's the best Corner in the League making a fantastic play.
 

sc85sis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
8,502
Reaction score
1,355
Location
Houston Suburbs
All that, "if it were a few inches (feet, whatever) more..." Looked to me as if it would have gone over both guys' heads if it had been thrown any farther.
 

Latest posts

Top